A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects

We conducted a quantitative meta-analysis of previous research on the technology acceptance model (TAM) in an attempt to make well-grounded statements on the role of subjective norm. Furthermore, we compared TAM results by taking into account moderating effects of one individual-related factor (type of respondents), one technology-related factor (type of technology), and one contingent factor (culture). Results indicated a significant influence of subjective norm on perceived usefulness and behavioral intention to use. Moderating effects were found for all three factors. The findings yielded managerial implications for both intra-company and market-based settings.

[1]  Christy M. K. Cheung,et al.  Using the Internet as a learning medium: an exploration of gender difference in the adoption of FaBWeb , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage , 1995 .

[3]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage , 1999 .

[4]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  A. Yuen,et al.  Gender Differences in Teacher Computer Acceptance. , 2002 .

[6]  P. A. Dabholkar.  Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality , 1996 .

[7]  Ron Henderson,et al.  Perceived usefulness, ease of use and electronic supermarket use , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  R. Green,et al.  Cross-Cultural Examination of the Fishbein Behavioral Intentions Model , 1991 .

[9]  Judy Chuan-Chuan Lin,et al.  Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[10]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[11]  Antonis C. Stylianou,et al.  Perceptions and Attitudes about E-Commerce Development in China: An Exploratory Study , 2003, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[12]  Adel M. Aladwani.  The development of two tools for measuring the easiness and usefulness of transactional Web sites , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  A Motivational Model of Microcomputer Usage , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Hassan M. Selim,et al.  An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[15]  William Oakes,et al.  External validity and the use of real people as subjects. , 1972 .

[16]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[17]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[18]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[19]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Loren V. Geistfeld,et al.  A cross-cultural investigation of consumer e-shopping adoption , 2004 .

[21]  이훈,et al.  지각된 유용성(Perceived Usefulness)의 영향분석 , 2004 .

[22]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Statistically Combining Independent Studies: A Meta-Analysis of Sex Differences in Conformity Research , 1979 .

[24]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[25]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[26]  Peter Roberts,et al.  The beta test of an electronic supermarket , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[27]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[28]  Ronald M. Lee,et al.  A logic programming framework for planning and simulation , 1986 .

[29]  Christopher R. Plouffe.  Intermediating technologies and multi‐group adoption: A comparison of consumer and merchant adoption intentions toward a new electronic payment system , 2001 .

[30]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[31]  Yikuan Lee,et al.  New product launch strategy for network effects products , 2003 .

[32]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  WRITING META-ANALYTIC REVIEWS , 1995 .

[33]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[34]  D. Ones,et al.  Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling , 1995 .

[35]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[36]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 1996 .

[37]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  Standard user interface in e-commerce sites , 2003, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[38]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[39]  Peter Roberts,et al.  Information technology acceptance in a sample of government employees: a test of the technology acceptance model , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[40]  Ibrahim M. Al-Jabri,et al.  The relationship of attitudes to computer utilization: New evidence from a developing nation , 1998 .

[41]  Theodore H.K. Clark,et al.  Online Course Acceptance: A Paired Sample Experiment , 2003 .

[42]  R. Dye.  The buzz on buzz. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[43]  D. O. Sears.  College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .

[44]  IgbariaMagid,et al.  Why do individuals use computer technology , 1995 .

[45]  Janice E. J. Woodrow,et al.  The Influence of Programming Training on the Computer Literacy and Attitudes of Preservice Teachers , 1992 .

[46]  James E. Yao,et al.  Exploring Factors Associated with Wireless Internet via Mobile Technology Acceptance in Mainland China , 2014, Communications of the IIMA.

[47]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[48]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Predicting E-Services Adoption: A Perceived Risk Facets Perspective , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[49]  Erik M. van Raaij,et al.  The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[50]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  An investigation of user attitudes toward search engines as an information retrieval tool , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[52]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Evaluating information accessibility and community adaptivity features for sustaining virtual learning communities , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[53]  Mark Srite,et al.  A Research Model for Mobile Phone Service Behaviors: Empirical Validation in the U.S. and Turkey , 2005 .

[54]  Ingoo Han,et al.  Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking , 2002, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[55]  Greg W. Marshall,et al.  Sales force use of technology: antecedents to technology acceptance , 2005 .

[56]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[57]  H. G. Osburn,et al.  Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[58]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[59]  R. Peterson.  On the Use of College Students in Social Science Research: Insights from a Second‐Order Meta‐analysis , 2001 .

[60]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[61]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[62]  H. Kelman.  Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[63]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[64]  Jerome Yen,et al.  Adoption of On-line Trading in the Hong Kong Financial Market , 2001, J. Electron. Commer. Res..

[65]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[66]  Maarten Gelderman,et al.  The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[67]  Zhan Wu,et al.  Incorporating Technology Readiness (TR) Into TAM: Are Individual Traits Important to Understand Technology Acceptance? , 2003 .

[68]  D P Schultz,et al.  The human subject in psychological research. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[69]  Barbara Stern,et al.  Consumer Bidding Behavior on Internet Auction Sites , 2002, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[70]  Cynthia K. Riemenschneider,et al.  Understanding it adoption decisions in small business: integrating current theories , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[71]  Brian M. Jones,et al.  An Examination of the Technology Acceptance Model in Uruguay and the US: A Focus on Culture , 2005 .

[72]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitude and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[73]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  IT acceptance in a less-developed country: a motivational factor perspective , 2002, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[74]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[75]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technolgoy Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers , 2003, MIS Q..

[76]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[77]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[78]  Tore Dybå,et al.  An empirical investigation on factors affecting software developer acceptance and utilization of electronic process guides , 2004, 10th International Symposium on Software Metrics, 2004. Proceedings..

[79]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[80]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[81]  William H. Money,et al.  Assessing Knowledge Management System User Acceptance with the Technology Acceptance Model , 2005, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[82]  David C. Robertson,et al.  Social Determinants of Information Systems Use , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[83]  Steven P. Brown,et al.  ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF SALESPERSON JOB SATISFACTION: META ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF CAUSAL EFFECTS , 1993 .

[84]  C. Schriesheim.  Causal Analysis: Assumptions, Models, and Data , 1982 .

[85]  Paul Vin-Cent Chang,et al.  The Validity of an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) for Predicting Intranet/Portal Usage , 2004 .

[86]  Qingxiong Ma,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings , 2004, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[87]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[88]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[89]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[90]  Marios Koufaris,et al.  Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[91]  David Gefen,et al.  TAM or Just Plain Habit: A Look at Experienced Online Shoppers , 2003, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[92]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..