AN IMPROVED STRIPPING TECHNIQUE FOR LIGHTLY ARMORED DINOFLAGELLATES 1

Identification of armored heterotrophic dinoflagellates relies, in part, on plate tabulations obtained by SEM. Currently, two methods are used to visualize plate morphology and develop plate tabulations: swelling the sutures between the cellulose plates of intact organisms or stripping off the outer membranes with ethanol to expose the underlying cellulose plates. Both approaches are problematic with lightly armored dinoflagellates because sutures do not consistently swell to enable visualization, and the outer membranes are not consistently stripped. Further, generic and species differences necessitate frequent modification of these protocols to obtain reliable results. We describe an improved membrane stripping technique using the detergent Triton X‐100. Our method provides a more consistent standardized approach to removing the outer membranes of lightly armored dinoflagellates, including Pfiesteria shumwayae Glasgow & Burkholder, a taxon that has, until now, proven very difficult to strip with currently published methods. This method allows visualization of the sulcus, a region previously difficult to observe, and will greatly facilitate taxonomic studies of the lightly armored forms.

[1]  K. Steidinger,et al.  Classification and identification of Pfiesteria and Pfiesteria-like species. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[2]  K. Reece,et al.  Skin ulcers in estuarine fishes: a comparative pathological evaluation of wild and laboratory-exposed fish. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  J. Burkholder,et al.  A second species of ichthyotoxic Pfiesteria (Dinamoebales, Dinophyceae) , 2001 .

[4]  A. Colorni,et al.  THE PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIP OF PFIESTERIA PISCICIDA, CRYPTOPERIDINIOPSOID SP. AMYLOODINOUM OCELLATUM AND A PFIESTERIA‐LIKE DINOFLAGELLATE TO OTHER DINOFLAGELLATES AND APICOMPLEXANS , 1999, Journal of Phycology.

[5]  Michael W Taylor,et al.  KINETICS OF AMMONIUM ASSIMILATION IN TWO SEAWEEDS, ENTEROMORPHA SP. (CHLOROPHYCEAE) AND OSMUNDARIA COLENSOI (RHODOPHYCEAE) , 1999 .

[6]  F. Taylor MORPHOLOGY (TABULATION) AND MOLECULAR EVIDENCE FOR DINOFLAGELLATE PHYLOGENY REINFORCE EACH OTHER , 1999 .

[7]  J. Burkholder,et al.  Pfiesteria piscicida and other Pfiesreria‐like dinoflagellates: Behavior, impacts, and environmental controls , 1997 .

[8]  E. Truby Preparation of single‐celled marine dinoflagellates for electron microscopy , 1997, Microscopy research and technique.

[9]  E. Carpenter,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL PROTOCOL FOR WHOLE‐CELL IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE OF MARINE PHYTOPLANKTON 1 , 1996 .

[10]  J. Burkholder,et al.  Fish kills linked to a toxic ambush-predator dinoflagellate: distribution and environmental conditions , 1995 .

[11]  R. Fensome A classification of living and fossil dinoflagellates , 1993 .

[12]  J. Burkholder,et al.  New ‘phantom’ dinoflagellate is the causative agent of major estuarine fish kills , 1992, Nature.

[13]  A. Helenius,et al.  Solubilization of membranes by detergents. , 1975, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[14]  S. Malhotra Fixation for Electron Microscopy , 1963, Nature.