Minimising systematic error surfaces in digital elevation models using oblique convergent imagery

There are increasing opportunities to use consumer‐grade digital cameras, particularly if accurate spatial data can be captured. Research recently conducted at Loughborough University identified residual systematic error surfaces or domes discernible in digital elevation models (DEMs). These systematic effects are often associated with such cameras and are caused by slightly inaccurate estimated lens distortion parameters. A methodology that minimises the systematic error surfaces was therefore developed, using a mildly convergent image configuration in a vertical perspective. This methodology was tested through simulation and a series of practical tests. This paper investigates the potential of the convergent configuration to minimise the error surfaces, even if the geometrically more complex oblique perspective is used. Initially, simulated data was used to demonstrate that an oblique convergent image configuration can minimise remaining systematic error surfaces using various imaging angles. Additionally, practical tests using a laboratory testfield were conducted to verify results of the simulation. The need to develop a system to measure the topographic surface of a flooding river provided the opportunity to verify the findings of the simulation and laboratory test using real data. Results of the simulation process, the laboratory test and the practical test are reported in this paper and demonstrate that an oblique convergent image configuration eradicates the systematic error surfaces which result from inaccurate lens distortion parameters. This approach is significant because by removing the need for an accurate lens model it effectively improves the accuracies of digital surface representations derived using consumer‐grade digital cameras. Carefully selected image configurations could therefore provide new opportunities for improving the quality of photogrammetrically acquired data.

[1]  John G. Fryer,et al.  On the accuracy of heighting from aerial photographs and maps: Implications to process modellers , 1994 .

[2]  Clive S. Fraser,et al.  Digital camera self-calibration , 1997 .

[3]  Jim H. Chandler,et al.  The assessment of sediment transport rates by automated digital photogrammetry: Photogram , 1998 .

[4]  Jim H. Chandler,et al.  The accuracy of a river bed moulding/casting system and the effectiveness of a low‐cost digital camera for recording river bed fabric , 2003 .

[5]  R. Reulke,et al.  Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences , 2005 .

[6]  Mj Grenness,et al.  Stereo‐Photogrammetric Mapping of Tooth Replicas Incorporating Texture , 2005 .

[7]  J. Fryer,et al.  Metric capabilities of low‐cost digital cameras for close range surface measurement , 2005 .

[8]  Jim H. Chandler,et al.  THE ARCHIVAL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC TECHNIQUE: FURTHER APPLICATION AND DEVELOPMENT , 2006 .

[9]  J. Hothmer POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS FOR ELIMINATION OF DISTORTION IN AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS , 2006 .

[10]  M. A. R. Cooper,et al.  Statistical concepts and their application in photogrammetry and surveying (continued) , 2006 .

[11]  C. Fraser EVOLUTION OF NETWORK ORIENTATION PROCEDURES , 2006 .

[12]  S. I. Granshaw,et al.  BUNDLE ADJUSTMENT METHODS IN ENGINEERING PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2006 .

[13]  C. Fraser,et al.  Digital camera calibration methods: Considerations and comparisons , 2006 .

[14]  Paul Cross,et al.  STATISTICAL CONCEPTS AND THEIR APPLICATION IN PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND SURVEYING , 2006 .

[15]  Thomas Luhmann,et al.  Close Range Photogrammetry , 2007 .

[16]  Jim H. Chandler,et al.  Geometric consistency and stability of consumer‐grade digital cameras for accurate spatial measurement , 2007 .

[17]  J. Chandler,et al.  A convergent image configuration for DEM extraction that minimises the systematic effects caused by an inaccurate lens model , 2008 .

[18]  Koji Shiono,et al.  Measuring a dynamic and flooding river surface by close range digital photogrammetry , 2008 .

[19]  MINIMISING SYSTEMATIC ERRORS IN DEMS CAUSED BY AN INACCURATE LENS MODEL , 2008 .

[20]  Fabio Remondinoa,et al.  IMAGE-BASED SURFACE MEASUREMENT FOR CLOSE-RANGE HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION , 2008 .

[21]  Stuart Robson,et al.  Measurement of transparent plastic sculptures using photogrammetry, laser scanning and touch probing for conservation purposes , 2008 .

[22]  J. H. Chandlera R. Wackrowa,et al.  MEASURING A DYNAMIC AND FLOODING RIVER SURFACE BY CLOSE RANGE DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2008 .

[23]  R. Wackrow Spatial measurement with consumer grade digital cameras , 2008 .

[24]  Fabio Remondino,et al.  3D Ichnology—recovering digital 3D models of dinosaur footprints , 2010 .