Journal reading habits of internists

We assessed the reading habits of internists with and without epidemiological training because such information may help guide medical journals as they make changes in how articles are edited and formatted. In a 1998 national self-administered mailed survey of 143 internists with fellowship training in epidemiology and study design and a random sample of 121 internists from the American Medical Association physician master file, we asked about the number of hours spent reading medical journals per week and the percentage of articles for which only the abstract is read. Respondents also were asked which of nine medical journals they subscribe to and read regularly. Of the 399 eligible participants, 264 returned surveys (response rate 66%). Respondents reported spending 4.4 hours per week reading medical journal articles and reported reading only the abstract for 63% of the articles; these findings were similar for internists with and without epidemiology training. Respondents admitted to a reliance on journal editors to provide rigorous and useful information, given the limited time available for critical reading. We conclude that internists, regardless of training in epidemiology, rely heavily on abstracts and prescreening of articles by editors.

[1]  J. Stross,et al.  The impact of mandatory continuing medical education. , 1978, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

[2]  R M Pitkin,et al.  Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles. , 1999, JAMA.

[3]  Ellen Fineout-Overholt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature , 2002 .

[4]  M. Winker,et al.  The need for concrete improvement in abstract quality. , 1999, JAMA.

[5]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: III. How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test: B. What Are the Results and Will They Help Me In Caring for My Patients? , 1994 .

[6]  M. Fagan,et al.  Evidence-based medicine: a powerful educational tool for clerkship education. , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[7]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1994, JAMA.

[8]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: II. How to Use an Article About Therapy or Prevention B. What Were the Results and Will They Help Me in Caring for My Patients? , 1994 .

[9]  J. Stross,et al.  The dissemination of new medical information. , 1979, JAMA.

[10]  E. R. Stinson,et al.  Survey of health professionals' information habits and needs. Conducted through personal interviews. , 1980, JAMA.

[11]  D Fitzgerald,et al.  How to keep up with the medical literature: II. Deciding which journals to read regularly. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[12]  D L Sackett,et al.  On the need for evidence-based medicine. , 1995, Therapie.

[13]  S. Goodman,et al.  Do readers and peer reviewers agree on manuscript quality? , 1994, JAMA.

[14]  T R Einarson,et al.  Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. , 1994, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[15]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1994, JAMA.

[16]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: I. How to Get Started , 1993 .

[17]  D Fitzgerald,et al.  How to keep up with the medical literature: I. Why try to keep up and how to get started. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[18]  R M Pitkin,et al.  Can the accuracy of abstracts be improved by providing specific instructions? A randomized controlled trial. , 1998, JAMA.

[19]  D Fitzgerald,et al.  How to keep up with the medical literature: IV. Using the literature to solve clinical problems. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[20]  Do physicians judge a study by its cover? An investigation of journal attribution bias. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[21]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't , 1996, BMJ.

[22]  D A Asch,et al.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.