Process intensification in trickle-bed reactors

Process intensification (PI) is the strategy of making significant reductions in the size of a chemical plant in order to achieve a given production objective. Innovations in catalytic reactors, which constitute the heart of such process technologies, are often the preferred starting point. Trickle-bed reactors are multifunctional reactive systems (catalysts, reactors, etc.), and allow a unique way of achieving PI in the chemical process and refining industry. In this millennium, process intensification in trickle-bed reactors is essential to meet the ultra low specification of the transportation fuel. The process intensification by operating at elevated pressure and temperature, and better understanding of flow behavior (which also helps for better design and scaleup), inducing pulse and operating in countercurrent mode is discussed here. Recommendations have been made for the future research in this area.

[1]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Catalyst bed dilution for improving catalyst wetting in laboratory trickle‐bed reactors , 1996 .

[2]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  High-Pressure Trickle-Bed Reactors: A Review , 1997 .

[3]  Patricia M. Haure,et al.  Experimental study of the peridoic operation of a trickle ‐bed reactor , 1995 .

[4]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Discriminating Trickle-Flow Hydrodynamic Models: Some Recommendations , 2000 .

[5]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  Stretching operational life of trickle‐bed filters by liquid‐induced pulse flow , 2005 .

[6]  Vijay K. Dhir,et al.  A hydrodynamic model for two-phase flow through porous media , 1988 .

[7]  Kai Sundmacher,et al.  Multicomponent mass and energy transport on different length scales in a packed reactive distillation column for heterogeneously catalysed fuel ether production , 1994 .

[8]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  Experimental study of a trickle-bed reactor operating at high pressure: two-phase pressure drop and liquid saturation , 1991 .

[9]  G. Versteeg,et al.  Absorption accompanied with chemical reaction in trickle-bed reactors , 1997 .

[10]  Vito Specchia,et al.  Trickle-bed reactors: state of art and perspectives , 1992 .

[11]  P. L. Silveston,et al.  Periodic operation of a trickle‐bed reactor , 1989 .

[12]  P. S. T. Sai,et al.  Pressure drop in gas‐liquid downflow through packed beds , 1987 .

[13]  A. F. Seibert,et al.  Capacity and efficiency of reactive distillation bale packing : Modeling and experimental validation , 1997 .

[14]  Songjiang Tian,et al.  Study on Catalytic Distillation Processes , 1997 .

[15]  Krishna D.P. Nigam,et al.  TRICKLE BED REACTORS , 1996 .

[16]  K. Nigam,et al.  Enhanced liquid spreading due to porosity , 2004 .

[17]  Phillip Colella,et al.  A numerical model for trickle bed reactors , 2000 .

[18]  Extending the F-function concept to two-phase flow in trickle beds , 2001 .

[19]  Patricia Haure,et al.  Analysis of rate enhancement in a periodically operated trickle‐bed reactor , 1997 .

[20]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  Double‐slit model for partially wetted trickle flow hydrodynamics , 2000 .

[21]  Z. Yuxiang,et al.  Study on catalytic distillation processes. Part II: Simulation of catalytic distillation processes. Quasi-homogeneous and rate-based model , 1992 .

[22]  P. L. Silveston,et al.  A cycled trickle-bed reactor for SO2 oxidation , 1995 .

[23]  V. Starov,et al.  Spreading of liquid drops over saturated porous layers. , 2002, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[24]  Rajamani Krishna,et al.  Counter-current operation of structured catalytically packed distillation columns: pressure drop, holdup and mixing , 1999 .

[25]  Ruben G. Carbonell,et al.  hydrodynamic parameters for gas-liquid cocurrent flow in packed beds , 1985 .

[26]  Ross Taylor,et al.  Counter-current operation of a structured catalytically packed-bed reactor : Liquid phase mixing and mass transfer , 1999 .

[27]  V M Starov,et al.  Spreading of liquid drops over porous substrates. , 2003, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[28]  M. I. Urseanu,et al.  Induced pulse operation of high-pressure trickle bed reactors with organic liquids: hydrodynamics and reaction study , 2004 .

[29]  J. Hanika,et al.  Forced periodic operation of a trickle-bed reactor , 1999 .

[30]  H.P.A. Calis,et al.  The three-levels-of-porosity reactor. A novel reactor for countercurrent trickle-flow processes , 1997 .

[31]  Yuanxin Wu,et al.  Prediction of Pressure Drop and Liquid Holdup in High-Pressure Trickle-Bed Reactors , 1998 .

[32]  R. Missen,et al.  Trickle‐bed reactors: Tracer study of liquid holdup and wetting efficiency at high temperature and pressure , 1991 .

[33]  Freek Kapteijn,et al.  Gas–liquid mass transfer in an internally finned monolith operated countercurrently in the film flow regime , 1999 .

[34]  Fernando V. Díez,et al.  Determination of Wetting Efficiency in Trickle-Bed Reactors by a Reaction Method , 1997 .

[35]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Catalyst wetting efficiency in trickle-bed reactors at high pressure , 1995 .

[36]  P. Trambouze,et al.  Countercurrent two-phase flow fixed bed catalytic reactors , 1990 .

[37]  F. Larachi,et al.  Catalyst Wetting in Trickle-Flow Reactors: A Phenomenological Model , 1999 .

[38]  Ruben G. Carbonell,et al.  Multiphase Flow Models in Packed Beds , 2000 .

[39]  G. Froment,et al.  Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design , 1979 .

[40]  K. Kan,et al.  Pressure Drop and Holdup in Two-Phase Cocurrent Trickle Flows through Beds of Small Packings , 1979 .

[41]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  A phenomenological model for pressure drop, liquid holdup, and flow regime transition in gas-liquid trickle flow , 1992 .

[42]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  Hydrodynamics and mass transfer in trickle-bed reactors: an overview , 1999 .

[43]  Freek Kapteijn,et al.  Hydrodynamics of gas-liquid countercurrent flow in internally finned monolithic structures , 1997 .

[44]  P. V. Ravindra,et al.  Liquid Flow Texture in Trickle-Bed Reactors: An Experimental Study , 1997 .

[45]  K. Nigam,et al.  Partial wetting in porous catalysts: wettability and wetting efficiency , 2002 .

[46]  Klaas R. Westerterp,et al.  Hydrodynamics in a cocurrent gas-liquid trickle bed at elevated pressures , 1991 .

[47]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  CFD of multiphase flow in packed‐bed reactors: I. k‐Fluid modeling issues , 2002 .

[48]  V. Starov,et al.  Spreading of liquid drops over dry porous layers: complete wetting case. , 2002, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[49]  Christophe Boyer,et al.  Modelling of the hydrodynamics of the cocurrent gas–liquid trickle flow through a trickle-bed reactor , 1999 .

[50]  M. A. Latifi,et al.  Analysis of two-phase flow distribution in trickle-bed reactors , 2001 .

[51]  Chengwen Zhong,et al.  Control of vertical acceleration (effective gravity) between normal and microgravity , 2001 .

[52]  P. L. Silveston,et al.  Investigations of periodically operated trickle-bed reactors , 1994 .

[53]  Freek Kapteijn,et al.  Monolithic catalysts as more efficient three-phase reactors , 2001 .

[54]  V. Starov,et al.  Spreading of liquid drops over thick porous layers: Complete wetting case , 2002 .

[55]  Gabriel Wild,et al.  A new, improved liquid hold-up correlation for trickle-bed reactors , 1990 .

[56]  L. E. Scriven,et al.  HOW LIQUIDS SPREAD ON SOLIDS , 1987 .

[57]  K. Kan,et al.  Multiple Hydrodynamic States in Cocurrent Two-Phase Downflow through Packed Beds , 1978 .

[58]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Pressure drop, liquid holdup, and flow regime transition in trickle flow , 1993 .

[59]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  Theory of trickle-bed magnetohydrodynamics under magnetic-field gradients , 2003 .

[60]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Pressure drop and liquid holdup in high pressure trickle-bed reactors , 1994 .

[61]  K. Nigam,et al.  TRICKLE-BED REACTORS: LIQUID DISTRIBUTION AND FLOW TEXTURE , 2004 .

[62]  Krishna D.P. Nigam,et al.  Modeling hydrodynamics of trickle-bed reactors at high pressure , 2002 .

[63]  André Laurent,et al.  A new, improved pressure drop correlation for trickle-bed reactors , 1988 .

[64]  L. Bolle,et al.  Comparison of hydrodynamic parameters for countercurrent and cocurrent flow through packed beds , 1997 .

[65]  Rajamani Krishna,et al.  Process Development and Scale Up: III. Scale-up and scale-down of trickle bed processes , 1998 .

[66]  K. Nigam,et al.  Catalyst wetting characteristics in trickle‐bed reactors , 2003 .

[67]  K. Nigam,et al.  RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON HYDROPROCESSING REACTORS , 2003 .

[68]  Peter Moritz,et al.  Fluid dynamics in reactive distillation packing Katapak®-S , 1999 .

[69]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  Mitigating fines plugging in high pressure/temperature hydrotreaters using an induced-pulsing trickle-bed filtration approach , 2005 .

[70]  J. Boelhouwer.  Nonsteady operation of trickle-bed reactors : hydrodynamics, mass and heat transfer , 2001 .

[71]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Evaluation of liquid‐solid contacting in trickle‐bed reactors by tracer methods , 1981 .

[72]  Patrick L. Mills,et al.  Multiphase catalytic reactors: a perspective on current knowledge and future trends , 2002 .

[73]  J. Levec,et al.  The hydrodynamics of trickling flow in packed beds operating at high pressures. The relative permeability concept , 2001 .

[74]  C. M. D. V. Bleek,et al.  A novel structured catalyst packing for catalytic distillation of ETBE , 1999 .