The Invisible Contours of Online Dating Communities: A Social Network Perspective

This study analyzed the e-mail exchange network of participants of a national dating website. The investigation examined whether aggregated partner preferences give rise to distinct, “invisible,” clusters in online dating networks that structure dating opportunities and result in homophilous subgroups. The findings identified and visualized the ten largest network clusters of participants who interacted with each other and examined the dater characteristics most responsible for cluster membership. Rated attractiveness and age were the strongest cluster correlates, whereas education and race were relatively uncommon determinants. In sum, daters’ interdependent actions created aggregate communities unseen by the users themselves, but no less influential for dating opportunities, that were based more on attractiveness and age than on race and education.

[1]  Diane Felmlee,et al.  No Couple Is an Island: A Social Network Perspective on Dyadic Stability , 2001 .

[2]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Susan Sprecher,et al.  Close relationships and social psychology : Intersections and future paths , 2000 .

[4]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Political Ideology and Racial Preferences in Online Dating , 2014 .

[5]  Günter J. Hitsch,et al.  Matching and Sorting in Online Dating , 2008 .

[6]  H. Blossfeld,et al.  Who contacts whom? Education-specific patterns of online mate selection , 2009 .

[7]  Dan Ariely,et al.  What makes you click?—Mate preferences in online dating , 2010 .

[8]  J. Moody,et al.  DELINQUENCY AND THE STRUCTURE OF ADOLESCENT PEER GROUPS. , 2011, Criminology : an interdisciplinary journal.

[9]  Christine R. Schwartz,et al.  Trends and Variation in Assortative Mating: Causes and Consequences , 2013 .

[10]  E. Berscheid.  The greening of relationship science. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[11]  M. Kalmijn.  Shifting Boundaries: Trends in Religious and Educational Homogamy , 1991 .

[12]  Paul W. Eastwick,et al.  Online Dating , 2012, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[13]  Tyler J. VanderWeele,et al.  Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Ken-Hou Lin,et al.  Mate Selection in Cyberspace: The Intersection of Race, Gender, and Education1 , 2013, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  E. Walster,et al.  Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  S. M. Drigotas,et al.  Substituting the forest for the trees: social networks and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Mo Yu,et al.  "Where Have All the Good Men Gone?" Gendered Interactions in Online Dating. , 2014, Journal of marriage and the family.

[18]  Coye Cheshire,et al.  Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology ''out of My League'': a Real-world Test of the Matching Hypothesis on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology , 2022 .

[19]  Ken Wakita,et al.  Finding community structure in mega-scale social networks: [extended abstract] , 2007, WWW '07.

[20]  Edward M. Reingold,et al.  Graph drawing by force‐directed placement , 1991, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[21]  J. Moody.  Race, School Integration, and Friendship Segregation in America1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  Michael J. Rosenfeld,et al.  Searching for a Mate , 2012 .

[23]  Susan M. Wildermuth,et al.  We Met on the Net: Exploring the Perceptions of Online Romantic Relationship Participants , 2007 .

[24]  Matthieu Latapy,et al.  Computing Communities in Large Networks Using Random Walks , 2004, J. Graph Algorithms Appl..

[25]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[26]  Kevin Lewis.  The limits of racial prejudice , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  H. Sinclair,et al.  Don’t Tell Me Who I Can’t Love , 2015 .