Review of the manuscript se-2020-201: "An upward continuation method based on spherical harmonic analysis and its application in the calibration of satellite gravity gradiometry data"

Abstract. The ground gravity anomalies can be used to calibrate and validate the satellite gravity gradiometry data. In this study, an upward continuation method of ground gravity data based on spherical harmonic analysis is proposed, which can be applied to the calibration of satellite observations from the European Space Agency's Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE). Here, the following process was conducted to apply this method. The accuracy of the upward continuation method based on spherical harmonic analysis was verified using simulated ground gravity anomalies. The DTU13 global gravity anomaly data were used to determine the calibration parameters of the GOCE gravitational gradients based on the spherical harmonic analysis method. The trace and the tensor invariants I2, I3 of the gravitational gradients were used to verify the calibration results. The results revealed that the upward continuation errors based on spherical harmonic analysis were much smaller than the noise level in the measurement bandwidth of the GOCE gravity gradiometer. The scale factors of the Vxx, Vyy, Vzz, and Vyz components were determined at an order of magnitude of approximately 10−2, the Vxz component was approximately 10−3, and the Vxy component was approximately 10−1. The traces of gravitational gradients after calibration were improved when compared with the traces before calibration and were slightly better than the EGG_TRF_2 data released by the European Space Agency (ESA). In addition, the relative errors of the tensor invariants I2, I3 of the gravitational gradients after calibration were significantly better than those before calibration. In conclusion, the upward continuation method based on spherical harmonic analysis could meet the external calibration accuracy requirements of the gradiometer.

[1]  R. Haagmans,et al.  GOCE gradiometer data calibration , 2019, Journal of Geodesy.

[2]  F. Barthelmes,et al.  The gravity field model IGGT_R1 based on the second invariant of the GOCE gravitational gradient tensor , 2018, Journal of Geodesy.

[3]  Christian Siemes,et al.  Improving GOCE cross-track gravity gradients , 2017, Journal of Geodesy.

[4]  International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation , 2017 .

[5]  M. Fuchs,et al.  Satellite gravity gradient grids for geophysics , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[6]  R. Forsberg,et al.  Upward continuation of Dome-C airborne gravity and comparison with GOCE gradients at orbit altitude in east Antarctica , 2016, Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica.

[7]  P. Novák,et al.  Alternative validation method of satellite gradiometric data by integral transform of satellite altimetry data , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[8]  Ole Baltazar Andersen,et al.  The Impact of Using Jason-1 and Cryosat-2 Geodetic Mission Altimetry for Gravity Field Modeling , 2015 .

[9]  Ole Baltazar Andersen,et al.  Global and Arctic Marine Gravity Field From Recent Satellite Altimetry (DTU13) , 2014 .

[10]  M. Fuchs,et al.  GOCE gravity gradients versus global gravity field models , 2012 .

[11]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008) , 2012 .

[12]  Rune Floberghagen,et al.  Upgrade of the GOCE Level 1b gradiometer processor , 2012 .

[13]  H. Yıldız.  A study of regional gravity field recovery from GOCE vertical gravity gradient data in the Auvergne test area using collocation , 2012, Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica.

[14]  C. Stummer.  Gradiometer Data Processing and Analysis for the GOCE Mission , 2012 .

[15]  Johannes Bouman,et al.  Rotation of GOCE gravity gradients to local frames , 2011 .

[16]  Johannes Bouman,et al.  GOCE gravitational gradients along the orbit , 2011 .

[17]  R. Rummel,et al.  GOCE gravitational gradiometry , 2011 .

[18]  R. Pail,et al.  Alternative method for angular rate determination within the GOCE gradiometer processing , 2011 .

[19]  M. Eshagh.  Semi-stochastic modification of second-order radial derivative of Abel–Poisson’s formula for validating satellite gravity gradiometry data , 2011 .

[20]  M. Eshagh.  Least-squares modification of extended Stokes? formula and its second-order radial derivative for validation of satellite gravity gradiometry data , 2010 .

[21]  Johannes Bouman,et al.  Preprocessing of gravity gradients at the GOCE high-level processing facility , 2009 .

[22]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  Methodology and use of tensor invariants for satellite gravity gradiometry , 2008 .

[23]  R. Haagmans,et al.  Determination of gravity gradients from terrestrial gravity data for calibration and validation of gradiometric GOCE data , 2005 .

[24]  H. Denker,et al.  Upward Continuation of Ground Data for GOCE Calibration/Validation Purposes , 2005 .

[25]  J Bouman,et al.  Geodetic Methods for Calibration of GRACE and GOCE , 2003 .

[26]  M. Kern.  An analysis of the combination and downward continuation of satellite, airborne and terrestrial gravity data , 2003 .

[27]  R. Pail.  In-orbit Calibration and Local Gravity Field Continuation Problem , 2002 .

[28]  H. Denker.  Computation of Gravity Gradients Over Europe For Calibration / Validation of GOCE Data † , 2002 .

[29]  R. Koop,et al.  Calibration of GOCE SGG data using high–low SST, terrestrial gravity data and global gravity field models , 2001 .

[30]  Carl Christian Tscherning,et al.  Calibration of satellite gradiometer data aided by ground gravity data , 1998 .

[31]  N. Sneeuw.  Global spherical harmonic analysis by least‐squares and numerical quadrature methods in historical perspective , 1994 .

[32]  O. Colombo.  Numerical Methods for Harmonic Analysis on the Sphere , 1981 .