A biomechanical comparison of dominant and non-dominant arm throws for speed and accuracy

Training a non-dominant limb may increase a competitor's ability to perform with either side of his or her body and confer an advantage over competitors that use one side of the body exclusively. The aim of this study was to determine the kinematic differences between dominant and non-dominant arm throwing techniques for speed and accuracy in Under-17 and Under-19 high-performance cricketers. Seven participants performed ten throws for each arm (dominant/non-dominant) and condition (speed/accuracy) at a target positioned 10 m in front of them. Three-dimensional kinematic variables were measured using a Vicon motion analysis system. Digital footage was used to calculate stride data, ball speed, and record target accuracy. Data were analysed using repeated-measures analysis of variance and chi-squared tests. The non-dominant arm throws had significantly lower maximum lead knee lift, did not extend the lead knee in the arm acceleration phase, had significantly less elbow flexion before extension, had significantly less shoulder external rotation at the start of the arm acceleration phase, did not have a delay between the initiation of pelvic and upper torso internal rotation, and displayed a less than optimal coordination pattern. A speed–accuracy trade-off existed for the dominant arm throws. No trade-off was identified for the non-dominant arm throws. Through an enhanced understanding of how throwing technique varies between dominant and non-dominant arms, an opportunity exists for a performance-enhancing programme to be implemented so that ambidexterity of the throwing skill can be improved.

[1]  Glenn S. Fleisig,et al.  Biomechanics of Overhand Throwing with Implications for Injuries , 1996, Sports medicine.

[2]  Karen A. Ginn,et al.  Correlation between muscle strength and throwing speed in adolescent baseball players , 2001 .

[3]  George B. Dintiman,et al.  Improving health and performance in the athlete , 1979 .

[4]  D. W. Holtzen Handedness and Professional Tennis , 2000, The International journal of neuroscience.

[5]  Babette Linquist,et al.  Motor Learning Concepts and Applications, 6th ed, , 2002 .

[6]  B. Etnyre,et al.  Accuracy Characteristics of Throwing as a Result of Maximum Force Effort , 1998, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  G. Fleisig,et al.  Biomechanics of pitching with emphasis upon shoulder kinematics. , 1993, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[8]  B. Elliott,et al.  Long-axis rotation: The missing link in proximal-to-distal segmental sequencing , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[9]  S. Sakurai,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Cinematographic Analysis of Upper Limb Movement during Fastball and Curveball Baseball Pitches , 1993 .

[10]  Richard A. Magill,et al.  Motor Learning. Concepts and Applications , 1998 .

[11]  K. Alexandris,et al.  Do Left-Handed Competitors Have an Innate Superiority in Sports? , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  G. Grouios,et al.  Excess of Mixed-Footedness among Professional Soccer Players , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[13]  W. Vincent Statistics In Kinesiology , 1994 .

[14]  S C Strike,et al.  Throwing in cricket , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[15]  R. Schmidt,et al.  The relationship between force and force variability in minimal and near-maximal static and dynamic contractions. , 1980, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  Training the Nondominant Side , 2002 .

[17]  C. J. Wood,et al.  Is there a left-handed advantage in "ballistic" sports? , 1990 .

[18]  M. E. Feltner Three-Dimensional Interactions in a Two-Segment Kinetic Chain. Part II: Application to the Throwing Arm in Baseball Pitching , 1989 .

[19]  P. Gogia,et al.  The mechanics of pitching. , 1987, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[20]  E. Kreighbaum,et al.  Biomechanics: A Qualitative Approach for Studying Human Movement , 1981 .