Decision-making in soil conservation: application of a behavioral model to potato farmers in Sri Lanka

Abstract Soil erosion is one of the most devastating problems in the upper watershed areas in Sri Lanka. Erosion-prone cultivation of vegetables (especially potatoes) on steep slopes, without soil conservation measures, has become a major problem in the recent past. Soil erosion has significant impacts on on-farm as well as off-farm activities. Although various institutions have launched programs to introduce soil conservation techniques, these have not yielded expected results mainly due to a lack of understanding of the potato farmers’ behavior on investment decisions on soil conservation. Hence the conceptual model on investment decisions on soil conservation was tested in this paper. The analytical results of the generalized least square model indicated the importance of personal and economic, as well as institutional, factors in decision-making in soil conservation. Therefore, obtaining farmer adoption of erosion-control practices will require the use of various implementation tools such as education, subsidies, and technical assistance. Low willingness to invest in soil conservation indicated the necessity for public installation of conservation structures if they are to be widely used in potato farmlands in the upper watersheds in Sri Lanka.

[1]  S. Batie,et al.  Virginia Farmers' Soil Conservation Decisions: An Application of Tobit Analysis , 1987, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[2]  C. Mcdowell,et al.  The multivariate modelling and prediction of farmer's conservation behaviour towards natural ecosystems , 1989 .

[3]  T. L. Napier,et al.  Conserving soil : insights from socioeconomic research , 1988 .

[4]  Wei Hu.  Household land tenure reform in China: Its impact on farming land use and agro-environment , 1997 .

[5]  B. Gardner.  Determinants of Farm Family Income Inequality , 1969 .

[6]  David E. Ervin,et al.  Factors Affecting the Use of Soil Conservation Practices: Hypotheses, Evidence, and Policy Implications , 1982 .

[7]  R. Ready,et al.  Measuring amenity benefits from farmland: hedonic pricing vs. contingent valuation , 1997 .

[8]  G. S. Sahota.  Efficiency of Resource Allocation in Indian Agriculture , 1968 .

[9]  C. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  An application of the contingent valuation method to estimate the loss of value of water resources due to pesticide contamination: the case of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam , 2003 .

[10]  D. Moran.  Contingent valuation and biodiversity: measuring the user surplus of Kenyan protected areas , 1994, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[11]  Robert A. Young,et al.  Estimates of the Economic Value Productivity of Irrigation Water in Pakistan from Farm Surveys , 1985 .

[12]  W. Miller,et al.  The adoption process and environmental innovations: a case study of a government project. , 1978 .

[13]  H. Gunatilake,et al.  The Economics of Reservoir Sedimentation: A Case Study of Mahaweli Reservoirs in Sri Lanka , 1999 .

[14]  M. Blasé.  Soil erosion control in western Iowa: problems and progress , 1960 .

[15]  Alan Randall,et al.  Resource Economics: An Economic Approach to Natural Resource and Environmental Policy , 1981 .

[16]  S. Samarakoon,et al.  An Economic Assessment of On-Site Effects of Soil Erosion in Potato Lands in Nuwara Eliya District of Sri Lanka , 1996 .

[17]  Linda K. Lee.  The Impact of Landownership Factors on Soil Conservation , 1980 .

[18]  R. Starkloff.  Water scarcity in Kitulwatte: The social causes and consequences of environmental degradation in a highland Uva village of Sri Lanka , 1998 .

[19]  Gary D. Lynne,et al.  Attitudes and Farmer Conservation Behavior , 1988 .

[20]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence , 2000 .

[21]  M. Munasinghe,et al.  Environmental economics and natural resource management in developing countries , 1993 .

[22]  N. Lemon.  Attitudes and their measurement. , 1973 .