Why Schumpeter was Right: Innovation, Market Power, and Creative Destruction in 1920s America

Are firms with strong market positions powerful engines of technological progress? Joseph Schumpeter thought so, but his hypothesis has proved difficult to verify empirically. This article highlights Schumpeterian market-power and creative-destruction effects in a sample of early-twentieth-century U.S. industrial firms; his contention that an efficiently functioning capital market has a positive effect on the rate of innovation is also confirmed. Despite market power abuses by incumbents, the extent of innovation stands out: 21 percent of patents assigned to the firms sampled between 1920 and 1928 are cited in patents granted between 1976 and 2002.

[1]  P. Ghemawat,et al.  The Decline of Dominant Firms, 1905–1929 , 1984 .

[2]  W. Peach.  The security affiliates of national banks , 1941 .

[3]  C. Kaysen.  Book Review:The Extent of Enterprise Monopoly in the United States, 1899-1939. G. Warren Nutter , 1953 .

[4]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  The R&D Master File Documentation , 1988 .

[5]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[6]  J. Lerner.  The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[7]  E. Eckard,et al.  Are Mega-Mergers Anticompetitive? Evidence from the First Great Merger Wave , 1998 .

[8]  Michael L. Katz,et al.  An Economist's Guide toU.S. v. Microsoft , 2001 .

[9]  S. Nickell.  Competition and Corporate Performance , 1996, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  M. C. Simón.  The Rise and Fall of Bank Control in the United States: 1890-1939 , 1998 .

[11]  M. R. Burns.  The Competitive Effects of Trust-Busting: A Portfolio Analysis , 1977, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  H. Adler.  Concentration of Control in American Industry , 1932 .

[13]  P. Aghion,et al.  Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth , 2002 .

[14]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[15]  Joel Mokyr,et al.  The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress , 1991 .

[16]  George Strauss,et al.  Tracking the Giant Corporation@@@Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. , 1991 .

[17]  D. Newbery,et al.  Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .

[18]  William E. Kovacic,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 14, Number 1—Winter 2000—Pages 43–60 Antitrust Policy: A Century of Economic and Legal Thinking , 2022 .

[19]  M. Lessnoff.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[20]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Industrial Research and Firm Size, Survival, and Growth in American Manufacturing, 1921–1946: An Assessment , 1983, The Journal of Economic History.

[21]  R. Blundell,et al.  Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms , 1999 .

[22]  Corporate concentration and public policy , 1942 .

[23]  Wilbur G. Lewellen,et al.  On the measurement of Tobin's q , 1997 .

[24]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[25]  P. Klemperer.  How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be , 1990 .

[26]  The Great Merger Movement in American Business, 1895–1904. By Naomi R. Lamoreaux. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985. xii + 208 pp. $29.95.) , 1986 .

[27]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[28]  H. W. Laidler,et al.  Concentration of control in American industry , 1932 .

[29]  R. Rajan,et al.  FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE, AND GROWTH , 2001 .

[30]  P. David,et al.  Early Twentieth Century Productivity Growth Dynamics: An Inquiry into the Economic History of "Our Ignorance" , 1999 .

[31]  J. Sutton.  Gibrat's Legacy , 1996 .

[32]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[33]  Naomi R. Lamoreaux,et al.  Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise ed. by Naomi R. Lamoreaux, Daniel M. G. Raff (review) , 1996, Technology and Culture.

[34]  E. Lindenberg,et al.  Tobin's q Ratio and Industrial Organization , 1981 .

[35]  Leonard S. Reich.  Research, Patents, and the Struggle to Control Radio: A Study of Big Business and the Uses of Industrial Research. " , 1977 .

[36]  P. Krugman.  History and Industry Location: The Case of the Manufacturing Belt , 1991 .

[37]  J. Schumpeter.  Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung , 1913 .

[38]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Vintage Organization Capital , 2001 .

[39]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change , 1984 .

[40]  C. V. Hise,et al.  Concentration and control : a solution of the trust problem in the United States . Credit and international trade : how they work in practice , 2008 .

[41]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[42]  R. Gilbert.  An Economist's Guide to U , 2001 .

[43]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[44]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .

[45]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 1999 .

[46]  E. Eckard,et al.  Why Regulate Insider Trading? Evidence from the First Great Merger Wave (1897-1903) , 2001 .

[47]  G. Nutter,et al.  The Extent of Enterprise Monopoly in the United States, 1899-1939. , 1952 .

[48]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Optimal Patent Length and Breadth , 1990 .

[49]  Paul A. David,et al.  COMPUTER AND DYNAMO: The Modern Productivity Paradox in a Not-Too Distant Mirror , 1989 .

[50]  R. Barro,et al.  The Stock Market and Investment , 1989 .

[51]  W. G. Shepherd.  The Treatment of Market Power: Antitrust, Regulation and Public Enterprise , 1975 .

[52]  Shorey Peterson,et al.  The Modern Corporation and Private Property. , 1933 .

[53]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[54]  Naomi R. Lamoreaux,et al.  Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise , 1997 .

[55]  Michael L. Katz,et al.  An Economist's Guide to U.S. V Microsoft , 2001 .

[56]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Schumpeter and Plausible Capitalism , 1992 .