Comparative performance of BESS and SMES in distribution network to improve power quality

The FACTS devices, like STATCOM, are becoming a part of the modern power system to improve the power system operation and power quality problems. Integrating the battery energy storage system (BESS)/superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) across the dc bus of the STATCOM can provide effective modulation of the real and reactive power. The dynamics of each of these differ because of their nature of energy storage. In this paper, comparative dynamic performances of these devices across the STATCOM are presented. The control strategy is proposed to integrate these devices to improve the active power management within the constraints of source supply to take the advantage of off-peak load condition. The simple hysteresis controller ensures the unity power factor and sinusoidal supply current. Proposed controller is designed to regulate the real and reactive power while keeping the dc bus voltage constant in BESS and SMES. Simulation is carried out using realistic power devices to study the dynamic performance of these schemes. The prototype results are given to validate the performance.

[1]  Laszlo Gyugyi,et al.  Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems , 1999 .

[2]  M.A. Daugherty,et al.  SSD operating experience , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[3]  Paulo F. Ribeiro,et al.  StatCom-SMES , 2003 .

[4]  J. Skiles,et al.  Power conversion system for diurnal load leveling with superconductive magnetic energy storage , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[5]  H. J. Boenig,et al.  Commissioning Tests of the Bonneville Power Administration 30 MJ Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage Unit , 1985, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[6]  S. Tsuji-Iio,et al.  Flexible Power Interconnection With SMES , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[7]  A.P.S. Meliopoulos,et al.  Directions of research on electric power quality , 1993 .

[8]  C. Luongo Superconducting storage systems: an overview , 1996 .

[9]  Mariesa L. Crow,et al.  Performance Indices for the Dynamic Performance of FACTS and FACTS with Energy Storage , 2004 .

[10]  T. Ise,et al.  Simultaneous Active and Reactive Power Control of Superconducting Magnet Energy Storage Using GTO Converter , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[11]  A. Tani,et al.  Behavior of a power conditioner for /spl mu/-SMES systems under unbalanced supply voltages and unbalanced loads , 1999, ISIE '99. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (Cat. No.99TH8465).

[12]  Mauricio Aredes,et al.  New concepts of instantaneous active and reactive powers in electrical systems with generic loads , 1993 .

[13]  Kamal Al-Haddad,et al.  DSP-based indirect-current-controlled STATCOM. Part 1: Evaluation of current control techniques , 2000 .

[14]  W. V. Torre,et al.  Improving power delivery through the application of superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) , 2001, 2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194).

[15]  K. K. Sen,et al.  STATCOM-STATic synchronous COMpensator: theory, modeling, and applications , 1999, IEEE Power Engineering Society. 1999 Winter Meeting (Cat. No.99CH36233).

[16]  Shyh-Jier Huang,et al.  Electric-power-quality improvement using parallel active-power conditioners , 1998 .

[17]  Hui Li,et al.  A multilevel power conditioning system for superconductive magnetic energy storage , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.