Using Natural Language Processing to Analyze Tutorial Dialogue Corpora Across Domains Modalities

Our research goal is to investigate whether previous findings and methods in the area of tutorial dialogue can be generalized across dialogue corpora that differ in domain (mechanics versus electricity in physics), modality (spoken versus typed), and tutor type (computer versus human). We first present methods for unifying our prior coding and analysis methods. We then show that many of our prior findings regarding student dialogue behaviors and learning not only generalize across corpora, but that our methodology yields additional new findings. Finally, we show that natural language processing can be used to automate some of these analyses.

[1]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Spoken Versus Typed Human and Computer Dialogue Tutoring , 2006, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[2]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  The relative impact of student affect on performance models in a spoken dialogue tutoring system , 2008, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[3]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  The "DeMAND" coding scheme: A "common language" for representing and analyzing student discourse , 2009, AIED.

[4]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  Content-Learning Correlations in Spoken Tutoring Dialogs at Word, Turn, and Discourse Levels , 2008, FLAIRS Conference.

[5]  Sandra Katz,et al.  Going Beyond the Problem Given: How Human Tutors Use Post-Solution Discussions to Support Transfer , 2003, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[6]  K. VanLehn,et al.  Why Do Only Some Events Cause Learning During Human Tutoring? , 2003 .

[7]  Claus Zinn,et al.  The Role of Initiative in Tutorial Dialogue , 2003, EACL.

[8]  S. B. Nolen,et al.  Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. , 1988 .

[9]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor , 2004 .

[10]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  The Architecture of Why2-Atlas: A Coach for Qualitative Physics Essay Writing , 2002, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[11]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  Correlations between dialogue acts and learning in spoken tutoring dialogues , 2006, Natural Language Engineering.

[12]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Diagnosing Natural Language Answers to Support Adaptive Tutoring , 2008, FLAIRS Conference.

[13]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  Responding to Student Uncertainty During Computer Tutoring: An Experimental Evaluation , 2008, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[14]  Sandra Katz,et al.  Going Beyond the Problem Given: How Human Tutors Use Post-practice Discussions to Support Transfer , 2002, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.