Patterns of morphospace occupation and mechanical performance in extant crocodilian skulls: A combined geometric morphometric and finite element modeling approach

Extant and fossil crocodilians have long been divided into taxonomic and/or ecological groups based on broad patterns of skull shape, particularly the relative length and width of the snout. However, these patterns have not been quantitatively analyzed in detail, and their biomechanical and functional implications are similarly understudied. Here, we use geometric morphometrics and finite element analysis to explore the patterns of variation in crocodilian skull morphology and the functional implications of those patterns. Our results indicate that skull shape variation in extant crocodiles is much more complex than previously recognized. Differences in snout length and width are the main components of shape variation, but these differences are correlated with changes in other regions of the skull. Additionally, there is considerable disparity within general classes such as longirostrine and brevirostrine forms. For example, Gavialis and Tomistoma occupy different parts of morphospace implying a significant difference in skull shape, despite the fact that both are traditionally considered longirostrine. Skull length and width also strongly influence the mechanical performance of the skull; long and narrow morphotypes (e.g., Tomistoma) experience the highest amount of stress during biting, whereas short and broad morphotypes (e.g., Caiman latirostris) experience the least amount of stress. Biomechanical stress and the hydrodynamic properties of the skull show a strong relationship with the distribution of crocodilians in skull morphospace, whereas phylogeny and biogeography show weak or no correlation. Therefore, ecological specializations related to feeding and foraging likely have the greatest influence on crocodilian skull shape. J. Morphol., 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  C. McHenry,et al.  Bite force to skull stress correlation - modelling the skull of Alligator mississippiensis , 2001 .

[2]  G. Rebêlo,et al.  Distribution and abundance of four caiman species (Crocodylia: Alligatoridae) in Jaú National Park, Amazonas, Brazil. , 2001, Revista de biologia tropical.

[3]  C. Brochu Crocodylian Snouts in Space and Time: Phylogenetic Approaches Toward Adaptive Radiation1 , 2001 .

[4]  John Gatesy,et al.  Inconsistencies in arguments for the supertree approach: supermatrices versus supertrees of Crocodylia. , 2004, Systematic biology.

[5]  L. Densmore,et al.  Evidence for placing the false gharial (Tomistoma schlegelii) into the family Gavialidae: inferences from nuclear gene sequences. , 2007, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[6]  Gjw Webb,et al.  Crocodylus johnstoni and C. porosus Coexisting in a Tidal River , 1983 .

[7]  A. Russell,et al.  The Crocodylomorpha at and between geological boundaries: the Baden-Powell approach to change? , 1997 .

[8]  M. Foote Contributions of individual taxa to overall morphological disparity , 1993, Paleobiology.

[9]  Callum F Ross,et al.  Comparison of beam theory and finite-element analysis with in vivo bone strain data from the alligator cranium. , 2005, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[10]  C. T. Stayton Morphological evolution of the lizard skull: A geometric morphometrics survey , 2005, Journal of morphology.

[11]  C. Brochu PHYLOGENETIC APPROACHES TOWARD CROCODYLIAN HISTORY , 2003 .

[12]  R. Owen,et al.  Molecular Systematics of the Order Crocodilia , 1989 .

[13]  C. Diefenbach Ampullarid Gastropod-Staple Food of Caiman latirostris? , 1979 .

[14]  P. Pritchard,et al.  Ecological correlates and evolutionary divergence in the skull of turtles: a geometric morphometric assessment. , 2004, Systematic biology.

[15]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. , 1998 .

[16]  D. Maddison,et al.  Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.6 , 2009 .

[17]  H. Endo,et al.  Comparative Functional Morphology of the Masticatory Apparatus in the Long‐snouted Crocodiles , 2002, Anatomia, histologia, embryologia.

[18]  J. Currey The evolution of the mechanical properties of amniote bone. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  A. Herrel,et al.  Relationships between head size, bite force, prey handling efficiency and diet in two sympatric lacertid lizards , 2002 .

[20]  M. Ruta,et al.  GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS OF THE SKULL ROOF OF STEREOSPONDYLS (AMPHIBIA: TEMNOSPONDYLI) , 2006 .

[21]  M. Taylor,et al.  Cranial Anatomy and Functional Morphology of Pliosaurus brachyspondylus (Reptilia: Plesiosauria) from the Upper Jurassic of Westbury, Wiltshire , 1993 .

[22]  C. Toft Resource Partitioning in Amphibians and Reptiles , 1985 .

[23]  A. Russell,et al.  The crocodylomorpha at and between geological boundaries , 1997 .

[24]  R. Lydekker Catalogue of the Fossil Reptilia and Amphibia in the British Museum (Natural History) , 1890, Nature.

[25]  A. J. Collins,et al.  Introduction To Multivariate Analysis , 1981 .

[26]  M. Taylor How tetrapods feed in water: a functional analysis by paradigm , 1987 .

[27]  C. McHenry,et al.  Biomechanics of the rostrum in crocodilians: a comparative analysis using finite-element modeling. , 2006, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[28]  Ian R Grosse,et al.  Finite-element analysis of biting behavior and bone stress in the facial skeletons of bats. , 2005, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[29]  Emily J Rayfield,et al.  Cranial mechanics and feeding in Tyrannosaurus rex , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  H. David Sheets,et al.  Geometric morphometrics for biologists : a primer , 2004 .

[31]  D. Swofford PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10 , 2002 .

[32]  W. Magnusson Habitat selection, parasites and injuries in Amazonian crocodilians , 1985 .

[33]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Ecological character displacement in Plethodon: biomechanical differences found from a geometric morphometric study. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  J. C. Herron Body Size, Spatial Distribution, and Microhabitat Use in the Caimans, Melanosuchus niger and Caiman crocodilus, in a Peruvian Lake , 1994 .

[35]  A. Abe,et al.  Functional and historical determinants of shape in the scapula of Xenarthran mammals: Evolution of a complex morphological structure , 1999, Journal of morphology.

[36]  F. D. Vree,et al.  CHAPTER 10 – Feeding in Crocodilians , 2000 .

[37]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[38]  M. Norell The Higher Level Relationships of the Extant Crocodylia , 1989 .

[39]  H. Larsson,et al.  The Giant Crocodyliform Sarcosuchus from the Cretaceous of Africa , 2001, Science.

[40]  D. F. Morrison,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Methods , 1968 .

[41]  J. A. Massare Tooth morphology and prey preference of Mesozoic marine reptiles , 1987 .

[42]  M. Foote THE EVOLUTION OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIVERSITY , 1997 .

[43]  Wilson,et al.  A long-snouted predatory dinosaur from africa and the evolution of spinosaurids , 1998, Science.

[44]  C Tristan Stayton,et al.  TESTING HYPOTHESES OF CONVERGENCE WITH MULTIVARIATE DATA: MORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL CONVERGENCE AMONG HERBIVOROUS LIZARDS , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  F. Robin O'Keefe,et al.  The evolution of plesiosaur and pliosaur morphotypes in the Plesiosauria (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) , 2002, Paleobiology.

[46]  M. Zelditch,et al.  The ontogenetic dynamics of shape disparity , 2003, Paleobiology.

[47]  J. Thorbjarnarson Fishing behavior of spectacled caiman in the Venezuelan Llanos , 1993 .

[48]  A. Lappin,et al.  The ontogeny of bite-force performance in American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) , 2003 .

[49]  M. Cavalcanti,et al.  Comparative ontogenetic shape changes in the skull of Caiman species (Crocodylia, Alligatoridae) , 1997, Journal of morphology.

[50]  W. Magnusson,et al.  Diets of Amazonian Crocodilians , 1987 .

[51]  P. O’Higgins,et al.  Inter-specific variation in Macropus crania: form, function and phylogeny , 2006 .

[52]  C. Kofron Status and habitats of the three African crocodiles in Liberia , 1992, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[53]  J. Thorbjarnarson Notes on the Feeding Behavior of the Gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) under Semi-Natural Conditions , 1990 .

[54]  A. Herrel,et al.  Evolution of bite performance in turtles , 2002 .

[55]  S. Salisbury,et al.  The origin of modern crocodyliforms: new evidence from the Cretaceous of Australia , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  A. Burstein,et al.  The Mechanical Properties of Cortical Bone , 1974 .

[57]  Mason B. Meers Maximum Bite Force and Prey Size of Tyrannosaurus rex and Their Relationships to the Inference of Feeding Behavior , 2002 .

[58]  C. D. Hulsey,et al.  Projecting mechanics into morphospace: disparity in the feeding system of labrid fishes , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  C. Brochu,et al.  Morphology, fossils, divergence timing, and the phylogenetic relationships of Gavialis. , 1997, Systematic biology.

[60]  N. Mantel The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.

[61]  M. Wills,et al.  The shape of life: how much is written in stone? , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[62]  A. Herrel,et al.  Bite performance and morphology in a population of Darwin's finches: implications for the evolution of beak shape , 2005 .