Sensitivity analysis and optimization of nodal point placement for vibration reduction

Abstract A method is developed for sensitivity analysis and optimization of nodal point locations in connection with vibration reduction. A straightforward derivation of the expression for the derivative of nodal locations is given, and the role of the derivative in assessing design trends is demonstrated. An optimization process is developed in which added lumped masses on the structure are used as design variables to move the node to a preselected location—for example to where a low response amplitude is required or to a point which makes the mode shape nearly orthogonal to the force distribution, thereby minimizing the generalized force. The optimization formulation leads to values for added masses that adjust a nodal location while minimizing the total amount of added mass required to do so. As an example, the node of the second mode of a cantilever box beam model of a rotor blade is relocated to coincide with the centroid of a prescribed force distribution, thereby reducing the generalized force substantially without adding excessive mass. A comparison with an optimization formulation that directly minimizes the generalized force indicates that nodal placement gives essentially a minimum generalized force when the node is appropriately placed.

[1]  G. A. Pierce,et al.  Helicopter vibration suppression using simple pendulum absorbers on the rotor blade , 1984 .

[2]  J. L. Walsh,et al.  Application of mathematical optimization procedures to a structural model of a large finite-element wing , 1986 .

[3]  Hirokazu Miura,et al.  Applications of numerical optimization methods to helicopter design problems: A survey , 1984 .

[4]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Structural optimization by generalized, multilevel optimization , 1985 .

[5]  R. H. Blackwell,et al.  Blade Design for Reduced Helicopter Vibration , 1983 .

[6]  P. Shanthakumaran,et al.  Aeroelastic tailoring of rotor blades for vibration reduction in forward flight , 1983 .

[7]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  Application of modern structural optimization to vibration reduction in rotorcraft , 1984 .

[8]  B. Wang,et al.  Optimal frequency response shaping by appendant structures , 1984 .

[9]  R. E. Hutton,et al.  Effect of Spanwise and Chordwise Mass Distribution on Rotor Blade Cyclic Stresses , 1956 .

[10]  R. B. Taylor,et al.  Helicopter Vibration Reduction by Rotor Blade Modal Shaping , 1982 .

[11]  Richard B. Nelson,et al.  Simplified calculation of eigenvector derivatives , 1976 .

[12]  A. Palazzolo,et al.  SYNTHESIS OF DYNAMIC VIBRATION ABSORBERS. , 1985 .

[13]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  Optimum design of rotor blades for vibration reduction in forward flight , 1984 .

[14]  George W. Brooks,et al.  A dynamic-model study of the effect of added weights and other structural variations on the blade bending strains of an experimental two-blade jet-driven helicopter in hovering and forward flight , 1955 .

[15]  G. Reichert,et al.  Helicopter vibration control: a survey , 1980 .

[16]  R. Laurenson.  Modal Analysis of Rotating Flexible Structures , 1976 .

[17]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  CONMIN: A FORTRAN program for constrained function minimization: User's manual , 1973 .

[18]  J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski.  Structural optimization: Challenges and opportunities , 1983 .

[19]  M. W. Davis,et al.  Optimization of helicopter rotor blade design for minimum vibration , 1984 .

[20]  L. Schmit,et al.  Some Approximation Concepts for Structural Synthesis , 1974 .

[21]  R. L. Bennett,et al.  Aeroelastic-aerodynamic optimization of high speed helicopter-compound rotor , 1984 .

[22]  David A. Peters,et al.  Design of helicopter rotor blades for desired placement of natural frequencies , 1984 .

[23]  R. B. Taylor,et al.  Helicopter rotor blade design for minimum vibration , 1984 .