Scaling relationship between tree respiration rates and biomass

The WBE theory proposed by West, Brown and Enquist predicts that larger plant respiration rate, R, scales to the three-quarters power of body size, M. However, studies on the R versus M relationship for larger plants (i.e. trees larger than saplings) have not been reported. Published respiration rates of field-grown trees (saplings and larger trees) were examined to test this relationship. Our results showed that for larger trees, aboveground respiration rates RA scaled as the 0.82-power of aboveground biomass MA, and that total respiration rates RT scaled as the 0.85-power of total biomass MT, both of which significantly deviated from the three-quarters scaling law predicted by the WBE theory, and which agreed with 0.81–0.84-power scaling of biomass to respiration across the full range of measured tree sizes for an independent dataset reported by Reich et al. (Reich et al. 2006 Nature 439, 457–461). By contrast, R scaled nearly isometrically with M in saplings. We contend that the scaling exponent of plant metabolism is close to unity for saplings and decreases (but is significantly larger than three-quarters) as trees grow, implying that there is no universal metabolic scaling in plants.

[1]  W. Calder.  Size, Function, and Life History , 1988 .

[2]  Mark G Tjoelker,et al.  Thermal acclimation and the dynamic response of plant respiration to temperature. , 2003, Trends in plant science.

[3]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants , 1999, Nature.

[4]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems , 1999, Nature.

[5]  Mark G. Tjoelker,et al.  Universal scaling of respiratory metabolism, size and nitrogen in plants , 2006, Nature.

[6]  An approach to estimating respiration of forest community and its application , 1999 .

[7]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Biological scaling: Does the exception prove the rule? , 2007, Nature.

[8]  A. Mäkelä,et al.  Crown ratio influences allometric scaling in trees. , 2006, Ecology.

[9]  AGE-RELATED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANNUAL PRODUCTIVITY AND BODY SIZE OF TREES: TESTING THE METABOLIC THEORY , 2009 .

[10]  James H. Brown,et al.  A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology , 1997, Science.

[11]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Effects of Climate Change on Plant Respiration. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[12]  Stephanie A. Bohlman,et al.  Testing metabolic ecology theory for allometric scaling of tree size, growth and mortality in tropical forests. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[13]  J. Weitz,et al.  Re-examination of the "3/4-law" of metabolism. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Steven L. Chown,et al.  Mean mass-specific metabolic rates are strikingly similar across life's major domains: Evidence for life's metabolic optimum , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Botanical Scaling. (Book Reviews: Plant Allometry. The Scaling of Form and Process.) , 1994 .

[16]  D. S. Glazier.  A unifying explanation for diverse metabolic scaling in animals and plants , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[17]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Lack of Evidence for 3/4 Scaling of Metabolism in Terrestrial Plants , 2005 .

[18]  K. Niklas.  Plant allometry: is there a grand unifying theory? , 2004, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[19]  P. Reich,et al.  Ontogenetic shift in the scaling of dark respiration with whole-plant mass in seven shrub species , 2010 .

[20]  A. P. Abaimov,et al.  Mixed-power scaling of whole-plant respiration from seedlings to giant trees , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  K J Niklas,et al.  Invariant scaling relationships for interspecific plant biomass production rates and body size , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.