Recovery from short-term adaptation in single neurons in the cochlear nucleus

Recovery from short-term adaptation was measured in single neurons in the cochlear nucleus using a forward masking stimulus paradigm. The response to a short-duration, low-level probe tone at a unit's characteristic frequency (CF) was measured before and after presentation of a masker tone at the unit's CF. The degree of adaptation was defined as the ratio of firing to the probe in the adapted and unadapted conditions. The level of the masker and time difference between the masker offset and probe onset ('DT') were varied. As DT increased, the response to the probe increased in most Primarylike, Primarylike-notch, and Chopper units. Recovery was approximately linear in log time for most of these units. However, approximately half the Pauser/Buildup and On units showed very different recovery patterns, ranging from no adaptation to very non-linear recovery patterns. The results suggest that little alteration in the recovery process occurs between the auditory nerve and Primarylike, Primarylike-notch, and Chopper units, but that significant changes in the recovery process occur in Pauser-Buildup and On units.

[1]  Evoked response ‘forward masking’ patterns in chinchillas with temporary hearing loss , 1987, Hearing Research.

[2]  A. Møller Unit responses in the cochlear nucleus of the rat to sweep tones. , 1969, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[3]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  On Some Poststimulatory Effects at the Threshold of Audibility , 1959 .

[4]  Poststimulatory Effects in the Medial Geniculate Body of Guinea Pigs , 1981 .

[5]  A. Starr Suppression of single unit activity in cochlear nucleus of the cat following sound stimulation. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  F B Simmons,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.

[7]  P J Abbas,et al.  AP responses in forward-masking paradigms and their relationship to responses of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Encoding timing and intensity in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  R L Freyman,et al.  Temporal resolution in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Psychophysical and Physiological Aspects of Auditory Temporal Processing in Listeners with Noise-Induced Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 1986 .

[11]  W. G. Sokolich Improved acoustic system for auditory research , 1977 .

[12]  Gregory P. Widin,et al.  Intensive and temporal effects in pure‐tone forward masking , 1979 .

[13]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Physiological studies on neurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of cat. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Physiological response properties of cells labeled intracellularly with horseradish peroxidase in cat dorsal cochlear nucleus , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  N. Kiang,et al.  Single unit activity in the posteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  P. Dallos,et al.  Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  L. Elliot Backward and Forward Masking of Probe Tones of Different Frequencies , 1962 .

[18]  E M Relkin,et al.  A reexamination of forward masking in the auditory nerve. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  R L Smith,et al.  Adaptation, saturation, and physiological masking in single auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R. Shannon Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[21]  Auditory temporal masking: an electrophysiological study of single neurons in the cat's cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus. , 1971, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[22]  R L Smith,et al.  Conservation of adapting components in auditory-nerve responses. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Robert P Carlyon,et al.  The development and decline of forward masking , 1988, Hearing Research.

[24]  L. Feth,et al.  Effects of masker duration in pure-tone forward masking. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  R. Smith Short-term adaptation in single auditory nerve fibers: some poststimulatory effects. , 1977 .

[26]  J. Eggermont,et al.  Cochlear Adaptation In Guinea Pigs , 1973 .

[27]  D A Godfrey,et al.  Single unit activity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the cat , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  W. Jesteadt,et al.  Forward masking as a function of frequency, masker level, and signal delay. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Studies in short-duration auditory fatigue. I. Frequency differences as a function of intensity. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  T. Mast Study of single units of the cochlear nucleus of the chinchilla. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  H. Duifhuis Consequences of peripheral frequency selectivity for nonsimultaneous masking. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.