A simple stimulatory device for evoking point-like tactile stimuli: a searchlight for LFP to spike transitions.

Current neurophysiological research has the aim to develop methodologies to investigate the signal route from neuron to neuron, namely in the transitions from spikes to Local Field Potentials (LFPs) and from LFPs to spikes. LFPs have a complex dependence on spike activity and their relation is still poorly understood(1). The elucidation of these signal relations would be helpful both for clinical diagnostics (e.g. stimulation paradigms for Deep Brain Stimulation) and for a deeper comprehension of neural coding strategies in normal and pathological conditions (e.g. epilepsy, Parkinson disease, chronic pain). To this aim, one has to solve technical issues related to stimulation devices, stimulation paradigms and computational analyses. Therefore, a custom-made stimulation device was developed in order to deliver stimuli well regulated in space and time that does not incur in mechanical resonance. Subsequently, as an exemplification, a set of reliable LFP-spike relationships was extracted. The performance of the device was investigated by extracellular recordings, jointly spikes and LFP responses to the applied stimuli, from the rat Primary Somatosensory cortex. Then, by means of a multi-objective optimization strategy, a predictive model for spike occurrence based on LFPs was estimated. The application of this paradigm shows that the device is adequately suited to deliver high frequency tactile stimulation, outperforming common piezoelectric actuators. As a proof of the efficacy of the device, the following results were presented: 1) the timing and reliability of LFP responses well match the spike responses, 2) LFPs are sensitive to the stimulation history and capture not only the average response but also the trial-to-trial fluctuations in the spike activity and, finally, 3) by using the LFP signal it is possible to estimate a range of predictive models that capture different aspects of the spike activity.

[1]  Arthur Gretton,et al.  Inferring spike trains from local field potentials. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  Correcting for the sampling bias problem in spike train information measures. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  R. Quian Quiroga,et al.  Unsupervised Spike Detection and Sorting with Wavelets and Superparamagnetic Clustering , 2004, Neural Computation.

[4]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[5]  Guglielmo Foffani,et al.  Computational role of large receptive fields in the primary somatosensory cortex. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Jonathan D. Victor,et al.  Metric-space analysis of spike trains: theory, algorithms and application , 1998, q-bio/0309031.

[7]  N. C. Singh,et al.  Estimating spatio-temporal receptive fields of auditory and visual neurons from their responses to natural stimuli , 2001 .

[8]  Bijan Pesaran,et al.  Uncovering the Mysterious Origins of Local Field Potentials , 2009, Neuron.

[9]  Antonio G. Zippo,et al.  Predicting Spike Occurrence and Neuronal Responsiveness from LFPs in Primary Somatosensory Cortex , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  Robert C. Liu,et al.  Predicting stimulus-locked single unit spiking from cortical local field potentials , 2010, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[11]  P. Delmas,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of mechanotransduction in mammalian sensory neurons , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.