Dual-task automatization: The key role of sensory–motor modality compatibility
暂无分享,去创建一个
Eric Ruthruff | François Maquestiaux | Alexis Defer | Stéphane Ibrahime | E. Ruthruff | F. Maquestiaux | Alexis Defer | A. Defer | S. Ibrahime
[1] E. Hazeltine,et al. Do small dual-task costs reflect ideomotor compatibility or the absence of crosstalk? , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[2] Eric Ruthruff,et al. How strategic is the central bottleneck: can it be overcome by trying harder? , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[3] J. C. Johnston,et al. How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening? , 2006, Psychological research.
[4] Jennifer M. Glass,et al. Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck , 2001, Psychological science.
[5] H. Pashler. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.
[6] J. C. Johnston,et al. Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect , 1999 .
[7] Robert Borger,et al. The Refractory Period and Serial Choice-reactions , 1963 .
[8] E. Hazeltine,et al. Investigating perfect timesharing: the relationship between IM-compatible tasks and dual-task performance. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[9] H Pashler,et al. Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[10] Eric Ruthruff,et al. Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment , 2008, Memory & cognition.
[11] Timothy A. Wifall,et al. Searching working memory for the source of dual-task costs , 2011, Psychological research.
[12] R. Remington,et al. The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.
[13] Iring Koch,et al. The role of input–output modality compatibility in task switching , 2011, Psychological research.
[14] E. Ruthruff,et al. Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: declining automaticity with advancing age. , 2010, Psychology and aging.
[15] W. Prinz. A common-coding approach to perception and action , 1990 .
[16] M. Masson,et al. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[17] Andrea M Philipp,et al. The role of sensory-motor modality compatibility in language processing , 2015, Psychological Research.
[18] I. Koch,et al. Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching. , 2015, Experimental psychology.
[19] Eliot Hazeltine,et al. What causes residual dual-task interference after practice? , 2006, Psychological research.
[20] A. Greenwald,et al. On doing two things at once. II. Elimination of the psychological refractory period effect. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.
[21] A. Greenwald,et al. Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. , 1970, Psychological review.
[22] Jennifer M. Glass,et al. Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. , 1999 .
[23] J. C. Johnston,et al. Why practice reduces dual-task interference. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[24] Ritske de Jong,et al. Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance , 1993 .
[25] G. Aschersleben,et al. The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[26] L. Karlin,et al. Effects of Number of Alternatives on the Psychological Refractory Period , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[27] Paul Bertelson,et al. Refractory period of c-reactions , 1969 .
[28] J. C. Johnston,et al. Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .
[29] I. Koch,et al. Modality-specific effects on crosstalk in task switching: evidence from modality compatibility using bimodal stimulation , 2016, Psychological research.
[30] H. Pashler,et al. Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[31] Lost ability to automatize task performance in old age , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[32] I. Koch,et al. Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[33] Eliot Hazeltine,et al. Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[34] W. Prinz. Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .
[35] J. C. Johnston,et al. Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[36] H. Pashler,et al. Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[37] W. Prinz,et al. Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination , 2001, Nature.
[38] A. Welford. THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .
[39] D E Kieras,et al. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.
[40] David E. Kieras,et al. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .
[41] D. Strayer,et al. Supertaskers: Profiles in extraordinary multitasking ability , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.