Insights into the Activity and Deactivation of the Methanol-to-Olefins Process over Different Small-Pore Zeolites As Studied with Operando UV–vis Spectroscopy

The nature and evolution of the hydrocarbon pool (HP) species during the Methanol-to-Olefins (MTO) process for three small-pore zeolite catalysts, with a different framework consisting of large cages interconnected by small eight-ring windows (CHA, DDR, and LEV) was studied at reaction temperatures between 350 and 450 °C using a combination of operando UV–vis spectroscopy and online gas chromatography. It was found that small differences in cage size, shape, and pore structure of the zeolite frameworks result in the generation of different hydrocarbon pool species. More specifically, it was found that the large cage of CHA results in the formation of a wide variety of hydrocarbon pool species, mostly alkylated benzenes and naphthalenes. In the DDR cage, 1-methylnaphthalene is preferentially formed, while the small LEV cage generally contains fewer hydrocarbon pool species. The nature and evolution of these hydrocarbon pool species was linked with the stage of the reaction using a multivariate analysis of the operando UV–vis spectra. In the 3-D pore network of CHA, the reaction temperature has only a minor effect on the performance of the MTO catalyst. However, for the 2-D pore networks of DDR and LEV, an increase in the applied reaction temperature resulted in a dramatic increase in catalytic activity. For all zeolites in this study, the role of the hydrocarbon species changes with reaction temperature. This effect is most clear in DDR, in which diamantane and 1-methylnaphthalene are deactivating species at a reaction temperature of 350 °C, whereas at higher temperatures diamantane formation is not observed and 1-methylnaphthalene is an active species. This results in a different amount and nature of coke species in the deactivated catalyst, depending on zeolite framework and reaction temperature.

[1]  F. Kapteijn,et al.  Consequences of secondary zeolite growth on catalytic performance in DMTO studied over DDR and CHA , 2017 .

[2]  Mark E. Davis,et al.  Steam-dealuminated, OSDA-free RHO and KFI-type zeolites as catalysts for the methanol-to-olefins reaction , 2016 .

[3]  A. Corma,et al.  Improving the catalytic performance of SAPO-18 for the methanol-to-olefins (MTO) reaction by controlling the Si distribution and crystal size , 2016 .

[4]  F. Kapteijn,et al.  Methanol-to-olefins process over zeolite catalysts with DDR topology: effect of composition and structural defects on catalytic performance , 2016 .

[5]  Veronique Van Speybroeck,et al.  Insight into the Effect of Water on the Methanol-to-Olefins Conversion in H-SAPO-34 from Molecular Simulations and in Situ Microspectroscopy , 2016 .

[6]  Mark E. Davis,et al.  Effect of Heteroatom Concentration in SSZ-13 on the Methanol-to-Olefins Reaction , 2016 .

[7]  K. Lillerud,et al.  The formation and degradation of active species during methanol conversion over protonated zeotype catalysts. , 2015, Chemical Society reviews.

[8]  Mark E. Davis,et al.  Effect of Pore and Cage Size on the Formation of Aromatic Intermediates During the Methanol-to-Olefins Reaction , 2015, Topics in Catalysis.

[9]  Yingxu Wei,et al.  Cavity Controls the Selectivity: Insights of Confinement Effects on MTO Reaction , 2015 .

[10]  Romà Tauler,et al.  MCR-ALS GUI 2.0: New features and applications , 2015 .

[11]  Landong Li,et al.  Understanding the Early Stages of the Methanol-to-Olefin Conversion on H-SAPO-34 , 2015 .

[12]  C. Vogt,et al.  Combined Operando UV/Vis/IR Spectroscopy Reveals the Role of Methoxy and Aromatic Species during the Methanol‐to‐Olefins Reaction over H‐SAPO‐34 , 2014 .

[13]  F. Kapteijn,et al.  Adsorptive characterization of porous solids: Error analysis guides the way , 2014 .

[14]  F. Jentoft,et al.  The Role of Cyclopentadienium Ions in Methanol-to-Hydrocarbons Chemistry , 2014 .

[15]  Abdullah M. Asiri,et al.  Single-catalyst particle spectroscopy of alcohol-to-olefins conversions : Comparison between SAPO-34 and SSZ-13 , 2014 .

[16]  Zhongmin Liu,et al.  Spatial confinement effects of cage-type SAPO molecular sieves on product distribution and coke formation in methanol-to-olefin reaction , 2014 .

[17]  A. Corma,et al.  Synthesis Strategies for Preparing Useful Small Pore Zeolites and Zeotypes for Gas Separations and Catalysis , 2014 .

[18]  K. Lillerud,et al.  Methanol Conversion to Hydrocarbons (MTH) Over H-ITQ-13 (ITH) Zeolite , 2014, Topics in Catalysis.

[19]  B. Weckhuysen,et al.  Identification of intermediates in zeolite-catalyzed reactions by in situ UV/Vis microspectroscopy and a complementary set of molecular simulations. , 2013, Chemistry.

[20]  B. Weckhuysen,et al.  Interplay between nanoscale reactivity and bulk performance of H-ZSM-5 catalysts during the methanol-to-hydrocarbons reaction , 2013 .

[21]  Abdullah M. Asiri,et al.  Single-particle spectroscopy on large SAPO-34 crystals at work: methanol-to-olefin versus ethanol-to-olefin processes. , 2013, Chemistry.

[22]  T. Tatsumi,et al.  Methanol conversion to lower olefins over RHO type zeolite , 2013 .

[23]  A. Beale,et al.  Operando Raman spectroscopy study on the deactivation of Pt/Al2O3 and Pt-Sn/Al2O3 propane dehydrogenation catalysts. , 2013, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[24]  J. Janek,et al.  Large zeolite H-ZSM-5 crystals as models for the methanol-to-hydrocarbons process: bridging the gap between single-particle examination and bulk catalyst analysis. , 2013, Chemistry.

[25]  H. Schulz,et al.  Pools and Constraints in Methanol Conversion to Olefins and Fuels on Zeolite HZSM5 , 2013, Topics in Catalysis.

[26]  R. Krishna,et al.  Influence of adsorption thermodynamics on guest diffusivities in nanoporous crystalline materials. , 2013, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[27]  Yangdong Wang,et al.  Insights into the reaction mechanism of methanol-to-olefins conversion in HSAPO-34 from first principles: Are olefins themselves the dominating hydrocarbon pool species? , 2013 .

[28]  Landong Li,et al.  Mechanisms of the Deactivation of SAPO-34 Materials with Different Crystal Sizes Applied as MTO Catalysts , 2013 .

[29]  Aditya Bhan,et al.  Mechanism of the Catalytic Conversion of Methanol to Hydrocarbons , 2013 .

[30]  B. Weckhuysen,et al.  Mechanistic Studies on Chabazite‐Type Methanol‐to‐Olefin Catalysts: Insights from Time‐Resolved UV/Vis Microspectroscopy Combined with Theoretical Simulations , 2013 .

[31]  De Chen,et al.  A methanol to olefins review: Diffusion, coke formation and deactivation on SAPO type catalysts , 2012 .

[32]  Mark E. Davis,et al.  Effect of Cage Size on the Selective Conversion of Methanol to Light Olefins , 2012 .

[33]  K. Lillerud,et al.  Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons: how zeolite cavity and pore size controls product selectivity. , 2012, Angewandte Chemie.

[34]  B. Weckhuysen,et al.  X-ray imaging of zeolite particles at the nanoscale: influence of steaming on the state of aluminum and the methanol-to-olefin reaction. , 2012, Angewandte Chemie.

[35]  Yingxu Wei,et al.  Generation of diamondoid hydrocarbons as confined compounds in SAPO-34 catalyst in the conversion of methanol. , 2012, Chemical communications.

[36]  Ian M. Hill,et al.  Kinetics and mechanism of olefin methylation reactions on zeolites , 2011 .

[37]  B. Weckhuysen,et al.  Core-shell H-ZSM-5/silicalite-1 composites: Brønsted acidity and catalyst deactivation at the individual particle level. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[38]  Unni Olsbye,et al.  Coke formation during the methanol-to-olefin conversion: in situ microspectroscopy on individual H-ZSM-5 crystals with different Brønsted acidity. , 2011, Chemistry.

[39]  Landong Li,et al.  Methanol-to-Olefin Conversion on Silicoaluminophosphate Catalysts: Effect of Brønsted Acid Sites and Framework Structures , 2011 .

[40]  Silvia Bordiga,et al.  Conversion of methanol over 10-ring zeolites with differing volumes at channel intersections: comparison of TNU-9, IM-5, ZSM-11 and ZSM-5. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[41]  F. Kapteijn,et al.  Shape selective methanol to olefins over highly thermostable DDR catalysts , 2011 .

[42]  Marcin Wojdyr,et al.  Fityk: a general-purpose peak fitting program , 2010 .

[43]  M. Vandichel,et al.  The Effect of Confined Space on the Growth of Naphthalenic Species in a Chabazite‐Type Catalyst: A Molecular Modeling Study , 2009 .

[44]  C. Bostedt,et al.  Optical response of diamond nanocrystals as a function of particle size, shape, and symmetry. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[45]  G. Seo,et al.  IR study on methanol-to-olefin reaction over zeolites with different pore structures and acidities , 2009 .

[46]  Unni Olsbye,et al.  Space- and time-resolved in-situ spectroscopy on the coke formation in molecular sieves: methanol-to-olefin conversion over H-ZSM-5 and H-SAPO-34. , 2008, Chemistry.

[47]  Takashi Tatsumi,et al.  The study of methanol-to-olefin over proton type aluminosilicate CHA zeolites , 2008 .

[48]  P. Beato,et al.  Conversion of Methanol to Hydrocarbons: Spectroscopic Characterization of Carbonaceous Species Formed over H-ZSM-5 , 2008 .

[49]  Jae Youl Lee,et al.  Effects of cage shape and size of 8-membered ring molecular sieves on their deactivation in methanol-to-olefin (MTO) reactions , 2008 .

[50]  Jun Huang,et al.  In situ MAS NMR-UV/Vis investigation of H-SAPO-34 catalysts partially coked in the methanol-to-olefin conversion under continuous-flow conditions and of their regeneration , 2007 .

[51]  B. Weckhuysen,et al.  Real time quantitative Raman spectroscopy of supported metal oxide catalysts without the need of an internal standard. , 2005, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[52]  Avelino Corma,et al.  Light cracked naphtha processing: Controlling chemistry for maximum propylene production , 2005 .

[53]  P. Galli,et al.  Polyolefins: The most promising large‐volume materials for the 21st century , 2004 .

[54]  K. Lillerud,et al.  Spectroscopic evidence for a persistent benzenium cation in zeolite H-beta. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[55]  B. Weckhuysen,et al.  Operando spectroscopic investigation of supported metal oxide catalysts by combined time-resolved UV-VIS/Raman/on-line mass spectrometry , 2003 .

[56]  Weiguo Song,et al.  The mechanism of methanol to hydrocarbon catalysis. , 2003, Accounts of chemical research.

[57]  Weiguo Song,et al.  Selective Synthesis of Methylnaphthalenes in HSAPO-34 Cages and Their Function as Reaction Centers in Methanol-to-Olefin Catalysis , 2001 .

[58]  József Valyon,et al.  On the interpretation of the NH3-TPD patterns of H-ZSM-5 and H-mordenite , 2001 .

[59]  P. Magnoux,et al.  Organic chemistry of coke formation , 2001 .

[60]  J. Nagy,et al.  Generation, Characterization, and Transformations of Unsaturated Carbenium Ions in Zeolites. , 1999, Chemical reviews.

[61]  H. Knözinger,et al.  IR spectroscopy of small and weakly interacting molecular probes for acidic and basic zeolites , 1998 .

[62]  Ivar M. Dahl,et al.  On the reaction mechanism for propene formation in the MTO reaction over SAPO-34 , 1993 .

[63]  P. Magnoux,et al.  Coking and deactivation of zeolites: Influence of the Pore Structure , 1989 .

[64]  D. W. Johnson,et al.  Synthesis and Characterisation of Crystalline Aluminosilicate Sigma-1. , 1988 .