Exploiting Task Constraints for Self-Calibrated Brain-Machine Interface Control Using Error-Related Potentials

This paper presents a new approach for self-calibration BCI for reaching tasks using error-related potentials. The proposed method exploits task constraints to simultaneously calibrate the decoder and control the device, by using a robust likelihood function and an ad-hoc planner to cope with the large uncertainty resulting from the unknown task and decoder. The method has been evaluated in closed-loop online experiments with 8 users using a previously proposed BCI protocol for reaching tasks over a grid. The results show that it is possible to have a usable BCI control from the beginning of the experiment without any prior calibration. Furthermore, comparisons with simulations and previous results obtained using standard calibration hint that both the quality of recorded signals and the performance of the system were comparable to those obtained with a standard calibration approach.

[1]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Calibration-Free BCI Based Control , 2014, AAAI.

[2]  Iñaki Iturrate,et al.  Shared-control brain-computer interface for a two dimensional reaching task using EEG error-related potentials , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[3]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian data analysis. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[4]  Motoaki Kawanabe,et al.  Toward Unsupervised Adaptation of LDA for Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  H. Flor,et al.  A spelling device for the paralysed , 1999, Nature.

[6]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Subject-independent mental state classification in single trials , 2009, Neural Networks.

[7]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  True Zero-Training Brain-Computer Interfacing – An Online Study , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  J. M. Carmena,et al.  Closed-Loop Decoder Adaptation on Intermediate Time-Scales Facilitates Rapid BMI Performance Improvements Independent of Decoder Initialization Conditions , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Iñaki Iturrate,et al.  Using frequency-domain features for the generalization of EEG error-related potentials among different tasks , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[10]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Reducing Calibration Time For Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Clustering Approach , 2006, NIPS.

[11]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Interactive Learning from Unlabeled Instructions , 2014, UAI.

[12]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[13]  Ricardo Chavarriaga,et al.  Minimizing calibration time using inter-subject information of single-trial recognition of error potentials in brain-computer interfaces , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  R Chavarriaga,et al.  Learning From EEG Error-Related Potentials in Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  Christa Neuper,et al.  Autocalibration and Recurrent Adaptation: Towards a Plug and Play Online ERD-BCI , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  J. A. Wilson,et al.  Two-dimensional movement control using electrocorticographic signals in humans , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[17]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components — A tutorial , 2011, NeuroImage.

[18]  I Iturrate,et al.  Task-dependent signal variations in EEG error-related potentials for brain–computer interfaces , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  Olivier Ledoit,et al.  Honey, I Shrunk the Sample Covariance Matrix , 2003 .

[20]  Benjamin Schrauwen,et al.  A Bayesian Model for Exploiting Application Constraints to Enable Unsupervised Training of a P300-based BCI , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  C. Neuper,et al.  Combining Brain–Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[22]  M Congedo,et al.  A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[23]  Jose M. Carmena,et al.  Closed-Loop Decoder Adaptation Shapes Neural Plasticity for Skillful Neuroprosthetic Control , 2014, Neuron.

[24]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Co-adaptive calibration to improve BCI efficiency , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[25]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Learning from other subjects helps reducing Brain-Computer Interface calibration time , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[26]  Fabien Lotte.  Generating Artificial EEG Signals To Reduce BCI Calibration Time , 2011 .

[27]  W. A. Sarnacki,et al.  Electroencephalographic (EEG) control of three-dimensional movement , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[28]  Ricardo Chavarriaga,et al.  Errare machinale est: the use of error-related potentials in brain-machine interfaces , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[29]  Benjamin Blankertz,et al.  Towards a Cure for BCI Illiteracy , 2009, Brain Topography.