Automated Recommendation for Cervical Cancer Screening and Surveillance

Because of the complexity of cervical cancer prevention guidelines, clinicians often fail to follow best-practice recommendations. Moreover, existing clinical decision support (CDS) systems generally recommend a cervical cytology every three years for all female patients, which is inappropriate for patients with abnormal findings that require surveillance at shorter intervals. To address this problem, we developed a decision tree-based CDS system that integrates national guidelines to provide comprehensive guidance to clinicians. Validation was performed in several iterations by comparing recommendations generated by the system with those of clinicians for 333 patients. The CDS system extracted relevant patient information from the electronic health record and applied the guideline model with an overall accuracy of 87%. Providers without CDS assistance needed an average of 1 minute 39 seconds to decide on recommendations for management of abnormal findings. Overall, our work demonstrates the feasibility and potential utility of automated recommendation system for cervical cancer screening and surveillance.

[1]  Nedra Garrett,et al.  Using computerized clinical decision support for latent tuberculosis infection screening. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[2]  C. Forbes,et al.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. , 2021, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  Katrina M. Krause,et al.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? , 2003, American journal of public health.

[4]  Ellen Peters,et al.  The Impact of a Novel Computer-Based Decision Aid on Shared Decision Making for Colorectal Cancer Screening , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  G. Rutten,et al.  Combined Task Delegation, Computerized Decision Support, and Feedback Improve Cardiovascular Risk for Type 2 Diabetic Patients , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[6]  Hongfang Liu,et al.  Workflow-based Data Reconciliation for Clinical Decision Support: Case of Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance , 2013, AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science.

[7]  M. Schiffman,et al.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[8]  Diane Solomon,et al.  2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  M. Duggan,et al.  An Audit of the Cervical Cancer Screening Histories of 246 Women With Carcinoma , 2012, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[10]  Jesse C. Crosson,et al.  Diabetes Flow Sheet Use Associated With Guideline Adherence , 2008, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[11]  S. Wacholder,et al.  Risk estimation for the next generation of prevention programmes for cervical cancer. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  Li Zhi-gang,et al.  2006 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women with Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests , 2008 .

[13]  E. Franco,et al.  Process of care failures in invasive cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[14]  American society for colposcopy and cervical pathology. , 1997, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[15]  Hongfang Liu,et al.  Clinical Decision Support for Colonoscopy Surveillance Using Natural Language Processing , 2012, 2012 IEEE Second International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, Imaging and Systems Biology.

[16]  J. Sorosky,et al.  Lack of Adherence to Practice Guidelines for Women With Atypical Glandular Cells on Cervical Cytology , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  Clement J. McDonald,et al.  What can natural language processing do for clinical decision support? , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[18]  ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 131: Screening for cervical cancer. , 2012, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  Grand challenges in clinical decision support , 2008, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[20]  Michael D. Reis,et al.  Primary care physicians' awareness and adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines in Texas. , 2006, Preventive medicine.

[21]  Jane J. Kim Opportunities to improve cervical cancer screening in the United States. , 2012, The Milbank quarterly.

[22]  Hongfang Liu,et al.  Clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[23]  Jacques Bouaud,et al.  A Before-After Study Using OncoDoc, a Guideline-Based Decision Support-System on Breast Cancer Management: Impact upon Physician Prescribing Behaviour , 2001, MedInfo.

[24]  V. Moyer,et al.  Screening for Cervical Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[25]  Kathy L. MacLaughlin,et al.  Formative evaluation of the accuracy of a clinical decision support system for cervical cancer screening , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[26]  Robert P Berkowitz,et al.  2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  D T Janerich,et al.  The screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer, Connecticut. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[28]  E. Franco,et al.  Counterpoint: cervical cancer screening guidelines--approaching the golden age. , 2013, American journal of epidemiology.

[29]  L. Rubenstein,et al.  Variations in Practice Guideline Adherence for Abnormal Cervical Cytology in a County Healthcare System , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[30]  J. Shaw,et al.  Impact of an encounter-based prompting system on resident vaccine administration performance and immunization knowledge. , 2000, Pediatrics.