Comparative analysis of E-Government Development Index: a case study of South Asian countries

Purpose This paper aims to check the E-Government Development Index (EGDI) of South Asian countries and then highlight the main challenges they are facing right now, which are causing South Asian countries to do good in the e-government sector. Design/methodology/approach The authors will be getting the EGDI data for South Asian countries through the United Nations website, and to visualize it for understanding, the authors will be taking the help of an Online Business intelligence tool. After successfully fetching data and presenting it in a proper format, the authors will be doing an analysis of the South Asian country’s EGDI score overall and also will check on individual indicator levels of EGDI. Findings Finally, the authors will be sharing the common improvement points which South Asian countries’ governments need to focus on to make their EGDI score better and get included in the list of top E-Government. With its help, countries will progress and get hand-in-hand with the world by providing the best governance practices to their citizens. Originality/value It is important to understand for South Asian countries that the e-government initiative is not just about transforming governance or providing quality services to citizens but also it is about being in sync with the world and competing with other countries in the development progress. So, they have to follow the e-government trends to get their country aligned with the world and attain progress country in a faster speed.

[1]  Aferdita Qekaj-Thaçi,et al.  The Quality of E-Government Management, Information Security and Quality , 2022, Emerging Science Journal.

[2]  Yolanda Ramírez,et al.  E-government mechanisms to enhance the participation of citizens and society: Exploratory analysis through the dimension of municipalities , 2022, Technology in Society.

[3]  Thi Mai Trang Nguyen,et al.  Promoting Information and Communication Technology in Online Service Delivery in Vietnam , 2021, Inżynieria Mineralna.

[4]  Yury Kabanov,et al.  Refining the UN E-participation Index: Introducing the deliberative assessment using the Varieties of Democracy data , 2021, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  Vincenzo Aquaro,et al.  Reframing E-participation for Sustainable Development , 2021, ICEGOV.

[6]  Saqib Ali,et al.  E-Participation Within E-Government: A Bibliometric-Based Systematic Literature Review , 2021, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[7]  H. Patrinos,et al.  Measuring human capital using global learning data , 2021, Nature.

[8]  V. Orekhov,et al.  Scientific Analysis of the Happiness Index in Regard to the Human Capital Development , 2020 .

[9]  Rajan Gupta,et al.  Regional E-governance Development Index for Developing Nations , 2020, Digit. Gov. Res. Pract..

[10]  Liu Ximei,et al.  A review of policies concerning development of big data industry in Pakistan: Subtitle: Development of big data industry in Pakistan , 2018, 2018 International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET).

[11]  Saibal K. Pal,et al.  The Need of a Development Assessment Index for e-Governance in India , 2017, ICEGOV.

[12]  Sujeet Kumar Sharma,et al.  Adoption of e-government services: The role of service quality dimensions and demographic variables , 2015 .

[13]  Bandaxay Lovanxay,et al.  ICT as one of the critical success factors of aging society in ASEAN: role and cooperation of Japan , 2014, ICEGOV.

[14]  Barney Warf,et al.  Asian geographies of e-government , 2014 .

[15]  M. Oivo,et al.  Factors affecting e‐government adoption in Pakistan: a citizen's perspective , 2013 .

[16]  Robert Goodwin,et al.  E-Government Readiness Assessment for Government Organizations in Developing Countries , 2011, Comput. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Hakikur Rahman,et al.  e-governance at the grass roots: SAARC context , 2010, ICEGOV '10.

[18]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  Citizen Participation and Involvement in eGovernment Projects: An Emergent Framework , 2008, EGOV.

[19]  Ook Lee,et al.  Overcoming the Confucian Psychological Barrier in Government Cyberspace , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  T. V. Prasad,et al.  E-governance and standardization , 2003, TENCON 2003. Conference on Convergent Technologies for Asia-Pacific Region.

[21]  A. Kanaan,et al.  The effect of quality, security and privacy factors on trust and intention to use e-government services , 2023, International Journal of Data and Network Science.

[22]  T. Janowski,et al.  Is Digitalization Improving Governance Quality? Correlating Analog and Digital Benchmarks , 2018 .

[23]  N. Siddiquee e-Government in Bangladesh: The Dawn of Citizen-Centric Public Administration? , 2017 .

[24]  Evan M. Berman,et al.  Public Administration in East Asia , 2010 .