Deal or No Deal? Evaluating Big Deals and Their Journals

This paper presents methods to develop metrics that compare Big Deal journal packages and the journals within those packages. Deal-level metrics guide selection of a Big Deal for termination. Journal-level metrics guide selection of individual subscriptions from journals previously provided by a terminated deal. The paper argues that, while the proposed metrics provide helpful quantitative data for comparative analysis, selection of individual subscriptions must also involve informed judgment about a library’s subject coverage needs and alternative sources of access. The paper also discusses how replacing a Big Deal with a reduced number of individual subscriptions may affect the collections budget, use of other resources, and interlibrary loan.

[1]  Harold Borko,et al.  Encyclopedia of library and information science , 1970 .

[2]  Anita Coleman,et al.  An Orderly Retreat from the Big Deal: Is It Possible for Consortia? , 2004, D Lib Mag..

[3]  Charlene Kellsey,et al.  Citation Analysis for Collection Development: A Comparative Study of Eight Humanities Fields1 , 2005, The Library Quarterly.

[4]  Judy Luther.  White Paper on Electronic Journal Usage Statistics , 2002 .

[5]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles? , 2006, Scientometrics.

[6]  D. Blecic.  Measurements of journal use: an analysis of the correlations between three methods. , 1999, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[7]  David C. Fowler.  The Bundling and Unbundling of E-Serials: Introduction , 2009 .

[8]  D. Hicks.  The Four Literatures of Social Science , 2004 .

[9]  T. Peters.  What’s the big deal? , 2001 .

[10]  S. A. Knight.  Methods of measurement , 1988 .

[11]  Judith L Wulff,et al.  Quality markers and use of electronic journals in an academic health sciences library. , 2004, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[12]  Robin N Sinn.  A Local Citation Analysis of Mathematical and Statistical Dissertations , 2005 .

[13]  Gosse.  Methods of Measurement , 1963, Blood pressure monitoring.

[14]  Michele R. Tennant,et al.  Using Comparative Online Journal Usage Studies to Assess the Big Deal , 2008 .

[15]  Norm Medeiros.  Uses of Necessity or Uses of Convenience? What Usage Statistics Reveal and Conceal About Electronic Serials , 2007 .

[16]  Richard L. Trueswell.  Some Behavioral Patterns of Library Users: The 80/20 Rule. , 1969 .

[17]  Brinley Franklin.  Managing the Electronic Collection with Cost per Use Data , 2005 .

[18]  Tom Sanville,et al.  An Orderly Retreat from the Big Deal: Is it Possible for Consortia? , 2004 .

[19]  Kenneth Frazier,et al.  The Librarians' Dilemma: Contemplating the Costs of the "Big Deal" , 2001, D Lib Mag..

[20]  E. Garfield.  Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.

[21]  Tom Peters.  What’s the use? The value of e‐resource usage statistics , 2002 .

[22]  J. Hurd,et al.  Information Use by Molecular Biologists: Implications for Library Collections and Services , 1999 .