Cross-study learning for generalist and specialist predictions

Jointly using data from multiple similar sources for the training of prediction models is increasingly becoming an important task in many fields of science. In this paper, we propose a framework for generalist and specialist predictions that leverages multiple datasets, with potential heterogenity in the relationships between predictors and outcomes. Our framework uses ensembling with stacking, and includes three major components: 1) training of the ensemble members using one or more datasets, 2) a no-data-reuse technique for stacking weights estimation and 3) task-specific utility functions. We prove that under certain regularity conditions, our framework produces a stacked prediction function with oracle property. We also provide analytically the conditions under which the proposed no-data-reuse technique will increase the prediction accuracy of the stacked prediction function compared to using the full data. We perform a simulation study to numerically verify and illustrate these results and apply our framework to predicting mortality based on a collection of variables including long-term exposure to common air pollutants.

[1]  G. Tseng,et al.  Comprehensive literature review and statistical considerations for microarray meta-analysis , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Data from Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project , 2022 .

[3]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Stacked regressions , 2004, Machine Learning.

[4]  C. Huttenhower,et al.  Assessment of variation in microbial community amplicon sequencing by the Microbiome Quality Control (MBQC) project consortium , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Pitfalls in the use of DNA microarray data for diagnostic and prognostic classification. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  David J Spiegelhalter,et al.  A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis , 2009, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A,.

[7]  G. Tseng,et al.  Comprehensive literature review and statistical considerations for GWAS meta-analysis , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  John Hardy,et al.  Genome, transcriptome and proteome: the rise of omics data and their integration in biomedical sciences , 2016, Briefings Bioinform..

[9]  P. Brown,et al.  Large-scale meta-analysis of cancer microarray data identifies common transcriptional profiles of neoplastic transformation and progression. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Edoardo Pasolli,et al.  Machine Learning Meta-analysis of Large Metagenomic Datasets: Tools and Biological Insights , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  Prasad Patil,et al.  Test set bias affects reproducibility of gene signatures , 2015, Bioinform..

[12]  Robert H. Shumway,et al.  Time series analysis and its applications : with R examples , 2017 .

[13]  Lawrence Joseph,et al.  A hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials of drug-eluting stents , 2004, The Lancet.

[14]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Combining Estimates in Regression and Classification , 1996 .

[15]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A unifying view on dataset shift in classification , 2012, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  Prasad Patil,et al.  Hierachical Resampling for Bagging in Multi-Study Prediction with Applications to Human Neurochemical Sensing , 2019, bioRxiv.

[17]  Prasad Patil,et al.  Training replicable predictors in multiple studies , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  A. Juditsky,et al.  Learning by mirror averaging , 2005, math/0511468.

[19]  Aedín C. Culhane,et al.  Public data and open source tools for multi-assay genomic investigation of disease , 2015, Briefings Bioinform..

[20]  A. Juditsky,et al.  Functional aggregation for nonparametric regression , 2000 .

[21]  Julian P T Higgins,et al.  Recent developments in meta‐analysis , 2008, Statistics in medicine.