Patient and hospital characteristics associated with traditional measures of inpatient quality of care for patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine patient and hospital characteristics associated with 4 measures of quality of inpatient heart failure care used by both the primary payer of heart failure care in the United States (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) and the main hospital accrediting organization (The Joint Commission). METHODS We used data from Get With The Guidelines Program for patients hospitalized with heart failure. Eligibility for receiving care based on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services performance measures was determined for assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; n = 60,601), use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) if LVEF<40% and no contraindications (24,130), discharge instructions (49,383), and smoking cessation counseling (10,152). Patient and hospital characteristics that were significantly associated with performance measures in univariate analyses were entered into multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS Overall, documentation for LVEF assessment was noted in 95%, ACEi/ARB use in 87%, discharge instruction in 82%, and smoking cessation counseling in 91% of eligible patients. In adjusted analyses, older patients and those with evidence of renal failure were significantly less likely to receive each care measure except for discharge instructions (no age effect). Patients with higher body mass index were more likely to receive ACEi/ARB and discharge instructions but less likely to have LVEF documented or to receive smoking cessation counseling. Small hospitals (<200 beds) were less likely to provide each of the performance measures compared with larger hospitals. CONCLUSION Recommended heart failure care is less likely in patients with certain characteristics (older age and abnormal renal function) and those cared for in smaller hospitals. Programs to improve evidence-based care for heart failure should consider interventions specifically targeting and tailored to smaller facilities and patients who are older with comorbidities.

[1]  L. Schwamm,et al.  Hospital performance recognition with the Get With The Guidelines Program and mortality for acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. , 2009, American heart journal.

[2]  Joseph Thomas,et al.  Health Insurance Coverage and Health-Related Quality of Life: Analysis of 2000 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Data , 2005, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[3]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  JCAHO accreditation and quality of care for acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, Health affairs.

[4]  R. Gliklich,et al.  Using "get with the guidelines" to improve cardiovascular secondary prevention. , 2003, Joint Commission journal on quality and safety.

[5]  M. Mcclellan,et al.  Association of Renal Insufficiency with Treatment and Outcomes after Myocardial Infarction in Elderly Patients , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  K. Labresh,et al.  Get with the guidelines. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[7]  J. Weissman,et al.  Teaching hospitals and quality of care: a review of the literature. , 2002, The Milbank quarterly.

[8]  G. Fonarow,et al.  Age- and gender-related differences in quality of care and outcomes of patients hospitalized with heart failure (from OPTIMIZE-HF). , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Provider and Hospital Characteristics Associated With Geographic Variation in the Evaluation and Management of Elderly Patients With Heart Failure , 2004 .

[10]  C. Patterson,et al.  Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. , 1995 .

[11]  Nancy M Albert,et al.  Association between performance measures and clinical outcomes for patients hospitalized with heart failure. , 2007, JAMA.

[12]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Regional variation in the treatment and outcomes of myocardial infarction: investigating New England's advantage. , 2003, American heart journal.

[13]  A. Jha,et al.  Care in U.S. hospitals--the Hospital Quality Alliance program. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Jun Ma,et al.  Adult Obesity and Office‐based Quality of Care in the United States , 2009, Obesity.

[15]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Relationship between Medicare's hospital compare performance measures and mortality rates. , 2006, JAMA.

[16]  R. Centor,et al.  Relationship of hospital teaching status with quality of care and mortality for Medicare patients with acute MI. , 2000, JAMA.

[17]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  ACC/AHA Clinical Performance Measures for Adults with Chronic Heart Failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Heart Failure Clinical Performance Measures): endorsed by the Heart Failure Society , 2005, Circulation.

[18]  Lynn A Smaha,et al.  The American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines program. , 2004, American heart journal.