Morphological Box Classification Framework for supporting 3D scanner selection

ABSTRACT 3-Dimensional (3D) scanning systems are becoming more common in the industry nowadays, for inspection and reverse engineering (RE) purposes. Although technical specifications are provided with commercially available scanners, a question could be raised pertaining to the degree of sufficiency of the technical specifications typically provided, with regard to specific application needs such as the scanning of challenging objects. These challenging objects present a less than ideal working condition for some 3D scanners, and the specified accuracy cannot be achieved. This effect varies across different types of 3D scanning technology. A more intuitive specification with regard to the time taken and ease of use will be beneficial to the user, but often not available. Hence, this paper proposes a Morphological Box Classification Framework based on the functional decomposition of the non-contact 3D scanning technology, in order to help users better understand and compare 3D scanners efficiently, and choose a scanner for their application that is able to perform within their desired accuracy, time taken, and ease of use. A case study of 3D scanners evaluation using the proposed framework for a RE application is conducted, and results presented.

[1]  Qiang Zhou,et al.  Dip transform for 3D shape reconstruction , 2017, ACM Trans. Graph..

[2]  Saeid Motavalli,et al.  A part image reconstruction system for reverse engineering of design modifications , 1991 .

[3]  K. Suresh,et al.  Topology optimization under thermo-elastic buckling , 2017, ArXiv.

[4]  Steven Paquette,et al.  3D scanning in apparel design and human engineering , 1996, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[5]  Luigi Maria Galantucci,et al.  A 12-camera body scanning system based on close-range photogrammetry for precise applications , 2016 .

[6]  Manuel Guizar-Sicairos,et al.  3D scanning SAXS: a novel method for the assessment of bone ultrastructure orientation. , 2015, Bone.

[7]  K. Suresh,et al.  Multi-constrained 3D topology optimization via augmented topological level-set , 2016, ArXiv.

[8]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  The use of 3D scanning for sporting applications , 2015, Commercial + Scientific Sensing and Imaging.

[9]  Enrico Vezzetti,et al.  Development of an innovative low-cost MARG sensors alignment and distortion compensation methodology for 3D scanning applications , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[10]  Krishnan Suresh,et al.  Stress constrained thermo-elastic topology optimization with varying temperature fields via augmented topological sensitivity based level-set , 2017, ArXiv.

[11]  Paulo Jorge Da Silva bartolo,et al.  Estimation of biometric parameters from cattle rump using free-hand scanning and a 3D data processing algorithm , 2016 .