Treatment of uncertainties in space nuclear risk assessment with examples from Cassini mission applications

Abstract By means of several examples from a recent comprehensive space nuclear risk analysis of the Cassini mission, a scenario and consequence representational framework is presented for risk analysis of space nuclear power systems in the context of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties. The framework invites the use of probabilistic models for the calculation of both event probabilities and scenario consequences. Each scenario is associated with a frequency that may include both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. The outcome of each scenario is described in terms of an end state vector. The outcome of each scenario is also characterized by a source term. In this paper, the source term factors of interest are number of failed clads in the space nuclear power system, amount of fuel released and amount of fuel that is potentially respirable. These are also subject to uncertainties. The 1990 work of Apostolakis is found to be a useful formalism from which to derive the relevant probabilistic models. However, an extension to the formalism was necessary to accommodate the situation in which aleatory uncertainty is represented by changes in the form of the probability function itself, not just its parameters. Event trees that show reasonable alternative accident scenarios are presented. A grouping of probabilities and consequences is proposed as a useful structure for thinking about uncertainties. An example of each category is provided. Concluding observations are made about the judgments involved in this analysis of uncertainties and the effect of distinguishing between aleatory and epistemic uncertainties.

[1]  F. O. Hoffman,et al.  Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: the need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Probability, conditional probability and complementary cumulative distribution functions in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal , 1996 .

[3]  G. Apostolakis.  The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. , 1990, Science.

[4]  Michael V. Frank.  Uncertainty analysis for Ulysses safety evaluation report , 1991 .

[5]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment , 1996 .

[6]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  Uncertainty in probabilistic risk assessment , 1996 .

[7]  Eduard Hofer,et al.  When to separate uncertainties and when not to separate , 1996 .

[8]  Thomas E. McKone,et al.  Alternative modeling approaches for contaminant fate in soils: uncertainty, variability, and reliability , 1996 .

[9]  Gareth W. Parry,et al.  The characterization of uncertainty in probabilistic risk assessments of complex systems , 1996 .

[10]  Ronald A. Howard.  Uncertainty about Probability: A Decision Analysis Perspective , 1988 .

[11]  G. Apostolakis,et al.  Special committee review of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's severe accident risks report (NUREG--1150) , 1990 .

[12]  David E. Burmaster,et al.  Assessment of Variability and Uncertainty Distributions for Practical Risk Analyses , 1994 .

[13]  Stephen C. Hora,et al.  Aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in probability elicitation with an example from hazardous waste management , 1996 .

[14]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Two methods for the structured assessment of model uncertainty by experts in performance assessments of radioactive waste repositories , 1996 .

[15]  M. K. Ravindra,et al.  Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies , 1984 .