Evidence from the study of urban transit systems in two maritime cities suggests that certain aspects of this municipal service are inequitably distributed. A linear regression analysis of several equity‐measuring variables and transit services indicators demonstrates inequities in service provision, particularly for “transit captives.” For example, although the needs of the elderly tend to be met in both systems, the same is not true for youthful patrons. Low income families also tend to be discriminated against through the use of flat fares regardless of the length and time of the trip. Equity aspects in urban transit must be considered along with the system's efficiency.
[1]
Martin Wachs,et al.
EFFICIENCY AND EQUITY IMPLICATIONS OF ALTERNATIVE TRANSIT FARE POLICIES
,
1980
.
[2]
Wayne R Ugolik,et al.
WHO PAYS THE HIGHEST AND THE LOWEST PER-KILOMETER TRANSIT FARES (ABRIDGMENT)
,
1979
.
[3]
John Pucher,et al.
Equity in Transit Finance: Distribution of Transit Subsidy Benefits and Costs Among Income Classes
,
1981
.
[4]
B. Blishen,et al.
Arevised socioeconomic index for occupation in Canada
,
1976
.
[5]
D. Sundararajan,et al.
Municipal Service Distribution: Equity Concerns
,
1984
.