Fine Particle Receptor Modeling in the Atmosphere of Mexico City

Abstract Source apportionment analyses were carried out by means of receptor modeling techniques to determine the contribution of major fine particulate matter (PM2.5) sources found at six sites in Mexico City. Thirty-six source profiles were determined within Mexico City to establish the fingerprints of particulate matter sources. Additionally, the profiles under the same source category were averaged using cluster analysis and the fingerprints of 10 sources were included. Before application of the chemical mass balance (CMB), several tests were carried out to determine the best combination of source profiles and species used for the fitting. CMB results showed significant spatial variations in source contributions among the six sites that are influenced by local soil types and land use. On average, 24-hr PM2.5 concentrations were dominated by mobile source emissions (45%), followed by secondary inorganic aerosols (16%) and geological material (17%). Industrial emissions representing oil combustion and incineration contributed less than 5%, and their contribution was higher at the industrial areas of Tlalnepantla (11%) and Xalostoc (8%). Other sources such as cooking, biomass burning, and oil fuel combustion were identified at lower levels. A second receptor model (principal component analysis, [PCA]) was subsequently applied to three of the monitoring sites for comparison purposes. Although differences were obtained between source contributions, results evidence the advantages of the combined use of different receptor modeling techniques for source apportionment, given the complementary nature of their results. Further research is needed in this direction to reach a better agreement between the estimated source contributions to the particulate matter mass.

[1]  A. D'Alessandro,et al.  Characterization of particulate matter sources in an urban environment. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Nares Chuersuwan,et al.  Levels and major sources of PM2.5 and PM10 in Bangkok Metropolitan Region. , 2008, Environment international.

[3]  Nigel N Clark,et al.  Development of molecular marker source profiles for emissions from on-road gasoline and diesel vehicle fleets. , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[4]  A. Gertler,et al.  Motor Vehicle Contributions to Ambient PM10 and PM2.5 at Selected Urban Areas in the USA , 2007, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[5]  D. Lowenthal,et al.  Sources of PM10 and PM2.5 in Cairo’s ambient air , 2007, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[6]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Evaluation of organic markers for chemical mass balance source apportionment at the Fresno Supersite , 2006 .

[7]  J. Schauer,et al.  Seasonal trends in PM2.5 source contributions in Beijing, China , 2005 .

[8]  Hampden Kuhns,et al.  Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[9]  Judith C Chow,et al.  Chemical composition of PM2.5 and PM10 in Mexico City during winter 1997. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  J. Chow,et al.  Chemical composition of fugitive dust emitters in Mexico City , 2001 .

[11]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH Carbon Measurements , 2001 .

[12]  J. Schauer,et al.  Source Apportionment of Wintertime Gas-Phase and Particle-Phase Air Pollutants Using Organic Compounds as Tracers , 2000 .

[13]  John A. Gillies,et al.  An Assessment of the Mobile Source Contribution to PM10 and PM2.5 in the United States , 2000 .

[14]  V. Mugica,et al.  Hydrocarbon source apportionment in Mexico City using the chemical mass balance receptor model , 2000 .

[15]  J C Chow,et al.  Particulate Air Pollution in Mexico City: A Collaborative Research Project. , 1999, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[16]  Sheldon Landsberger,et al.  Elemental analysis of airborne particles , 1999 .

[17]  Ronald E. Hester,et al.  Receptor modeling for air quality management , 1997 .

[18]  Elizabeth Vega, Isidoro García,,et al.  Application of a Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model to Respirable Particulate Matter in Mexico City. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[19]  M. Ruíz,et al.  Application of a Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model to Respirable Particulate Matter in Mexico City. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[20]  J C Chow,et al.  Measurement methods to determine compliance with ambient air quality standards for suspended particles. , 1995, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[21]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  A laboratory resuspension chamber to measure fugitive dust size distributions and chemical compositions , 1994 .

[22]  J C Chow,et al.  Validation of the chemical mass balance receptor model applied to hydrocarbon source apportionment in the southern california air quality study. , 1994, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Chemical Mass Balance Source Apportionment of PM10 during the Southern California Air Quality Study , 1994 .

[24]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  The dri thermal/optical reflectance carbon analysis system: description, evaluation and applications in U.S. Air quality studies , 1993 .

[25]  E. Ziegel Principles of environmental sampling , 1990 .

[26]  P. Scheff,et al.  Source‐Receptor Analysis of Volatile Hydrocarbons , 1987 .

[27]  P. Hopke Receptor modeling in environmental chemistry , 1985 .

[28]  John D. Spengler,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF SOURCE CONTRIBUTIONS TO INHALABLE PARTICULATE MATTER POLLUTION IN METROPOLITAN BOSTON , 1985 .

[29]  Development and validation of a chemical element mass balance for Chicago , 1984 .

[30]  John G. Watson,et al.  Overview of Receptor Model Principles , 1984 .

[31]  Paul J. Lioy,et al.  Air Sampling Instruments for Evaluation of Atmospheric Contaminants , 1983 .

[32]  J. Cooper,et al.  Receptor Oriented Methods of Air Particulate Source Apportionment , 1980 .

[33]  Grinding Facility,et al.  Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards , 1976 .

[34]  John A. Maga,et al.  AIR SAMPLING INSTRUMENTS FOR EVALUATION OF ATMOSPHERIC CONTAMINANTS , 1961 .