De-emphasizing Content to Study the Relationship between Meaning, Messages, and Content in IM Systems

The design of most instant messaging (IM) tools focuses on exchanging content as the meaning and process of communication, a convention that equates content with meaning in a way counter to modern theories of interpersonal communication. We critique these conventions in designing a mobile messaging application, BubbleQ, which de-emphasizes message content and defamiliarizes interaction flows by forbidding users to send content directly. Instead, users send empty "bubbles", blank messages that recipients can fill and return to the sender. Messages are also presented not as per-user threads, but as an aggregation of bubbles across all conversational partners; they are also given a physical form to interact with to further violate common IM design conventions. Interviews with 28 college students who used BubbleQ for two weeks show that these design twists made room for negotiating other meanings, supported playful, mundane interaction, and provided resources for deepening relationships. Further, the aggregate bubbles view led people to reflect holistically on interactions. Together, these findings suggest that IM designers should spend more time addressing the meanings, embodiments, embedding, and cost of messages.

[1]  Joseph Kaye,et al.  Communicating intimacy one bit at a time , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[2]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[3]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Mailing Archived Emails as Postcards: Probing the Value of Virtual Collections , 2016, CHI.

[4]  Steven W. Duck,et al.  Some Evident Truths About Conversations in Everyday Relationships All Communications Are Not Created Equal , 1991 .

[5]  Joseph B. Bayer,et al.  Sharing the small moments: ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat , 2016 .

[6]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  --Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration : Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work , 2001 .

[7]  Kathy Kellermann.  Communication: Inherently strategic and primarily automatic , 1992 .

[8]  B. Glaser.  The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis , 1965 .

[9]  M. S. Balaji,et al.  Student Interactions in Online Discussion Forum: Empirical Research from "Media Richness Theory" Perspective. , 2010 .

[10]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Chatting with teenagers: Considering the place of chat technologies in teen life , 2006, TCHI.

[11]  Mathilde Pignol,et al.  Kinetic typography-based instant messaging , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  B. Burleson.  The Nature of Interpersonal Communication: A Message-Centered Approach , 2010 .

[13]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  CrystalChat: Visualizing Personal Chat History , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[14]  Dan Cosley,et al.  pieTime: Visualizing Communication Patterns , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[15]  Allison Druin,et al.  Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families , 2003, CHI '03.

[16]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Social networks and Internet connectivity effects , 2005 .

[17]  Charles F. Hockett,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[18]  R. Cialdini.  Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion , 1993 .

[19]  Youn-Kyung Lim,et al.  iSpace: interactivity expression for self-expression in an online communication environment , 2012, DIS '12.

[20]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Butler lies: awareness, deception and design , 2009, CHI.

[21]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[22]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[23]  M. T. Motley.  On Whether One Can(not) Not Communicate: An Examination via Traditional Communication Postulates. , 1990 .

[24]  Judith S. Donath,et al.  Chat circles , 1999, CHI '99.

[25]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Andrew M. Ledbetter,et al.  Do online communication attitudes mitigate the association between Facebook use and relational interdependence? An extension of media multiplexity theory , 2014, New Media Soc..

[27]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[28]  Bin Xu,et al.  Automatic Archiving versus Default Deletion: What Snapchat Tells Us About Ephemerality in Design , 2016, CSCW.

[29]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Social presence with video and application sharing , 2001, GROUP.

[30]  Benjamin Bailey,et al.  Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. , 2004 .