CFD Validation and Flow Control of RAE-M2129 S-Duct Diffuser Using CREATETM-AV Kestrel Simulation Tools

The flow physics modeling and validation of the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE) subsonic intake Model 2129 (M2129) are presented. This intake has an 18 inches long S duct with a 5.4 inches offset, an external and an internal lip, forward and rear extended ducts, and a center-positioned bullet before the outlet. Steady-state and unsteady experimental data are available for this duct. The measurements include engine face conditions (pressure recovery, static pressure to free-stream total pressure ratio, and distortion coefficient at the worst 60 ∘ sector or DC60), as well as wall static pressure data along the duct. The intake has been modeled with HPCMP CREATE TM -AV Kestrel simulation tools. The validation results are presented including the effects of turbulence models on predictions. In general, very good agreement (difference errors are less than 6%) was found between predictions and measurements. Secondary flow at the first bend and a region of flow separation are predicted at the starboard wall with an averaged DC60 coefficient of 0.2945 at the engine face. Next, a passive and an active flow control method are computationally investigated. The passive one uses vane-type vortex generators and the active one has synthetic jet actuators. The results show that considered passive and active flow control methods reduce the distortion coefficient at the engine face and the worst 60 ∘ sector to 0.1361 and 0.0881, respectively. The flow control performance trends agree with those obtained in experiments as well. These results give confidence to apply the Kestrel simulation tools for the intake design studies of new and unconventional vehicles and hence to reduce the uncertainties during their flight testing.

[1]  F. Menter.  Eddy Viscosity Transport Equations and Their Relation to the k-ε Model , 1997 .

[2]  P. Spalart.  Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach , 1997 .

[3]  D. MacManus,et al.  Assessment methods for unsteady flow distortion in aero-engine intakes , 2018 .

[4]  B. H. Anderson,et al.  Vortex-generator installation studies on steady-state and dynamic distortion , 1996 .

[5]  Scott A. Morton,et al.  Kestrel -- A Fixed Wing Virtual Aircraft Product of the CREATE Program , 2009, 2009 DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program Users Group Conference.

[6]  B. A. Reichert,et al.  Improving curved subsonic diffuser performance with vortex generators , 1996 .

[7]  Jeffrey W. Hamstra,et al.  Active inlet flow control technology demonstration , 2000, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[8]  Scott Morton,et al.  Integrating CREATE-AV Products DaVinci and Kestrel: Experiences and Lessons Learned , 2012 .

[9]  David R. McDaniel,et al.  A Fixed-Wing Aircraft Simulation Tool for Improving DoD Acquisition Efficiency , 2016, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[10]  Scott A. Morton,et al.  Accuracy and Performance Improvements to Kestrel’s Near-Body Flow Solver , 2016 .

[11]  R. Menzies.  Computational Investigation of Flows in Diffusing S-shaped Intakes , 2001 .

[12]  Robert H. Nichols,et al.  Addition of Improved Shock-Capturing Schemes to OVERFLOW 2.1 , 2009 .

[13]  A. C. Brown,et al.  Subsonic diffusers designed integrally with vortex generators. , 1968 .

[14]  P. Spalart.  A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[15]  P. Spalart,et al.  On the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature , 1997 .

[16]  Markus Wallin,et al.  Effects of Engine Intake and Nozzle Design the Performance of a Low-Signature Reconnaissance UAV , 2004 .

[17]  Michael Amitay,et al.  Separation Control in Duct Flows , 2002 .

[18]  Adam Jirasek,et al.  Design of Vortex Generator Flow Control in Inlets , 2006 .