Diagnostic performance of texture analysis on MRI in grading cerebral gliomas.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Grading of cerebral gliomas is important both in treatment decision and assessment of prognosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of grading cerebral gliomas by assessing the tumor heterogeneity using MRI texture analysis (MRTA). MATERIAL AND METHODS 95 patients with gliomas were included, 27 low grade gliomas (LGG) all grade II and 68 high grade gliomas (HGG) (grade III=34 and grade IV=34). Preoperative MRI examinations were performed using a 3T scanner and MRTA was done on preoperative contrast-enhanced three-dimensional isotropic spoiled gradient echo images in a representative ROI. The MRTA was assessed using a commercially available research software program (TexRAD) that applies a filtration-histogram technique for characterizing tumor heterogeneity. Filtration step selectively filters and extracts texture features at different anatomical scales varying from 2mm (fine features) to 6mm (coarse features), the statistical parameter standard deviation (SD) was obtained. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) was performed to assess sensitivity and specificity for differentiating between the different grades and calculating a threshold value to quantify the heterogeneity. RESULTS LGG and HGG was best discriminated using SD at fine texture scale, with a sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 81% (AUC 0.910, p<0.0001). The diagnostic ability for MRTA to differentiate between the different sub-groups (grade II-IV) was slightly lower but still significant. CONCLUSIONS Measuring heterogeneity in gliomas to discriminate HGG from LGG and between different histological sub-types on already obtained images using MRTA can be a useful tool to augment the diagnostic accuracy in grading cerebral gliomas and potentially hasten treatment decision.

[1]  Margarida Julià-Sapé,et al.  Brain tumor classification by proton MR spectroscopy: comparison of diagnostic accuracy at short and long TE. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  B. O'neill,et al.  Glioblastoma survival in the United States before and during the temozolomide era , 2012, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[3]  Pieter Wesseling,et al.  International Society of Neuropathology‐Haarlem Consensus Guidelines for Nervous System Tumor Classification and Grading , 2014, Brain pathology.

[4]  C. Chatwin,et al.  Hepatic entropy and uniformity: additional parameters that can potentially increase the effectiveness of contrast enhancement during abdominal CT. , 2007, Clinical radiology.

[5]  G Johnson,et al.  Comparing perfusion metrics obtained from a single compartment versus pharmacokinetic modeling methods using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[6]  Alessandro Olivi,et al.  Independent predictors of morbidity after image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy: a risk assessment of 270 cases. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  A. Bjørnerud,et al.  Glioma grading by using histogram analysis of blood volume heterogeneity from MR-derived cerebral blood volume maps. , 2008, Radiology.

[8]  Sang Joon Park,et al.  Glioma: Application of Whole-Tumor Texture Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Evaluation of Tumor Heterogeneity , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  M. P. Hayball,et al.  CT texture analysis using the filtration-histogram method: what do the measurements mean? , 2013, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[10]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging of Cerebral Gliomas: Evaluating Fractional Anisotropy Characteristics , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[11]  A. Server,et al.  Measurements of diagnostic examination performance and correlation analysis using microvascular leakage, cerebral blood volume, and blood flow derived from 3T dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging in glial tumor grading , 2011, Neuroradiology.

[12]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Assessment of tumor heterogeneity by CT texture analysis: can the largest cross-sectional area be used as an alternative to whole tumor analysis? , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[13]  M. Kitajima,et al.  Cerebral gliomas: prospective comparison of multivoxel 2D chemical-shift imaging proton MR spectroscopy, echoplanar perfusion and diffusion-weighted MRI , 2002, Neuroradiology.

[14]  Bal Sanghera,et al.  Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice? , 2012, Insights into Imaging.

[15]  G Johnson,et al.  Comparison of microvascular permeability measurements, K(trans), determined with conventional steady-state T1-weighted and first-pass T2*-weighted MR imaging methods in gliomas and meningiomas. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  Z L Gokaslan,et al.  Limitations of stereotactic biopsy in the initial management of gliomas. , 2001, Neuro-oncology.

[17]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[18]  C. McPherson,et al.  Critical role of imaging in the neurosurgical and radiotherapeutic management of brain tumors. , 2014, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[19]  Michael E Griswold,et al.  Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: CT texture and histogram analysis allow independent prediction of overall survival in patients treated with induction chemotherapy. , 2013, Radiology.

[20]  C. Good,et al.  Measurements of heterogeneity in gliomas on computed tomography relationship to tumour grade , 2012, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[21]  R. Stupp,et al.  The Role of Radio- and Chemotherapy in Glioblastoma , 2005, Oncology Research and Treatment.

[22]  A. Lagares,et al.  The Added Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Cerebral Blood Volume in the Preoperative Grading of Diffuse Gliomas , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[23]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging Using a Phase-Derived Vascular Input Function in the Preoperative Grading of Gliomas , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[24]  Alessandro Olivi,et al.  Frameless image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy procedure: diagnostic yield, surgical morbidity, and comparison with the frame-based technique. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery.

[25]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  D. Scheie,et al.  Overall survival, prognostic factors, and repeated surgery in a consecutive series of 516 patients with glioblastoma multiforme , 2010, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[27]  R. Arceci Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing , 2012 .

[28]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system , 2007, Acta Neuropathologica.

[29]  A. Server,et al.  Analysis of diffusion tensor imaging metrics for gliomas grading at 3 T. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[30]  Tarik Tihan,et al.  Brain tumor epidemiology: Consensus from the Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium , 2008, Cancer.

[31]  D. Straus,et al.  Surgical management of low-grade gliomas. , 2014, Seminars in oncology.