Procurement Issues in Malaysia

Purpose- This study was undertaken with the aim of surveying the perception of the two main stakeholders in procurement system; the contractors and the procurement officers on issues such as accountability, transparency, corruption, integrity and cronyism pertaining to the public procurement system in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach- Interviews were conducted over a nine-month period in 2007 to gauge the perception of the procurement officers and contractors on procurement issues in Malaysia. The interview data were then transcribed and grouped according to six main themes; transparency, procurement policies and procedures and its implementation, personnel involved in the procurement system, estimation/budget/pricing, professionalism and ethics and timeliness. Findings- One of the common complaints made by the contractors was prevalence of interference from outside parties and cronyism, which affects the awarding of contracts. The procurement officers were blamed for malpractice and non compliance to the policies and procedures of the procurement system. Practical implications- The paper deals with sensitive issues and takes several months to successfully gather respondents who willing to give feedback on their experience with the procurement system. The data are first hand information and are carefully transcribed and categorized into categories to help better understanding of the issues raised by the respondents. Originality/value- The paper deals with sensitive issues and takes several months to successfully gather respondents who willing to give feedback on their experience with the procurement system. The data are first hand information and are carefully transcribed and categorized into categories to help better understanding of the issues raised by the respondents and the private sector.

[1]  C. K. Lindblom.  The implications of Organizational Legitimacy for Corporate Social Performance and Disclosure , 1994 .

[2]  Jan Bebbington,et al.  Legitimating reputation/the reputation of legitimacy theory , 2008 .

[3]  Geoffrey Frost,et al.  Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory , 2000 .

[4]  G. Garson,et al.  The promise of digital government , 2004 .

[5]  E. Elijido-Ten.  Applying stakeholder theory to analyze corporate environmental performance: Evidence from Australian listed companies , 2007 .

[6]  Carol A. Adams.  A commentary on: corporate social responsibility reporting and reputation risk management , 2008 .

[7]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[8]  C. Deegan,et al.  An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983‐1997: A test of legitimacy theory , 2002 .

[9]  C. Deegan.  Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation , 2002 .

[10]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  A web-based architecture for implementing electronic procurement in military organisations , 2003 .

[11]  B. Morton,et al.  Going! Going! ...... , 2008, Marine pollution bulletin.

[12]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  E-Procurement Adoption in the Danish Public Sector: The Influence of Economic and Political Rationality , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Alistair Brandon-Jones,et al.  Key issues in e-procurement: Procurement implementation and operation in the public sector , 2005 .

[14]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  An Approach to Incorporating Societal Preferences in Developing Corporate Action Strategies , 1973 .

[15]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[16]  L. Parker.  Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box , 2005 .

[17]  Janet Luft Mobus.  Mandatory environmental disclosures in a legitimacy theory context , 2005 .

[18]  B. Tuckman.  Conducting Educational Research , 1972 .

[19]  C. Deegan,et al.  An Analysis of Incentives for Australian Firms to Apply for Reporting Excellence Awards , 1993 .

[20]  E. Beth.  Integrity in Public Procurement: Good Practice from A to Z , 2007 .

[21]  C. Jung,et al.  The Red Book , 2009 .

[22]  B. Hoekman,et al.  Government Procurement : Market Access , Transparency , and Multilateral Trade Rules * , 2002 .

[23]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .