A System for Neuromotor Based Rehabilitation on a Passive Robotic Aid

In the aging world population, the occurrence of neuromotor deficits arising from stroke and other medical conditions is expected to grow, demanding the design of new and more effective approaches to rehabilitation. In this paper, we show how the combination of robotic technologies with progress in exergaming methodologies may lead to the creation of new rehabilitation protocols favoring motor re-learning. To this end, we introduce the Track-Hold system for neuromotor rehabilitation based on a passive robotic arm and integrated software. A special configuration of weights on the robotic arm fully balances the weight of the patients’ arm, allowing them to perform a purely neurological task, overcoming the muscular effort of similar free-hand exercises. A set of adaptive and configurable exercises are proposed to patients through a large display and a graphical user interface. Common everyday tasks are also proposed for patients to learn again the associated actions in a persistent way, thus improving life independence. A data analysis module was also designed to monitor progress and compute indices of post-stroke neurological damage and Parkinsonian-type disorders. The system was tested in the lab and in a pilot project involving five patients in the post-stroke chronic stage with partial paralysis of the right upper limb, showing encouraging preliminary results.

[1]  Luigi Gallo,et al.  SmartCARE - An ICT Platform in the Domain of Stroke Pathology to Manage Rehabilitation Treatment and Telemonitoring at Home , 2016, IIMSS.

[2]  Jennifer A. Semrau,et al.  Robot enhanced stroke therapy optimizes rehabilitation (RESTORE): a pilot study , 2021, Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation.

[3]  I. Cikajlo,et al.  Exergaming as Part of the Telerehabilitation Can Be Adequate to the Outpatient Training: Preliminary Findings of a Non-randomized Pilot Study in Parkinson's Disease , 2021, Frontiers in Neurology.

[4]  N. Hogan,et al.  The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[5]  Jaap H. Buurke,et al.  The Effectiveness of the Bobath Concept in Stroke Rehabilitation: What is the Evidence? , 2009, Stroke.

[6]  Dimitrios I. Fotiadis,et al.  Assessment of Tremor Activity in the Parkinson’s Disease Using a Set of Wearable Sensors , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[7]  R. Gassert,et al.  Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke , 2020, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  K. Okumura,et al.  Dabigatran for Japanese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Prior Stroke: A Subgroup Analysis of the J-Dabigatran Surveillance Program. , 2020, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[9]  Filippo Cavallo,et al.  A Wearable System to Objectify Assessment of Motor Tasks for Supporting Parkinson’s Disease Diagnosis , 2020, Sensors.

[10]  H. Kabat,et al.  Spasticity; its nature and treatment. , 1954, California medicine.

[11]  Filippo Palumbo,et al.  Experimenting Mobile and e-Health Services with Frail MCI Older People , 2019, Inf..

[12]  T. Paillard Cross-Education Related to the Ipsilateral Limb Activity on Monopedal Postural Control of the Contralateral Limb: A Review , 2020, Frontiers in Physiology.

[13]  S. Kuroda,et al.  Impact of cortical hemodynamic failure on both subsequent hemorrhagic stroke and effect of bypass surgery in hemorrhagic moyamoya disease: a supplementary analysis of the Japan Adult Moyamoya Trial. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  Ji-Yeong Lee,et al.  Comparisons between end-effector and exoskeleton rehabilitation robots regarding upper extremity function among chronic stroke patients with moderate-to-severe upper limb impairment , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Pamela W Duncan,et al.  Promoting neuroplasticity and recovery after stroke: future directions for rehabilitation clinical trials. , 2013, Current opinion in neurology.

[16]  Ivan Miguel Pires,et al.  A Case Study on the Development of a Data Privacy Management Solution Based on Patient Information , 2020, Sensors.

[17]  M. Inzitari,et al.  Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Study Cerebral Hemodynamics in Older Adults During Cognitive and Motor Tasks: A Review , 2020, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.

[18]  N. Hogan,et al.  Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  N. Hogan,et al.  Comparison of Two Techniques of Robot-Aided Upper Limb Exercise Training After Stroke , 2004, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[20]  X. de Boissezon,et al.  Responsiveness of kinematic and clinical measures of upper-limb motor function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2020, Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[21]  T. B. F. Pacheco,et al.  Effectiveness of exergames for improving mobility and balance in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, Systematic Reviews.

[22]  P. Archambault,et al.  Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of a Virtual Reality Exergame System to Supplement Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Post-Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial and Proof of Principle , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[23]  Cordula Werner,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of Cognitive Sensory Motor Training Therapy on the recovery of arm function in acute stroke patients , 2012, Clinical rehabilitation.

[24]  G De Petris,et al.  Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller , 2018, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[25]  W. Z. Wan Hasan,et al.  A Review on Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robots , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[26]  L. Stone,et al.  Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror , 1999, The Lancet.

[27]  Maureen K. Holden,et al.  Virtual Environments for Motor Rehabilitation: Review , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[28]  L. Thijs,et al.  Effectiveness of somatosensory interventions on somatosensory, motor and functional outcomes in the upper limb post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, NeuroRehabilitation.

[29]  A. Guekht,et al.  Effect of tDCS on Fine Motor Control of Patients in Subacute and Chronic Post-Stroke Stages , 2019, Journal of motor behavior.

[30]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke , 2013, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[31]  Li Jin,et al.  Stroke burden and mortality attributable to ambient fine particulate matter pollution in 195 countries and territories and trend analysis from 1990 to 2017. , 2020, Environmental research.

[32]  Luis Enrique Sucar,et al.  Robot training for hand motor recovery in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. , 2016, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[33]  N. Vanacore,et al.  The Use of New Mobile and Gaming Technologies for the Assessment and Rehabilitation of People with Ataxia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2020, The Cerebellum.