Development of a controlled vocabulary for semantic interoperability of mineral exploration geodata for mining projects

Semantic interoperability of mineral exploration geodata is a long-term concern in mining projects. Inconsistent conceptual schemas and heterogeneous professional terms among various geodata sources in a mining project often hinder their efficient use and/or reuse. Our study of a controlled vocabulary focuses on interoperability of mineral exploration geodata of different mining projects of a mining group in China. In order to achieve this purpose, a proper representation of concepts and their inter-relationships in the knowledge domain of mineral exploration for mining projects is proposed. In addition, we propose that for wider interoperability of mining project geodata the controlled vocabulary underpinning them should be interoperable with concepts in related applications in the mineral exploration domain. In developing our controlled vocabulary, we adopted/adapted national standards of geosciences taxonomies and terminologies. The organization structure of terms, coding method, metadata schema for database applications and an extensible structure of our controlled vocabulary are discussed. The controlled vocabulary we developed was then used to reconcile heterogeneous geodata and to set up integrated databases for various mining projects of the mining group. Our study shows that a properly organized controlled vocabulary not only allows for efficient reconciliation of heterogeneous geodata sources in similar or related projects, but also makes related geodata to be interoperable with extramural applications in the same knowledge domain.

[1]  Véronique Malaisé,et al.  A Method to Convert Thesauri to SKOS , 2006, ESWC.

[2]  Markus Pizka,et al.  Concise and consistent naming , 2005, 13th International Workshop on Program Comprehension (IWPC'05).

[3]  A Rossi Mori,et al.  Coding systems and controlled vocabularies for hospital information systems. , 1995, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[4]  Stanisław Ostaficzuk,et al.  The current role of geological mapping in geosciences , 2005 .

[5]  Hermann Helbig,et al.  Knowledge Representation and the Semantics of Natural Language , 2005, Cognitive Technologies.

[6]  Maria Teresa Pazienza,et al.  Information Extraction A Multidisciplinary Approach to an Emerging Information Technology , 1997, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  T. V. Loudon.  Geoscience After IT: A View of the Present and Future Impact of Information Technology on Geoscience , 2011 .

[8]  Frehiwot Fisseha,et al.  Reengineering Thesauri for New Applications: The AGROVOC Example , 2006, J. Digit. Inf..

[9]  U Bellugi,et al.  Language, name, and concept. , 1970, Science.

[10]  WU Chong-long.  Theory and Method Problems of Informatization of Geological Surveying and Mineral Resource Exploration , 2005 .

[11]  Robert G. Raskin,et al.  Knowledge representation in the semantic web for Earth and environmental terminology (SWEET) , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[12]  S. Auerbach,et al.  Computer-aided geometric design of geologic surfaces and bodies , 1990 .

[13]  G. N. Rassam,et al.  International cooperation in geoscience information : A global challenge , 1990 .

[14]  Christopher A. Welty.  Ontology-Driven Conceptual Modeling , 2002, CAiSE.

[15]  Chloe,et al.  OneGeology:Making Geological Map Data for the Earth Accessible , 2009 .

[16]  E.J.M Carranza,et al.  GDI for mineral resources development , 2004 .

[17]  Gobinda G. Chowdhury,et al.  Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to Its Full Potential , 2004 .

[18]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Formal Ontology and Information Systems , 1998 .

[19]  Nicola Guarino.  UNDERSTANDING, BUILDING, AND USING ONTOLOGIES , 1997 .

[20]  Xiaogang Ma,et al.  Point - source database theory and its application in database architecture design of digital mine , 2007 .

[21]  ScienceDirect.  Drug discovery today. Biosilico , 2004 .

[22]  Surya S. Durbha,et al.  A framework for semantic reconciliation of disparate earth observation thematic data , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[23]  J. Cimino.  Desiderata for Controlled Medical Vocabularies in the Twenty-First Century , 1998, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[24]  Linda Bibby,et al.  Establishing vocabularies for the exchange of geological map data-how to herd stray cats , 2006 .

[25]  Maria T. Pazienza,et al.  Information Extraction , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[26]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to Its Full Potential , 2002 .

[27]  M. Gillespie,et al.  BGS Rock Classification Scheme Volume 1 Classification of igneous rocks , 1999 .

[28]  John S. Oldow,et al.  Designing a modular architecture for the structural geology ontology , 2006 .

[29]  O Wigertz,et al.  The Data Dictionary – A Controlled Vocabulary for Integrating Clinical Databases and Medical Knowledge Bases , 1989, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[30]  Waralak V. Siricharoen,et al.  Using Ontologies to Create Object Model for Object-Oriented Software Engineering , 2007, Ontologies.

[31]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[32]  Ian Jackson.  OneGeology : making geological map data for the earth accessible , 2007 .

[33]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  Ontologies Come of Age , 2003, Spinning the Semantic Web.

[34]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  Towards a Reference Volcano Ontology for Semantic Scientific Data Integration , 2006 .

[35]  H. Belshaw,et al.  The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations , 1947, International Organization.

[36]  Chen Ting.  Chinese Field Matching Algorithm , 2003 .

[37]  Michael Piasecki,et al.  Metadata Community Profiles for the Semantic Web , 2006, GeoInformatica.

[38]  L. Stein,et al.  Plant Ontology (PO): a Controlled Vocabulary of Plant Structures and Growth Stages , 2005, Comparative and functional genomics.

[39]  Leo Obrst,et al.  Ontologies for semantically interoperable systems , 2003, CIKM '03.

[40]  Vijayan Sugumaran,et al.  The role of domain ontologies in database design: An ontology management and conceptual modeling environment , 2006, TODS.

[41]  Anita Sundaram Coleman,et al.  Controlled vocabularies as a sphere of influence , 2006 .

[42]  Florian Probst,et al.  Enabling Cross-Disciplinary E-Science by Integrating Geoscience Ontologies with Dolce , 2009, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[43]  Rajiv Kishore,et al.  Ontologies: A Handbook of Principles, Concepts and Applications in Information Systems , 2007, Ontologies.

[44]  Branimir Boguraev,et al.  Technical Terminology for Domain Specification and Content Characterisation , 1997, SCIE.

[45]  David R. Soller,et al.  The U.S. National Geologic Map Database Project: Overview & Progress , 2005 .

[46]  Stephen M. Richard,et al.  Vocabularies for Geoscience Information Interchange , 2009 .

[47]  Stephen M. Richard,et al.  Development for the National Geologic Map Database , 2004 .

[48]  Jens Klump,et al.  A tree for rocks—hierarchies in stratigraphic databases , 2003 .

[49]  Barry Smith,et al.  Controlled vocabularies in bioinformatics: a case study in the gene ontology , 2004 .

[50]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Ontologies and semantics for seamless connectivity , 2004, SGMD.