Protocol for site selection and movement assessment for the myoelectric control of a multi-functional upper-limb prosthesis

Although there have been many advances in electromyography (EMG) signal processing and pattern recognition (PR) for the control of multi-functional upper-limb prostheses, some the outstanding problems need to be solved before practical PR-based prostheses can be put into service. Some of these are the lack of training and deployment protocols and the provision of the tools required. Therefore, we present a preliminary procedure to personalize the prosthesis deployment. In the first step, we record the demographic information of each individual amputee person and their background. In the second step of the protocol, the EMG signals are acquired. PR algorithms and parameters will be chosen in the 3rd step of the protocol. In the 4th step, the best number of EMG sensors to achieve the maximal performance with a full set of gestures is identified. The final step involves finding the best set of movements that the amputee person can produce with an accuracy > 95% as well as identifying the movements with the worst performance, which would require further training. This proposed approach is validated with 2 transradial amputees.

[1]  Trent J. Bradberry,et al.  Reconstructing Three-Dimensional Hand Movements from Noninvasive Electroencephalographic Signals , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Ashok Muzumdar,et al.  Powered Upper Limb Prostheses , 2004, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[3]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[5]  Vincenzo Parenti-Castelli,et al.  Development of a prosthesis shoulder mechanism for upper limb amputees: application of an original design methodology to optimize functionality and wearability , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[6]  Vincenzo Parenti-Castelli,et al.  DESIGN OF UPPER LIMB PROSTHESES: A NEW SUBJECT-ORIENTED APPROACH , 2005 .

[7]  H. Hermens,et al.  European recommendations for surface electromyography: Results of the SENIAM Project , 1999 .

[8]  D. Datta,et al.  The experience of men using an upper limb prosthesis following amputation: Positive coping and minimizing feeling different , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation.

[9]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[10]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Investigating Classification Parameters for Continuous Myoelectrically Controlled Prostheses , 2005 .

[11]  Ashok Muzumdar Powered upper limb prostheses : control, implementation and clinical application , 2004 .

[12]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  Kristin Østlie,et al.  Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[14]  Guido Bugmann,et al.  Classification of Finger Movements for the Dexterous Hand Prosthesis Control With Surface Electromyography , 2013, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.