Pioneering customers as change agents for new energy efficiency services—an empirical study in the Finnish electricity markets

Energy companies are in dire need of new business models that bring revenues from energy services rather than from increasing energy use. Smart meters and grids offer new opportunities for such services. However, there is a lack of research on what the market potential of such services could be in end-user markets. Certain innovative consumers are more likely to be the first to test new technology-based services and engage in new service co-creation. However, identification of such innovator or lead user customers is difficult especially for electricity end-use efficiency, an invisible and unexciting service for most consumers. This article identifies pioneering customers for novel energy efficiency services offered by electricity providers in terms of psychological factors from an empirical data collected with a consumer survey in spring 2013. We also analyse the similarities and differences between pioneering customers and the mass market with the principal component analysis. We find that certain characteristics of pioneering customers (expertise, ahead-of-the-market needs) could become more widespread in the market due to rising energy prices and improved billing and metering. However, some other aspects contributing to innovativeness (such as experimentalism) are less likely to develop among average consumers, who are more likely to rely on leading companies and seek recommendations from peers before obtaining new services. These differences among consumers need to be taken into account in order to offer consumers usable and useful products and peer group-relevant marketing.

[1]  Christian Homburg,et al.  Does Customer Interaction Enhance New Product Success , 2000 .

[2]  Rebecca L. Medway,et al.  When More Gets You Less: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Concurrent Web Options on Mail Survey Response Rates , 2012 .

[3]  Miriam Fischlein,et al.  Information Strategies and Energy Conservation Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies from 1975 to 2012 , 2013 .

[4]  E. Hippel,et al.  FROM EXPERIENCE: Developing New Product Concepts Via the Lead User Method: A Case Study in a “Low-Tech” Field , 1992 .

[5]  Peter H. Bloch THE PRODUCT ENTHUSIAST: IMPLICATIONS FOR MARKETING STRATEGY , 1986 .

[6]  Geoffrey A. Moore,et al.  Crossing the Chasm , 1991 .

[7]  I. Vassileva,et al.  Understanding energy consumption behavior for future demand response strategy development , 2012 .

[8]  Ijeoma Onyeji,et al.  Consumer engagement: An insight from smart grid projects in Europe , 2013 .

[9]  E. Bjørnstad,et al.  A policy model for diffusion of electricity saving technologies , 2009 .

[10]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[11]  M. Pierre,et al.  Driving an electric vehicle. A sociological analysis on pioneer users , 2011 .

[12]  John Roberts,et al.  The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status , 2004 .

[13]  Inge Røpke,et al.  Constructing users in the smart grid—insights from the Danish eFlex project , 2013 .

[14]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Potential carbon impacts of smart grid development in six European countries , 2013 .

[15]  Michael Nye,et al.  Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term , 2013 .

[16]  Julia Sophie Woersdorfer,et al.  Will nonowners follow pioneer consumers in the adoption of solar thermal systems? Empirical evidence for northwestern Germany , 2011 .

[17]  Frédéric Klopfert,et al.  Empowering consumers through smart metering, a report for the BEUC , 2011 .

[18]  E. Hippel,et al.  Users as Service Innovators: The Case of Banking Services , 2011 .

[19]  Eberhard Jochem,et al.  Society, behaviour, and climate change mitigation , 2000 .

[20]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  The Lead User Method: An Outline of Empirical Findings and Issues for Future Research , 2004 .

[21]  Willett Kempton,et al.  The Legacy of Twenty Years of Energy Demand Management: we know more about Individual Behaviour but next to Nothing about Demand , 2000 .

[22]  E. Mlecnik,et al.  From demonstration projects to volume market: Market development for advanced housing renovation , 2010 .

[23]  E. Shove,et al.  Infrastructures of Consumption: Restructuring the Utility Industries. , 2005 .

[24]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Infrastructures of Consumption: Environmental Innovation in the Utility Industries , 2005 .

[25]  Reinhard Prügl,et al.  Lead users and the adoption and diffusion of new products: Insights from two extreme sports communities , 2006 .

[26]  H. Ernst,et al.  Identification of Lead Users for Consumer Products via Virtual Stock Markets , 2009 .

[27]  Corinna Fischer Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? , 2008 .

[28]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  Exploring emerging customer needs for smart grid applications , 2011, 2011 2nd IEEE PES International Conference and Exhibition on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies.

[29]  I. Ruostetsaari Governance and political consumerism in Finnish energy policy-making , 2009 .

[30]  H. Herring,et al.  Improving the energy performance of UK households: Results from surveys of consumer adoption and use of low- and zero-carbon technologies , 2008 .

[31]  M. Orsini,et al.  Household appropriation of electricity monitors , 2011 .

[32]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  A lead user study of electronic home banking services : lessons from the learning curve , 1996 .

[33]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Social learning and public policy: Lessons from an energy-conscious village , 2006 .