Location protection method for mobile crowd sensing based on local differential privacy preference

In view of the location privacy problem of participants in mobile crowd sensing, this paper proposes a method to protect the location of participants based on local differential privacy preference. First of all, the map is discretized and mapped from two-dimensional space to one-dimensional space by means of MHC, which can guarantee the spatial correlation, and the map is segmented based on the density of participants using genetic algorithm; Then, according to the personal privacy needs of current location, two different local differential privacy perturbation methods, RAPPOR and k-RR, are chosen by participants; Next, the chosen local differential privacy is used to perturb the location of each participant in the region after segmentation, and the perturbed location data are sent to the data collection server to protect the participants’ locations. Finally, the simulation experiments are carried out and show that map density segmentation can reduce the privacy cost, and the method proposed in this paper is superior to the method using k-anonymous and differential privacy and the method using Hilbert and differential privacy in terms of running time and average relative error, and prove that the execution time is lower and the data availability is improved.

[1]  Frank Stajano,et al.  Location Privacy in Pervasive Computing , 2003, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[2]  Úlfar Erlingsson,et al.  RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Response , 2014, CCS.

[3]  Zhu Wang,et al.  Mobile Crowd Sensing and Computing , 2015, ACM Comput. Surv..

[4]  Marco Gruteser,et al.  USENIX Association , 1992 .

[5]  Sheng Zhong,et al.  A Jointly Differentially Private Scheduling Protocol for Ridesharing Services , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[6]  Peter Kairouz,et al.  Discrete Distribution Estimation under Local Privacy , 2016, ICML.

[7]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  Incentives for Mobile Crowd Sensing: A Survey , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[8]  Gui Xiaolin,et al.  A User-Centric Location Privacy-Preserving Method with Differential Perturbation for Location-Based Services , 2016 .

[9]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Differential privacy and robust statistics , 2009, STOC '09.

[10]  Nick Koudas,et al.  The design of a query monitoring system , 2009, TODS.

[11]  Ling Liu,et al.  Attack-Resilient Mix-zones over Road Networks: Architecture and Algorithms , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[12]  Tao Li,et al.  DPSense: Differentially Private Crowdsourced Spectrum Sensing , 2016, CCS.

[13]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis , 2006, TCC.

[14]  Sofya Raskhodnikova,et al.  What Can We Learn Privately? , 2008, FOCS.

[15]  Aaron Roth,et al.  Mechanism design in large games: incentives and privacy , 2012, ITCS.

[16]  Rinku Dewri,et al.  Local Differential Perturbations: Location Privacy under Approximate Knowledge Attackers , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[17]  Moni Naor,et al.  Our Data, Ourselves: Privacy Via Distributed Noise Generation , 2006, EUROCRYPT.

[18]  Walid G. Aref,et al.  Casper*: Query processing for location services without compromising privacy , 2006, TODS.

[19]  Bin Guo,et al.  From participatory sensing to Mobile Crowd Sensing , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PERCOM WORKSHOPS).

[20]  Xiaocong Jin,et al.  Privacy-preserving crowdsourced spectrum sensing , 2016, IEEE INFOCOM 2016 - The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.