Impaired classical eyeblink conditioning in cerebellar-lesioned and Purkinje cell degeneration (pcd) mutant mice

Converging lines of evidence from rabbits, rats, and humans argue for the crucial involvement of the cerebellum in classical conditioning of the eyeblink/nictitating membrane response in mammals. For example, selective lesions (permanent or reversible) of the cerebellum block both acquisition and retention of eyeblink conditioning. Correspondingly, electrophysiological and brain-imaging studies indicate learning-related plasticity in the cerebellum. The involvement of the cerebellum in eyeblink conditioning is also supported by stimulation studies showing that direct stimulation of the two major afferents to the cerebellum (the mossy fibers emanating from the pontine nucleus and climbing fibers originating from the inferior olive) can substitute for the peripheral conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US), respectively, to yield normal behavioral learning. In the present study, we examined the relative contribution of the cerebellar cortex versus deep nuclei (specifically the interpositus nucleus) in eyeblink learning by using mutant mice deficient of Purkinje cells, the exclusive output neurons of the cerebellar cortex. We report that Purkinje cell degeneration (pcd) mice exhibit a profound impairment in the acquisition of delay eyeblink conditioning in comparison with their wild-type littermates. Nevertheless, the pcd animals did acquire a subnormal level of conditioned eyeblink responses. In contrast, wild-type mice with lesions of the interpositus nucleus were completely unable to learn the conditioned eyeblink response. These results suggest that both cerebellar cortex and deep nuclei are important for normal eyeblink conditioning.

[1]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Classical conditioning using stimulation of the inferior olive as the unconditioned stimulus. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  D. Woodruff-Pak,et al.  Purkinje cell number related to rate of classical conditioning. , 1990, Neuroreport.

[3]  M. Mauk,et al.  Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Neural mechanisms of classical conditioning in mammals. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[5]  Y Shinoda,et al.  Axon collaterals of mossy fibers from the pontine nucleus in the cerebellar dentate nucleus. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  J. Courville,et al.  Projections from the inferior olive to the cerebellar nuclei in the cat demonstrated by retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase , 1977, Brain Research.

[7]  Masao Ito,et al.  Climbing fibre induced depression of both mossy fibre responsiveness and glutamate sensitivity of cerebellar Purkinje cells , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Neuronal responses of the rabbit cerebellum during acquisition and performance of a classically conditioned nictitating membrane-eyelid response , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  G. A. Clark,et al.  Effects of lesions of cerebellar nuclei on conditioned behavioral and hippocampal neuronal responses , 1984, Brain Research.

[10]  V. Chan‐Palay.  Cerebellar Dentate Nucleus: Organization, Cytology and Transmitters , 1977 .

[11]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Mammalian brain substrates of aversive classical conditioning. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Deficient Cerebellar Long-Term Depression, Impaired Eyeblink Conditioning, and Normal Motor Coordination in GFAP Mutant Mice , 1996, Neuron.

[13]  A. F. Nordholm,et al.  Lidocaine infusion in a critical region of cerebellum completely prevents learning of the conditioned eyeblink response. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[14]  David A. McCormick,et al.  Ipsilateral cerebellar lesions prevent learning of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane/eyelid response , 1982, Brain Research.

[15]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Temporal specificity of long-term depression in parallel fiber--Purkinje synapses in rat cerebellar slice. , 1995, Learning & memory.

[16]  J. Steinmetz,et al.  Acquisition of classical conditioning without cerebellar cortex , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  D J Rosen,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response with a mossy-fiber stimulation CS: I. Pontine nuclei and middle cerebellar peduncle stimulation. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[18]  Robert Lalonde,et al.  Spontaneous alternation and exploration in staggerer mutant mice , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Lesions of the inferior olivary complex cause extinction of the classically conditioned eyeblink response , 1985, Brain Research.

[20]  Y. Prigent.  [Long term depression]. , 1989, Annales medico-psychologiques.

[21]  R. J. Mullen,et al.  Purkinje cell degeneration, a new neurological mutation in the mouse. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Classical conditioning in rabbits using pontine nucleus stimulation as a conditioned stimulus and inferior olive stimulation as an unconditioned stimulus , 1989, Synapse.

[23]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Effect of kainic acid lesions of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus on eyelid conditioning in the rabbit , 1985, Brain Research.

[24]  M. Botez,et al.  Spontaneous alternation and habituation in Purkinje cell degeneration mutant mice , 1987, Brain Research.

[25]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response. , 1984, Science.

[26]  G. A. Clark,et al.  The engram found? Role of the cerebellum in classical conditioning of nictitating membrane and eyelid responses , 1981 .

[27]  M. Kano,et al.  Long-term depression of parallel fibre synapses following stimulation of climbing fibres , 1985, Brain Research.

[28]  Robert Lalonde,et al.  Spontaneous alternation and exploration in weaver mutant mice , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[29]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Localization of a memory trace in the mammalian brain. , 1993, Science.

[30]  J. Voogd,et al.  The Olivocerebellar Projection in the Cat , 1982 .

[31]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Learning and memory in the vestibulo-ocular reflex. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[32]  R. J. Mullen,et al.  Two new types of retinal degeneration in cerebellar mutant mice , 1975, Nature.

[33]  Charles R. Goodlett,et al.  Dissociation of spatial navigation and visual guidance performance in Purkinje cell degeneration (pcd) mutant mice , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[34]  D. Linden,et al.  Long-term synaptic depression in the mammalian brain , 1994, Neuron.

[35]  Dan Goldowitz,et al.  Genetic Mutations Affecting Murine Cerebellar Structure and Function , 1992 .

[36]  G. Lynch,et al.  The neurobiology of learning and memory , 1989, Cognition.

[37]  M. Glickstein,et al.  Discrete lesions of the cerebellar cortex abolish the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response of the rabbit , 1984, Behavioural Brain Research.

[38]  G. Bishop,et al.  Electrophysiological and horseradish peroxidase studies of precerebellar afferents to the nucleus interpositus anterior. II. Mossy fiber system , 1977, Brain Research.

[39]  R. Clark,et al.  Reversible lesions of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus during acquisition and retention of a classically conditioned behavior. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[40]  M. Mauk,et al.  Extinction of conditioned eyelid responses requires the anterior lobe of cerebellar cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[41]  S. T. Kitai,et al.  Electrophysiological and horseradish peroxidase studies of precerebellar afferents to the nucleus interpositus anterior. I. Climbing fiber system , 1977, Brain Research.

[42]  N Birbaumer,et al.  Classical conditioning after cerebellar lesions in humans. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[43]  S. Tonegawa,et al.  Deficient cerebellar long-term depression and impaired motor learning in mGluR1 mutant mice , 1994, Cell.

[44]  M. Botez,et al.  Spontaneous alternation and habituation in a t-maze in nervous mutant mice. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[45]  C. Gerfen,et al.  An anterograde neuroanatomical tracing method that shows the detailed morphology of neurons, their axons and terminals: Immunohistochemical localization of an axonally transported plant lectin,Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) , 1984, Brain Research.

[46]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Impaired motor coordination correlates with persistent multiple climbing fiber innervation in PKCγ mutant mice , 1995, Cell.

[47]  伊藤 正男.  The cerebellum and neural control , 1984 .

[48]  R. Skelton,et al.  Bilateral cerebellar lesions disrupt conditioned eyelid responses in unrestrained rats. , 1988, Behavioral neuroscience.

[49]  B. Schreurs,et al.  A functional anatomical study of associative learning in humans. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  G. Mihailoff,et al.  Identification of pontocerebellar axon collateral synaptic boutons in the rat cerebellar nuclei , 1994, Brain Research.

[51]  J E Steinmetz,et al.  Possible conditioned stimulus pathway for classical eyelid conditioning in rabbits. I. Anatomical evidence for direct projections from the pontine nuclei to the cerebellar interpositus nucleus. , 1992, Behavioral and neural biology.

[52]  D. Alkon,et al.  Learning-specific differences in Purkinje-cell dendrites of lobule HVI (Lobulus simplex): intracellular recording in a rabbit cerebellar slice , 1991, Brain Research.

[53]  R. J. Mullen,et al.  The development and degeneration of Purkinje cells in pcd mutant mice , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.