Force quantification and simulation of pedicle screw tract palpation using direct visuo-haptic volume rendering

We present a feasibility study for the visuo-haptic simulation of pedicle screw tract palpation in virtual reality, using an approach that requires no manual processing or segmentation of the volumetric medical data set. In a first experiment, we quantified the forces and torques present during the palpation of a pedicle screw tract in a real boar vertebra. We equipped a ball-tipped pedicle probe with a 6-axis force/torque sensor and a motion capture marker cluster. We simultaneously recorded the pose of the probe relative to the vertebra and measured the generated forces and torques during palpation. This allowed us replaying the recorded palpation movements in our simulator and to fine-tune the haptic rendering to approximate the measured forces and torques. In a second experiment, we asked two neurosurgeons to palpate a virtual version of the same vertebra in our simulator, while we logged the forces and torques sent to the haptic device. In the experiments with the real vertebra, the maximum measured force along the longitudinal axis of the probe was 7.78 N and the maximum measured bending torque was 0.13 Nm. In an offline simulation of the motion of the pedicle probe recorded during the palpation of a real pedicle screw tract, our approach generated forces and torques that were similar in magnitude and progression to the measured ones. When surgeons tested our simulator, the distributions of the computed forces and torques were similar to the measured ones; however, higher forces and torques occurred more frequently. We demonstrated the suitability of direct visual and haptic volume rendering to simulate a specific surgical procedure. Our approach of fine-tuning the simulation by measuring the forces and torques that are prevalent while palpating a real vertebra produced promising results.

[1]  F. Grochulla,et al.  Manual of spine surgery , 2012 .

[2]  D. Polly,et al.  Probing for Thoracic Pedicle Screw Tract Violation(s): Is It Valid? , 2004, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[3]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[4]  Ravindra Hegadi,et al.  A Systematic Review on Orthopedic Simulators for Psycho-Motor Skill and Surgical Procedure Training , 2018, Journal of Medical Systems.

[5]  Alexander Mason,et al.  The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[6]  M. Downes,et al.  Simulation in Neurosurgery: A Review of Computer-Based Simulation Environments and Their Surgical Applications , 2010, Neurosurgery.

[7]  Agnes Roby-Brami,et al.  Upper-Limb Robotic Exoskeletons for Neurorehabilitation: A Review on Control Strategies , 2016, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Jason E. Blatt,et al.  Tactile Skill-Based Neurosurgical Simulators are Effective and Inexpensive. , 2020, World neurosurgery.

[9]  Lu Ton,et al.  The Learning Curve of Pedicle Screw Placement: How Many Screws Are Enough? , 2009, Spine.

[10]  L. Lenke,et al.  Free Hand Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic Spine: Is it Safe? , 2004, Spine.

[11]  R. Betz,et al.  Feasibility and Accuracy of Pedicle Screws in Children Younger Than Eight Years of Age , 2009, Spine.

[12]  Jing Ren,et al.  Dynamic 3-D Virtual Fixtures for Minimally Invasive Beating Heart Procedures , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Ahmed A. Aoude,et al.  Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[14]  R. Verma,et al.  Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5,992 pedicle screws , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[15]  Constantin Schizas,et al.  Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy: A Meta-analysis , 2007, Spine.

[16]  I. Mainland,et al.  Macro- and micromorphological features of lifestyle differences in pigs and wild boar , 2007 .

[17]  Philippe C. Cattin,et al.  Direct Visual and Haptic Volume Rendering of Medical Data Sets for an Immersive Exploration in Virtual Reality , 2019, MICCAI.

[18]  W. Castro,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Vertebrae , 1996, Spine.

[19]  R. G. Richards,et al.  Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. , 2007, European cells & materials.

[20]  Blair Calancie,et al.  Is in vivo manual palpation for thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation reliable? , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[21]  K. Schaller,et al.  Clinically relevant complications related to pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar surgery and their management: a literature review of 35,630 pedicle screws. , 2011, Neurosurgical focus.

[22]  David M. Sedory,et al.  The Reliability of the Ball-Tipped Probe for Detecting Pedicle Screw Tract Violations Prior to Instrumenting the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine , 2010, Spine.

[23]  Nikolaos K. Paschos,et al.  Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[24]  Chen Weishan,et al.  Learning curve of thoracic pedicle screw placement using the free-hand technique in scoliosis: how many screws needed for an apprentice? , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[25]  Stephen D. Laycock,et al.  A Survey of Haptic Rendering Techniques , 2007, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[26]  Ricardo S. Avila,et al.  A haptic interaction method for volume visualization , 1996, Proceedings of Seventh Annual IEEE Visualization '96.

[27]  David M. Sedory,et al.  The Reliability of the Ball-tipped Probe for Detecting Pedicle Screw Tract Violations Prior to Instrumenting the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine , 2010 .