REVIVING URBAN STREAMS: LAND USE, HYDROLOGY, BIOLOGY, AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR 1

: Successful stream rehabilitation requires a shift from narrow analysis and management to integrated understanding of the links between human actions and changing river health. At study sites in the Puget Sound lowlands of western Washington State, landscape, hydrological, and biological conditions were evaluated for streams flowing through watersheds with varying levels of urban development. At all spatial scales, stream biological condition measured by the benthic index of biological integrity (B-IBI) declined as impervious area increased. Impervious area alone, however, is a flawed surrogate of river health. Hydrologic metrics that reflect chronic altered streamflows, for example, provide a direct mechanistic link between the changes associated with urban development and declines in stream biological condition. These measures provide a more sensitive understanding of stream basin response to urban development than do treatment of each increment of impervious area equally. Land use in residential backyards adjacent to streams also heavily influences stream condition. Successful stream rehabilitation thus requires coordinated diagnosis of the causes of degradation and integrative management to treat the range of ecological stressors within each urban area, and it depends on remedies appropriate at scales from backyards to regional storm water systems.

[1]  J. Allan,et al.  The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales , 1997 .

[2]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Partial entrainment of gravel bars during floods , 2002 .

[3]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Untangling Multiple Factors in Spatial Distributions: Lilies, Gophers, and Rocks , 1996 .

[4]  J. Karr,et al.  Applying public health lessons to protect river health , 2001 .

[5]  J. Meyer,et al.  Streams in the Urban Landscape , 2001 .

[6]  James R. Karr,et al.  Sustaining living rivers , 2000, Hydrobiologia.

[7]  Luna B. Leopold,et al.  Hydrology for urban land plan-ning-a guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use , 1968 .

[8]  R. M. Goldstein,et al.  Assessing Water Quality at Large Geographic Scales: Relations Among Land Use, Water Physicochemistry, Riparian Condition, and Fish Community Structure , 2003, Environmental management.

[9]  D. Booth,et al.  Effectiveness of large woody debris in stream rehabilitation projects in urban basins , 2001 .

[10]  J. Lichatowich,et al.  Salmon Without Rivers: A History Of The Pacific Salmon Crisis , 1999 .

[11]  James R. Karr,et al.  Biological Assessment and Criteria Improve Total Maximum Daily Load Decision Making , 2004 .

[12]  S. Burges,et al.  Urban Stream Rehabilitation in the Pacific Northwest , 2001 .

[13]  C. Jackson,et al.  URBANIZATION OF AQUATIC SYSTEMS: DEGRADATION THRESHOLDS, STORMWATER DETECTION, AND THE LIMITS OF MITIGATION 1 , 1997 .

[14]  S. Burges,et al.  HYDROLOGIC MITIGATION USING ON-SITE RESIDENTIAL STORM-WATER DETENTION , 2001 .

[15]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[16]  C. Kendall,et al.  Analysis of δ15N and δ18O to differentiate NO3− sources in runoff at two watersheds in the Catskill Mountains of New York , 2002 .

[17]  N. Grimm,et al.  Integrated Approaches to Long-TermStudies of Urban Ecological Systems , 2000 .

[18]  James R. Karr,et al.  Assessing Invertebrate Responses to Human Activities: Evaluating Alternative Approaches , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[19]  James R. Karr,et al.  Rivers as Sentinels: Using the Biology of Rivers to Guide Landscape Management , 1998 .

[20]  V. Shelford,et al.  Methods for the Study of Stream Communities , 1929 .

[21]  J. Allan,et al.  Functional Organization of Stream Fish Assemblages in Relation to Hydrological Variability , 1995 .

[22]  James R. Karr,et al.  Assessing and Restoring the Health of Urban Streams in the Puget Sound Basin , 2002 .

[23]  Lawrence E. Band,et al.  Down by the riverside: urban riparian ecology , 2003 .

[24]  G. Pickup,et al.  Effects of hydrologic regime on magnitude and frequency of dominant discharge , 1976 .

[25]  H. Odum.  Primary Production in Flowing Waters1 , 1956 .

[26]  R. Sidle.  Bed load transport regime of a small forest stream , 1988 .

[27]  R. Klein.  URBANIZATION AND STREAM QUALITY IMPAIRMENT , 1979 .

[28]  W. Langbein.  Annual floods and the partial‐duration flood series , 1949 .

[29]  E. Lorin,et al.  Consequences of urbanization on aquatic systems; measured effects, degradation thresholds, and corrective strategies , 1993 .

[30]  Molly O'Meara Sheehan.  City Limits: Putting the Brakes on Sprawl , 1990 .

[31]  E. Anderson.  Ecologies of the Heart: Emotion, Belief, and the Environment , 1996 .

[32]  S. Pickett,et al.  Integrated urban ecosystem research , 1997, Urban Ecosystems.

[33]  Xinhao Wang,et al.  Integrating water-quality management and land-use planning in a watershed context. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[34]  Tom Schueler,et al.  practice of watershed protection , 2000 .

[35]  J. Karr,et al.  Restoring life in running waters : better biological monitoring , 1998 .

[36]  N. Grimm,et al.  Integrated Approaches to Long-TermStudies of Urban Ecological Systems , 2000 .

[37]  D. Booth,et al.  FOREST COVER, IMPERVIOUS‐SURFACE AREA, AND THE MITIGATION OF STORMWATER IMPACTS 1 , 2002 .

[38]  G. Hollis.  The Effect of Urbanization on Floods of Different Recurrence Interval , 1975 .

[39]  Robert J. Steedman,et al.  Modification and Assessment of an Index of Biotic Integrity to Quantify Stream Quality in Southern Ontario , 1988 .

[40]  M. Alberti,et al.  Integrating Humans into Ecology: Opportunities and Challenges for Studying Urban Ecosystems , 2003 .

[41]  R. Horwitz.  Temporal Variability Patterns and the Distributional Patterns of Stream Fishes , 1978 .