Mis- and About Covid-19 Misinformation in Germany During the Covid-19 Pandemic A Cross-Sectional Survey on Citizens’ Perceptions and Individual Differences in the Belief in False Information

During the Covid-19 pandemic, people have been exposed to vast amounts of misinformation. This “infodemic” has undermined key behavioural and pharmacological measures to contain the pandemic. In a cross-sectional survey of residents of Germany, we investigated the perceived prevalence of misinformation, the strategies people reported using to discern between true and false information, and individual differences in beliefs in misinformation at three time points from June 2020 to February 2021 ( N = 3324). We observed four main results. First, there was an increase in the perceived prevalence of misinformation over time. Second, the most believed false claims included that the virus is no worse than the flu and that the EU has approved dangerous vaccines. Third, belief in misinformation was associated with support for the far-right AfD party; reliance on tabloids, neighbours and social media for information; lower levels of education; and migration background. Fourth, only about half of the respondents reported using strategies such as checking for consistency between different sources to identify misinformation. These results can inform the development of interventions, such as boosting the ability to discern accurate from misleading information, or enriching specific environments (e.g., neighbourhoods with high rates of migration) with accessible and high-quality information.

[1]  S. Wineburg,et al.  Lateral reading on the open Internet: A district-wide field study in high school government classes. , 2022, Journal of Educational Psychology.

[2]  Oliver Quiring,et al.  Political Information Use and Its Relationship to Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Among the German Public , 2021, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly.

[3]  S. M. Jones-Jang,et al.  Red Media, Blue Media, Trump Briefings, and COVID-19: Examining How Information Sources Predict Risk Preventive Behaviors via Threat and Efficacy , 2021, Health communication.

[4]  Carlos A. Almenara,et al.  Trust in government regarding COVID-19 and its associations with preventive health behaviour and prosocial behaviour during the pandemic: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study , 2021, Psychological Medicine.

[5]  L. Frischlich,et al.  Trust, Democratic Resilience, and the Infodemic , 2021 .

[6]  H. Larson,et al.  Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA , 2021, Nature Human Behaviour.

[7]  S. van der Linden,et al.  Science skepticism in times of COVID-19 , 2021, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.

[8]  S. Katikireddi,et al.  Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK household longitudinal study , 2021, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity.

[9]  M. Back,et al.  Right-wing authoritarianism, conspiracy mentality, and susceptibility to distorted alternative news , 2021, Social Influence.

[10]  Daniel R. Little,et al.  The acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for COVID-19 in Australia , 2020, PloS one.

[11]  J. Jost,et al.  The Paranoid Style in American Politics Revisited: An Ideological Asymmetry in Conspiratorial Thinking , 2021 .

[12]  Anonymous,et al.  MANAGING THE COVID-19 INFODEMIC: PROMOTING HEALTHY BEHAVIOURS AND MITIGATING THE HARM FROM MISINFORMATION AND DISINFORMATION , 2020, Saudi Medical Journal.

[13]  S. van der Linden,et al.  Inoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19 , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[14]  David G. Rand,et al.  The Debunking Handbook 2020 , 2020 .

[15]  Jon Roozenbeek,et al.  Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world , 2020, Royal Society Open Science.

[16]  Leeann N Siegel,et al.  Association of COVID-19 Misinformation with Face Mask Wearing and Social Distancing in a Nationally Representative US Sample , 2020, Health communication.

[17]  Piper Liping Liu,et al.  Digital Disinformation About COVID-19 and the Third-Person Effect: Examining the Channel Differences and Negative Emotional Outcomes , 2020, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[18]  Benjamin A. Lyons,et al.  A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Niels G. Mede,et al.  Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands toward science , 2020, Public understanding of science.

[20]  S. Dohle,et al.  Supplementary materials to: Acceptance and adoption of protective measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of trust in politics and trust in science , 2020 .

[21]  Joanne M. Miller Do COVID-19 Conspiracy Theory Beliefs Form a Monological Belief System? , 2020, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[22]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  How Well Do People Report Time Spent on Facebook?: An Evaluation of Established Survey Questions with Recommendations , 2020, CHI.

[23]  K. Sassenberg,et al.  Conspiracy Theories and Their Societal Effects During the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2020, Social Psychological and Personality Science.

[24]  Svenja Boberg,et al.  Pandemic Populism: Facebook Pages of Alternative News Media and the Corona Crisis - A Computational Content Analysis , 2020, ArXiv.

[25]  N. Plohl,et al.  Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: the critical role of trust in science , 2020, Psychology, health & medicine.

[26]  H. Li,et al.  YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation? , 2020, BMJ Global Health.

[27]  Matthias Kohring,et al.  Mistrust, Disinforming News, and Vote Choice: A Panel Survey on the Origins and Consequences of Believing Disinformation in the 2017 German Parliamentary Election , 2020, Political Communication.

[28]  C. Betsch,et al.  Germany COVID-19 Snapshot MOnitoring (COSMO Germany): Monitoring knowledge, risk perceptions, preventive behaviours, and public trust in the current coronavirus outbreak in Germany , 2020 .

[29]  Anna Kende,et al.  We Only Believe in News That We Doctored Ourselves , 2020 .

[30]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Citizens Versus the Internet: Confronting Digital Challenges With Cognitive Tools , 2019, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[31]  C. Betsch,et al.  COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO Germany) - Wave 5 , 2020 .

[32]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Wie informiert sich die Bevölkerung in Deutschland rund um das Coronavirus? Umfrage zu vorherrschenden Themen und Gründen, dem Umgang mit Fehlinformationen, sowie der Risikowahrnehmung und dem Wissen der Bevölkerung rund um das Coronavirus , 2020 .

[33]  L. Rinsdorf,et al.  Kapitel 2: Jenseits der Fakten: Deutschsprachige Fake News aus Sicht der Journalistik , 2020, Desinformation aufdecken und bekämpfen.

[34]  Edson C. Tandoc The facts of fake news: A research review , 2019, Sociology Compass.

[35]  Anne Schulz,et al.  Alternative media for a populist audience? Exploring political and media use predictors of exposure to Breitbart, Sputnik, and Co. , 2019, Information, Communication & Society.

[36]  David G. Rand,et al.  Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning , 2019, Cognition.

[37]  L. Frischlich,et al.  Key Dimensions of Alternative News Media , 2019, Digital Journalism.

[38]  S. Lecheler,et al.  Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: a framework and research agenda , 2019, Annals of the International Communication Association.

[39]  F. Arendt,et al.  Fake News, Warnhinweise und perzipierter Wahrheitsgehalt: Zur unterschiedlichen Anfälligkeit für Falschmeldungen in Abhängigkeit von der politischen Orientierung , 2019, Publizistik.

[40]  Rachel R. Mourão,et al.  Fake News as Discursive Integration: An Analysis of Sites That Publish False, Misleading, Hyperpartisan and Sensational Information , 2019, Journalism Studies.

[41]  Katrin Hartwig,et al.  Fake News Perception in Germany: A Representative Study of People's Attitudes and Approaches to Counteract Disinformation , 2019, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[42]  J. V. Van Bavel,et al.  Identity concerns drive belief: The impact of partisan identity on the belief and dissemination of true and false news , 2018, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.

[43]  C. Betsch,et al.  Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination , 2018, PloS one.

[44]  Joshua A. Tucker,et al.  Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature , 2018 .

[45]  Edson C. Tandoc,et al.  Defining “Fake News” , 2018 .

[46]  Sam Wineburg,et al.  Lateral Reading: Reading Less and Learning More When Evaluating Digital Information , 2017 .

[47]  Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al.  brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan , 2017 .

[48]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Nudging and Boosting: Steering or Empowering Good Decisions , 2017, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[49]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations , 2017, Memory studies.

[50]  D. Kahan The Psychology of Fake News , 2017 .

[51]  Rasmus Kleis Nielsen,et al.  "News you don't believe": Audience perspectives on fake news , 2017 .

[52]  Joanne M. Miller,et al.  Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust , 2016 .

[53]  Xiaoxia Cao,et al.  The Impact of Exposure to Media Messages Promoting Government Conspiracy Theories on Distrust in the Government: Evidence from a Two-Stage Randomized Experiment , 2016 .

[54]  Jan-Willem van Prooijen,et al.  The Influence of Control on Belief in Conspiracy Theories: Conceptual and Applied Extensions , 2015 .

[55]  Martin Kulldorff,et al.  Geographic Clusters in Underimmunization and Vaccine Refusal , 2015, Pediatrics.

[56]  M. Kulldorff,et al.  Geographic Clusters in Underimmunization and Vaccine , 2015 .

[57]  Joseph M. Parent,et al.  American Conspiracy Theories , 2014 .

[58]  P. V. van Lange,et al.  The social dimension of belief in conspiracy theories , 2014 .

[59]  P. V. Lange,et al.  Power, politics, and paranoia : why people are suspicious of their leaders , 2014 .

[60]  Christopher C. French,et al.  Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[61]  Martin Voracek,et al.  Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[62]  D. Dunning The Dunning–Kruger Effect: On Being Ignorant of One’s Own Ignorance , 2011 .

[63]  Ted Goertzel,et al.  Belief in Conspiracy Theories , 1994 .

[64]  W. Davison The Third-Person Effect in Communication , 1983 .