Comprehensive Analysis of the SUL1 Promoter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, beneficial mutations selected during sulfate-limited growth are typically amplifications of the SUL1 gene, which encodes the high-affinity sulfate transporter, resulting in fitness increases of >35% . Cis-regulatory mutations have not been observed at this locus; however, it is not clear whether this absence is due to a low mutation rate such that these mutations do not arise, or they arise but have limited fitness effects relative to those of amplification. To address this question directly, we assayed the fitness effects of nearly all possible point mutations in a 493-base segment of the gene’s promoter through mutagenesis and selection. While most mutations were either neutral or detrimental during sulfate-limited growth, eight mutations increased fitness >5% and as much as 9.4%. Combinations of these beneficial mutations increased fitness only up to 11%. Thus, in the case of SUL1, promoter mutations could not induce a fitness increase similar to that of gene amplification. Using these data, we identified functionally important regions of the SUL1 promoter and analyzed three sites that correspond to potential binding sites for the transcription factors Met32 and Cbf1. Mutations that create new Met32- or Cbf1-binding sites also increased fitness. Some mutations in the untranslated region of the SUL1 transcript decreased fitness, likely due to the formation of inhibitory upstream open reading frames. Our methodology—saturation mutagenesis, chemostat selection, and DNA sequencing to track variants—should be a broadly applicable approach.

[1]  Maitreya J. Dunham,et al.  Empirical determinants of adaptive mutations in yeast experimental evolution , 2015, bioRxiv.

[2]  David J. Galas,et al.  An Evaluation of High-Throughput Approaches to QTL Mapping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2013, Genetics.

[3]  Maitreya J. Dunham,et al.  The Dynamics of Diverse Segmental Amplifications in Populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Adapting to Strong Selection , 2013, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[4]  Catarina Costa,et al.  The YEASTRACT database: an upgraded information system for the analysis of gene and genomic transcription regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  Joseph B Hiatt,et al.  Activity-enhancing mutations in an E3 ubiquitin ligase identified by high-throughput mutagenesis , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Maitreya J. Dunham,et al.  Design and Use of Multiplexed Chemostat Arrays , 2013, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[7]  Hal S Alper,et al.  Characterization of plasmid burden and copy number in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for optimization of metabolic engineering applications. , 2013, FEMS yeast research.

[8]  Y. Pilpel,et al.  Chromosomal duplication is a transient evolutionary solution to stress , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Barak A. Cohen,et al.  Complex effects of nucleotide variants in a mammalian cis-regulatory element , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  David Botstein,et al.  Combinatorial control of diverse metabolic and physiological functions by transcriptional regulators of the yeast sulfur assimilation pathway , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[11]  David Botstein,et al.  Perturbation-based analysis and modeling of combinatorial regulation in the yeast sulfur assimilation pathway , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[12]  R. Mitra,et al.  A systematic study of gene expression variation at single-nucleotide resolution reveals widespread regulatory roles for uAUGs , 2012, Genome research.

[13]  M. Tyers,et al.  Characterizing the roles of Met31 and Met32 in coordinating Met4-activated transcription in the absence of Met30 , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[14]  Joseph B Hiatt,et al.  Massively parallel functional dissection of mammalian enhancers in vivo , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  P. Wittkopp,et al.  Contrasting Properties of Gene-Specific Regulatory, Coding, and Copy Number Mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Frequency, Effects, and Dominance , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[16]  B. Pugh,et al.  Genome-wide structure and organization of eukaryotic pre-initiation complexes , 2011, Nature.

[17]  Martha L Bulyk,et al.  Non-DNA-binding cofactors enhance DNA-binding specificity of a transcriptional regulatory complex , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[18]  Timothy R. Hughes,et al.  YeTFaSCo: a database of evaluated yeast transcription factor sequence specificities , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  Daniel A. Skelly,et al.  A powerful and flexible statistical framework for testing hypotheses of allele-specific gene expression from RNA-seq data. , 2011, Genome research.

[20]  Mark Johnston,et al.  Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif , 2011, Bioinform..

[22]  Robert A. Edwards,et al.  Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets , 2011, Bioinform..

[23]  Alexandre P. Francisco,et al.  YEASTRACT: providing a programmatic access to curated transcriptional regulatory associations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through a web services interface , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  L. Kuras,et al.  Transcriptional plasticity through differential assembly of a multiprotein activation complex , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  Mike Tyers,et al.  Dissection of Combinatorial Control by the Met4 Transcriptional Complex , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.

[26]  Jay Shendure,et al.  Parallel, tag-directed assembly of locally derived short sequence reads , 2010, Nature Methods.

[27]  Daniel A. Skelly,et al.  Inherited variation in gene expression. , 2009, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[28]  Naama Barkai,et al.  A Yeast Hybrid Provides Insight into the Evolution of Gene Expression Regulation , 2009, Science.

[29]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Global mapping of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by digital genomic footprinting , 2009, Nature Methods.

[30]  David Botstein,et al.  The Repertoire and Dynamics of Evolutionary Adaptations to Controlled Nutrient-Limited Environments in Yeast , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[31]  David L Stern,et al.  The Loci of Evolution: How Predictable is Genetic Evolution? , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  M. Gerstein,et al.  The Transcriptional Landscape of the Yeast Genome Defined by RNA Sequencing , 2008, Science.

[33]  Peter Kaiser,et al.  A Dominant Suppressor Mutation of the met30 Cell Cycle Defect Suggests Regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Met4-Cbf1 Transcription Complex by Met32* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  Alexandre P. Francisco,et al.  YEASTRACT-DISCOVERER: new tools to improve the analysis of transcriptional regulatory associations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[35]  J. Coyne,et al.  THE LOCUS OF EVOLUTION: EVO DEVO AND THE GENETICS OF ADAPTATION , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  G. Wray The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[37]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Quantifying similarity between motifs , 2007, Genome Biology.

[38]  S. Quake,et al.  A Systems Approach to Measuring the Binding Energy Landscapes of Transcription Factors , 2007, Science.

[39]  Ting Wang,et al.  An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[40]  Peter Uetz,et al.  Transcriptional activators in yeast , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  Pooja Jain,et al.  The YEASTRACT database: a tool for the analysis of transcription regulatory associations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[42]  A. Tong,et al.  Systematic yeast synthetic lethal and synthetic dosage lethal screens identify genes required for chromosome segregation. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Leonid Kruglyak,et al.  Local Regulatory Variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2005, PLoS genetics.

[44]  B. Pugh,et al.  Identification and Distinct Regulation of Yeast TATA Box-Containing Genes , 2004, Cell.

[45]  B. Birren,et al.  Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements , 2003, Nature.

[46]  J. Roth,et al.  Amplification–mutagenesis: Evidence that “directed” adaptive mutation and general hypermutability result from growth with a selected gene amplification , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  D. Morris,et al.  Upstream Open Reading Frames as Regulators of mRNA Translation , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[48]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  SCPD: a promoter database of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Bioinform..

[49]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Genetic instabilities in human cancers , 1998, Nature.

[50]  L. Breeden,et al.  Xbp1, a stress-induced transcriptional repressor of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Swi4/Mbp1 family , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[51]  P. Blaiseau,et al.  Met31p and Met32p, two related zinc finger proteins, are involved in transcriptional regulation of yeast sulfur amino acid metabolism , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[52]  V. Beneš,et al.  Molecular characterization of two high affinity sulfate transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Genetics.

[53]  F. W. Smith,et al.  Isolation of a cDNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae that encodes a high affinity sulphate transporter at the plasma membrane , 1995, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[54]  O. Brison,et al.  Gene amplification and tumor progression. , 1993, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[55]  S. Dowell,et al.  The centromere and promoter factor 1 of yeast contains a dimerisation domain located carboxy-terminal to the bHLH domain. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[56]  D. Botstein,et al.  Construction and genetic characterization of temperature-sensitive mutant alleles of the yeast actin gene. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  M. King,et al.  Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. , 1975, Science.

[58]  R. Schiestl,et al.  High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[59]  K. Struhl Molecular mechanisms of transcriptional regulation in yeast. , 1990, Annual review of biochemistry.