Support vector machine model for diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer with multidetector computed tomography: a preliminary study

BackgroundLymph node metastasis (LNM) of gastric cancer is an important prognostic factor regarding long-term survival. But several imaging techniques which are commonly used in stomach cannot satisfactorily assess the gastric cancer lymph node status. They can not achieve both high sensitivity and specificity. As a kind of machine-learning methods, Support Vector Machine has the potential to solve this complex issue.MethodsThe institutional review board approved this retrospective study. 175 consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent MDCT before surgery were included. We evaluated the tumor and lymph node indicators on CT images including serosal invasion, tumor classification, tumor maximum diameter, number of lymph nodes, maximum lymph node size and lymph nodes station, which reflected the biological behavior of gastric cancer. Univariate analysis was used to analyze the relationship between the six image indicators with LNM. A SVM model was built with these indicators above as input index. The output index was that lymph node metastasis of the patient was positive or negative. It was confirmed by the surgery and histopathology. A standard machine-learning technique called k-fold cross-validation (5-fold in our study) was used to train and test SVM models. We evaluated the diagnostic capability of the SVM models in lymph node metastasis with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. And the radiologist classified the lymph node metastasis of patients by using maximum lymph node size on CT images as criterion. We compared the areas under ROC curves (AUC) of the radiologist and SVM models.ResultsIn 175 cases, the cases of lymph node metastasis were 134 and 41 cases were not. The six image indicators all had statistically significant differences between the LNM negative and positive groups. The means of the sensitivity, specificity and AUC of SVM models with 5-fold cross-validation were 88.5%, 78.5% and 0.876, respectively. While the diagnostic power of the radiologist classifying lymph node metastasis by maximum lymph node size were only 63.4%, 75.6% and 0.757. Each SVM model of the 5-fold cross-validation performed significantly better than the radiologist.ConclusionsBased on biological behavior information of gastric cancer on MDCT images, SVM model can help diagnose the lymph node metastasis preoperatively.

[1]  H. Honda,et al.  Lymph-node metastases: efficacy for detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer. , 1995, Radiology.

[2]  Kyle A. McQuisten,et al.  Comparing Artificial Neural Networks, General Linear Models and Support Vector Machines in Building Predictive Models for Small Interfering RNAs , 2009, PloS one.

[3]  T. Kwee,et al.  Imaging in assessing lymph node status in gastric cancer , 2009, Gastric Cancer.

[4]  Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma – 2nd English Edition – , 1998, Gastric Cancer.

[5]  Chang-ming Huang,et al.  Surgical treatment and prognosis of gastric cancer in 2,613 patients. , 2004, World journal of gastroenterology.

[6]  H. Ha,et al.  Gastric cancer by multidetector row CT: preoperative staging , 2005, Abdominal Imaging.

[7]  Farid E Ahmed,et al.  Molecular Cancer BioMed Central Review , 2005 .

[8]  M B Alpern,et al.  Abdominal lymphadenopathy in benign diseases: CT detection. , 1987, Radiology.

[9]  Yi Fang,et al.  [Multivariate analysis of risk factors of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer]. , 2009, Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery.

[10]  Sung Il Hwang,et al.  Image-based clinical decision support for transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of multiple logistic regression, artificial neural network, and support vector machine , 2009, European Radiology.

[11]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Predicting variations of perceptual performance across individuals from neural activity using pattern classifiers , 2010, NeuroImage.

[12]  Muin J. Khoury,et al.  Application of support vector machine modeling for prediction of common diseases: the case of diabetes and pre-diabetes , 2010, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[13]  B. Gross,et al.  Upper abdominal lymph nodes: criteria for normal size determined with CT. , 1991, Radiology.

[14]  Jung‐Ta Chen,et al.  Lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer: a clinicopathological analysis. , 2002, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[15]  Mehtap Tunaci,et al.  Carcinoma of stomach and duodenum: radiologic diagnosis and staging. , 2002, European journal of radiology.

[16]  Youping Deng,et al.  SVM Classifier – a comprehensive java interface for support vector machine classification of microarray data , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[17]  Keiichi Maruyama,et al.  Artificial Neural Network for Prediction of Lymph Node Metastases in Gastric Cancer: a Phase Ii Diagnostic Study , 2003 .

[18]  Clifford R. Jack,et al.  Accuracy of Dementia Diagnosis: A Direct Comparison of Radiologists and a Computerized Method , 2009 .

[19]  Tomohiro Nishina,et al.  Predictive Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Undifferentiated Early Gastric Cancers , 2006, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[20]  Carlo Catalano,et al.  T staging of gastric cancer: role of multi-detector row CT. , 2005, Radiology.

[21]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Accuracy of dementia diagnosis—a direct comparison between radiologists and a computerized method , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  Yiming Huang,et al.  Clinicopathological features associated with lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer: analysis of a single-institution experience in China. , 2009, Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie.

[23]  G. Liu,et al.  Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT--correlation with surgical and histopathologic results. , 2007, Radiology.

[24]  Jigneshkumar L Patel,et al.  Applications of artificial neural networks in medical science. , 2007, Current clinical pharmacology.

[25]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[26]  Janaina Mourão Miranda,et al.  Classifying brain states and determining the discriminating activation patterns: Support Vector Machine on functional MRI data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[27]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Support vector machine applications in bioinformatics. , 2003, Applied bioinformatics.