Contextual influences on interactive processing: Effects of discriminability, quantity, and uncertainty

Three contextual factors—(1) the discriminability of stimuli in pitch, (2) the number of stimuli differing in pitch, and (3)the uncertainty regarding which stimuli or tasks would appear—were manipulated as subjects performed speeded loudness classifications in each of six experiments. The magnitude of Garner interference and effects of congruity were used to gauge the degree of interactive processing. Enhancing pitch discriminability caused monotonic increases in interference and congruity. Stimulus-task uncertainty mediated the changes in Garner interference wrought by increased discriminability. Uncertainty also caused a surprising shift in congruity from strongly positive to strongly negative as uncertainty grew. Increasing stimulus quantity lowered interference, but had inconsistent effects on congruity. Regression analyses suggested that, collectively, these three contextual variables underlie most failures of selective attention in speeded classification.

[1]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  Response system processes in absolute judgment , 1971 .

[2]  Michael A. Zagorski,et al.  Perceptual independence of pitch and loudness in a signal detection experiment: A processing model for 2ATFC (21FC) experiments , 1975 .

[3]  C. F. Foard,et al.  Holistic and analytic modes of processing: the multiple determinants of perceptual analysis. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  G R Lockhead,et al.  Psychophysical scaling: Judgments of attributes or objects? , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  Gary L. Felfoldy Repetition effects in choice reaction time to multidimensional stimuli , 1974 .

[6]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[7]  F Gravetter,et al.  Criterial range as a frame of reference for stimulus judgment. , 1973, Psychological review.

[8]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Overall similarity in adults' classification: The child in all of us. , 1984 .

[9]  Daniel Algom,et al.  Range and regression, loudness scales, and loudness processing: toward a context-bound psychophysics. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  L. Marks,et al.  Slippery context effect and critical bands. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  L E Marks,et al.  Magnitude estimation and sensory matching , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[13]  S. Carey,et al.  Anatomy of a stimulus domain: The relation between multidimensional and unidimensional scaling of noise bands , 1975 .

[14]  H. Helson Adaptation-level theory : an experimental and systematic approach to behavior , 1964 .

[15]  L. Marks,et al.  Hard andsoft interacting dimensions: Differential effects of dual context on classification , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  T Carvellas,et al.  Direct estimation of multidimensional tonal dissimilarity. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Richard D. Wright Amiga 1000 hardware timing and reaction-time key interfacing , 1986 .

[18]  L E Marks,et al.  The slippery context effect in psychophysics: Intensive, extensive, and qualitative continua , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  W. Todd Maddox,et al.  Perceptual and decisional separability. , 1992 .

[21]  T. Marill Detection theory and psychophysics , 1956 .

[22]  G. Lockhead,et al.  Sequential effects in absolute judgments of loudness , 1968 .

[23]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  G. M. Redding,et al.  Processing line location and orientation. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  N. Perrin,et al.  Varieties of perceptual independence. , 1986, Psychological review.

[26]  L E Marks,et al.  Perceptual primacy of dimensions: support for a model of dimensional interaction. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  S. Parker,et al.  Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments? , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  L. Marks,et al.  Optional processes in similarity judgments , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Response competition effects insame-different judgments , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  James R. Pomerantz,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – Visual Form Perception: An Overview* , 1986 .