Managing metadata: Networks of practice, technological frames, and metadata work in a digital library

The organizations that develop information systems are usually composed of members and groups with different technological backgrounds and experiences. While these different backgrounds are necessary to support the many dimensions of information system development, at the same time they can result in barriers to sharing organizational knowledge, and can thus impede this work. Understanding how the technological backgrounds of organizational groups are constituted and mediated thus provides useful insight into how information system development occurs in organizational contexts. This article contributes to this discussion with a qualitative and interpretive case study of a small team engaged in creating metadata for a digital library. A number of unexpected and recalcitrant problems were encountered that delayed this metadata work. Drawing on theories of networks of practice, technological frames, and perspective making and perspective taking, the article uses ethnographic- and action research-based interviews, to probe project members' understanding of metadata. The analysis identified different networks of practice and technological frames in the project, including the IT workers, who had a systems administration perspective, and the faculty members, who had a theoretical research perspective. The tensions caused by these differences are described, as are the ways in which the project resolved them. Two findings are that the intercommunal negotiation was established not just between individual networks of practice in the project, but with reference to an emerging community of practice that served as a boundary object, and that intercommunal negotiation also had to be carried out diachronically across time, with this latter form of negotiation being difficult to achieve.

[1]  S. Barley,et al.  Occupational Communities: Culture and Control in Organizations , 1982 .

[2]  Matthew S. Mayernik,et al.  How institutional factors influence the creation of scientific metadata , 2011, iConference '11.

[3]  Paul Duguid The Art of Knowing , 2012 .

[4]  Gobinda G. Chowdhury,et al.  Large-Scale Impact of Digital Library Services: Findings from a Major Evaluation of SCRAN , 2006, ECDL.

[5]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  Usability of a metadata creation application for resource authors , 2005 .

[6]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[7]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Cory P. Knobel,et al.  Understanding Infrastructure: Dynamics, Tensions, and Design , 2007 .

[9]  Andrew Waugh Specifying Metadata Standards for Metadata Tool Configuration , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[10]  Rich Gazan Metadata as a realm of translation: Merging knowledge domains in the design of an environmental information system , 2003 .

[11]  Michael Khoo,et al.  Merging metadata: a sociotechnical study of crosswalking and interoperability , 2010, JCDL '10.

[12]  J. Bruner Acts of meaning , 1990 .

[13]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[14]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[15]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams , 2007, MIS Q..

[17]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[18]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[19]  E. Davidson A Technological Frames Perspective on Information Technology and Organizational Change , 2006 .

[20]  Carl Lagoze,et al.  A research agenda for data curation cyberinfrastructure , 2011, JCDL '11.

[21]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Between meaning and machine: Learning to represent the knowledge of communities , 2009, Inf. Organ..

[22]  Yutaka Yamauchi,et al.  Local assimilation of an enterprise system: Situated learning by means of familiarity pockets , 2010, Inf. Organ..

[23]  Geoffrey C. Fox Data and metadata on the semantic Grid , 2003, Comput. Sci. Eng..

[24]  Heiko Schuldt,et al.  The Delos digital library reference model : foundations for digital libraries , 2007 .

[25]  Peter Kawalek,et al.  Information systems and partnership in multi-agency networks: an action research project in crime reduction , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[26]  Carl Lagoze,et al.  Metadata aggregation and "automated digital libraries": a retrospective on the NSDL experience , 2006, Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL '06).

[27]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[28]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Transcending Knowledge Differences in Cross-Functional Teams , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[29]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[30]  Beth A. Bechky Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[31]  Douglas Tudhope,et al.  Towards Digital Repository Interoperability: The Document Indexing and Semantic Tagging Interface for Libraries (DISTIL) , 2012, TPDL.

[32]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[33]  Michel Avital,et al.  Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[34]  Daniel Atkins,et al.  Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure , 2003 .

[35]  A. Salter,et al.  Postcards from the Edge: Local Communities, Global Programs and Boundary Objects , 2004 .

[36]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society , 1984 .

[37]  B. Schutt Sorting things out. , 1970, The American journal of nursing.

[38]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  "I am kind of a nomad where I have to go places and places"… Understanding mobility, place and identity in global software work from India , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[39]  William E. Moen,et al.  Learning from artifacts: metadata utilization analysis , 2006, Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL '06).

[40]  A. Giddens The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[41]  Fatma Nasoz,et al.  A User-Centric Metadata Creation Tool for Preserving the Nation's Ecological Data , 2011, HCI.

[42]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences , 2009 .

[43]  Michael Khoo,et al.  'Erasmus': an organization- and user-centered dublin core metadata tool , 2012, JCDL '12.

[44]  C. Calhoun Dictionary of the social sciences , 2002 .

[45]  Tamara Sumner,et al.  Functional Requirements for Online Tools to Support Community-Led Collections Building , 2002, ECDL.

[46]  Helena Karsten,et al.  User interpretations of future information system use: A snapshot with technological frames , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[47]  Besiki Stvilia,et al.  Is 'Quality' Metadata 'Shareable' Metadata? The Implications of Local Metadata Practice on Federated Collections , 2005 .

[48]  Michael Khoo,et al.  Tacit user and developer frames in user-led collection development: the case of the digital water education library , 2005, Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL '05).

[49]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[50]  T. Kuhn The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[51]  Carolyn M. Hall,et al.  Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science , 1971 .

[52]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  A Concern for Engaged Scholarship: The challenges for action research projects , 2009, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Digital libraries , 1995, CACM.

[54]  Mary S. Woodley Crosswalks, metadata harvesting, federated searching, metasearching: using metadata to connect users and information , 2008 .

[55]  Amanda J. Wilson,et al.  Toward Releasing the Metadata Bottleneck , 2007 .

[56]  C. Borgman Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet , 2007 .

[57]  Christian Hicks,et al.  How political processes shaped the IT adopted by a small make-to-order company: a case study in the insulated wire and cable industry , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[58]  Sarah Currier,et al.  Building Quality Assurance into Metadata Creation: An Analysis based on the Learning Objects and e-Prints Communities of Practice , 2003, Dublin Core Conference.

[59]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[60]  Jewel Ward A quantitative analysis of unqualified Dublin Core Metadata Element Set usage within data providers registered with the Open Archives Initiative , 2003, 2003 Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 2003. Proceedings..

[61]  Christine L Borgman,et al.  Science friction: Data, metadata, and collaboration , 2011, Social studies of science.

[62]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[63]  Diana G. Oblinger,et al.  Fostering Learning in the Networked World: The Cyberlearning Opportunity and Challenge. A 21st Century Agenda for the National Science Foundation , 2008 .

[64]  Jung-ran Park,et al.  Dublin Core metadata semantics: an analysis of the perspectives of information professionals , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[65]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Grounded action research: a method for understanding IT in practice , 1999 .

[66]  Thomas P. Hughes,et al.  Networks Of Power , 1983 .

[67]  Peter J. Thorburn,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Guiding the Participatory Development of Agricultural Decision Support Systems , 2010 .

[68]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Negotiating "best practices" in package software implementation , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[69]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Style Composition in Action Research Publication , 2012, MIS Q..

[70]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[71]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  Iterative Design of Metadata Creation Tools for Resource Authors , 2003, Dublin Core Conference.

[72]  Jeffrey Beall,et al.  Metadata and Data Quality Problems in the Digital Library , 2005, J. Digit. Inf..

[73]  Peter Just,et al.  Social and cultural anthropology , 2000 .

[74]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[75]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[76]  D. Wellman,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[77]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[78]  A. Stinchcombe Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[79]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[80]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[81]  Paul Duguid,et al.  “The Art of Knowing”: Social and Tacit Dimensions of Knowledge and the Limits of the Community of Practice , 2005, Inf. Soc..

[82]  Stephen Jackson,et al.  Organizational culture and information systems adoption: A three-perspective approach , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[83]  D. Slater,et al.  Ethnographic Action Research: A User’s Handbook , 2003 .

[84]  W. Bijker The social construction of bakelite: toward a theory of invention , 1987 .

[85]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  Metadata and Digital Information , 2010 .

[86]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[87]  Timo Hartmann,et al.  Implementing information systems with project teams using ethnographic-action research , 2009, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[88]  Diane I. Hillmann,et al.  The Continuum of Metadata Quality: Defining, Expressing, Exploiting , 2004 .