The effects of roadside structures on the transport and dispersion of ultrafine particles from highways

Abstract Understanding local-scale transport and dispersion of pollutants emitted from traffic sources is important for urban planning and air quality assessments. Predicting pollutant concentration patterns in complex environments depends on accurate representations of local features (e.g., noise barriers, trees, buildings) affecting near-field air flows. This study examined the effects of roadside barriers on the flow patterns and dispersion of pollutants from a high-traffic highway in Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. The effects of the structures were analyzed using the Quick Urban & Industrial Complex (QUIC) model, an empirically based diagnostic tool which simulates fine-scale wind field and dispersion patterns around obstacles. Model simulations were compared with the spatial distributions of ultrafine particles (UFP) from vehicular emissions measured using a passenger van equipped with a Differential Mobility Analyzer/Condensation Particle Counter. The field site allowed for an evaluation of pollutant concentrations in open terrain, with a noise barrier present near the road, and with a noise barrier and vegetation present near the road. Results indicated that air pollutant concentrations near the road were generally higher in open terrain situations with no barriers present; however, concentrations for this case decreased faster with distance than when roadside barriers were present. The presence of a noise barrier and vegetation resulted in the lowest downwind pollutant concentrations, indicating that the plume under this condition was relatively uniform and vertically well-mixed. Comparison of the QUIC model with the mobile UFP measurements indicated that QUIC reasonably represented pollutant transport and dispersion for each of the study configurations.

[1]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Nanoparticle emissions on Minnesota highways , 2004 .

[2]  Mukesh Khare,et al.  Line source emission modelling , 2002 .

[3]  M. J. Brown,et al.  Testing of a far-wake parameterization for a fast response urban wind model , 2006 .

[4]  Norbert Kalthoff,et al.  Vehicle-induced turbulence near a motorway , 2005 .

[5]  Ken Nelson,et al.  Light-Duty Motor Vehicle Exhaust Particulate Matter Measurement in the Denver, Colorado, Area. , 1999, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[6]  D. Hall,et al.  Economics of ecosystems management , 1985, Tasks for vegetation science.

[7]  Paul E Benson,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF THE CALINE3 AND 4 MODELS , 1992 .

[8]  Kiros Berhane,et al.  Traffic, Susceptibility, and Childhood Asthma , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[9]  Thomas D Durbin,et al.  Population Density, Particulate Emission Characterization, and Impact on the Particulate Inventory of Smoking Vehicles in the South Coast Air Quality Management District. , 1999, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[10]  Gilles Bergametti,et al.  Modeling Flow Patterns in a Small Vegetated Area in the Northern Chihuahuan Desert using QUIC (Quick Urban & Industrial Complex) , 2006 .

[11]  Rodney J. Weber,et al.  A Particle-into-Liquid Collector for Rapid Measurement of Aerosol Bulk Chemical Composition , 2001 .

[12]  M. J. Brown,et al.  Improved velocity deficit parameterizations for a fast response urban wind model , 2004 .

[13]  Michael J. Kleeman,et al.  SIZE AND COMPOSITION DISTRIBUTION OF FINE PARTICULATE MATTER EMITTED FROM MOTOR VEHICLES , 2000 .

[14]  R. Burnett,et al.  Spatial Analysis of Air Pollution and Mortality in Los Angeles , 2005, Epidemiology.

[15]  David K. Heist,et al.  Sand Flux Simulations at a Small Scale over a Heterogeneous Mesquite Area of the Northern Chihuahuan Desert , 2007 .

[16]  N. Lepp,et al.  ROADSIDE VEGETATION: AN EFFICIENT BARRIER TO THE LATERAL SPREAD OF ATMOSPHERIC LEAD? , 1977 .

[17]  Werner Brilon,et al.  Wind tunnel experiments on micro-scale dispersion of exhausts from motorways , 1993 .

[18]  Yilin Ma,et al.  An on-line instrument for mobile measurements of the spatial variability of hexavalent and trivalent chromium in urban air , 2006 .

[19]  Howard Wachtel,et al.  Distance-Weighted Traffic Density in Proximity to a Home Is a Risk Factor for Leukemia and Other Childhood Cancers , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[20]  C. S. B. Grimmond,et al.  Aerodynamic Roughness of Urban Areas Derived from Wind Observations , 1998, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[21]  Timothy J Buckley,et al.  The Mobile Source Effect on Curbside 1,3-Butadiene, Benzene, and Particle-Bound Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Assessed at a Tollbooth , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[22]  Beate Ritz,et al.  Residential proximity to traffic and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles county, California, 1994-1996. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  Eric R. Pardyjak,et al.  Evaluation of the QUIC urban dispersion model using the Salt Lake City URBAN 2000 tracer experiment data - IOP 10 , 2006 .

[24]  Richard C. Flagan,et al.  Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer , 1989 .

[25]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Study of ultrafine particles near a major highway with heavy-duty diesel traffic , 2002 .

[26]  A. Peters,et al.  Exposure to traffic and the onset of myocardial infarction. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  W. Godwin Article in Press , 2000 .

[28]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Concentration and Size Distribution of Ultrafine Particles Near a Major Highway , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.