Perceptual normalization of vowels produced by sinusoidal voices.

When listeners hear a sinusoidal replica of a sentence, they perceive linguistic properties despite the absence of short-time acoustic components typical of vocal signals. Is this accomplished by a postperceptual strategy that accommodates the anomalous acoustic pattern ad hoc, or is a sinusoidal sentence understood by the ordinary means of speech perception? If listeners treat sinusoidal signals as speech signals however unlike speech they may be, then perception should exhibit the commonplace sensitivity to the dimensions of the originating vocal tract. The present study, employing sinusoidal signals, raised this issue by testing the identification of target /bVt/, or b-vowel-t, syllables occurring in sentences that differed in the range of frequency variation of their component tones. Vowel quality of target syllables was influenced by this acoustic correlate of vocal-tract scale, implying that the perception of these nonvocal signals includes a process of vocal-tract scale, implying that the perception of these nonvocal signals includes a process of vocal-tract normalization. Converging evidence suggests that the perception of sinusoidal vowels depends on the relation among component tones and not on the phonetic likeness of each tone in isolation. The findings support the general claim that sinusoidal replicas of natural speech signals are perceptible phonetically because they preserve time-varying information present in natural signals.

[1]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Speech perception: a model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical access , 1979 .

[2]  P. Kuhl Speech perception in early infancy: perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimilar vowel categories. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Two left-hemisphere mechanisms in speech perception , 1974 .

[4]  E. E. David,et al.  Human communication : a unified view , 1972 .

[5]  A. Fourcin,et al.  Speech source inference , 1968 .

[6]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Acoustic memory and the perception of speech , 1974 .

[7]  L. Gerstman Classification of self-normalized vowels , 1968 .

[8]  J. Lackner,et al.  The Psychological Representation of Speech Sounds , 1975, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  What information enables a listener to map a talker's vowel space? , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  John E. Markel,et al.  Linear Prediction of Speech , 1976, Communication and Cybernetics.

[11]  C. Fant,et al.  Descriptive analysis of the acoustic aspects of speech. , 1962, Logos.

[12]  M. E. H. Schouten,et al.  The psychophysics of speech perception , 1987 .

[13]  S. F. Disner Evaluation of vowel normalization procedures. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  H. Wakita Normalization of vowels by vocal-tract length and its application to vowel identification , 1977 .

[15]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .

[16]  Wayne A. Lea,et al.  Trends in Speech Recognition , 1980 .

[17]  A shift in formant frequencies is not the same as a shift in the center of gravity of a multiformant energy concentration , 1985 .

[18]  Harvey M. Sussman,et al.  A neuronal model of vowel normalization and representation , 1986, Brain and Language.

[19]  N. Lass Contemporary Issues in Experimental Phonetics , 1976 .

[20]  E. Boring Sensation and Perception. (Scientific Books: Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology) , 1943 .

[21]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Frontiers of speech communication research , 1979 .

[22]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Judging sine wave stimuli as speech and as nonspeech , 1983 .

[23]  E. Boring Sensation and Perception. (Scientific Books: Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology) , 1943 .

[24]  H. S. Gopal,et al.  A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  H Hollien,et al.  Some Contextual Effects on the Perception of Synthetic Vowels , 1970, Language and speech.

[26]  Herbert L. Pick,et al.  Perception and experience , 1978 .

[27]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Identification of vowels in “vowelless” syllables , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  G. J. Rich,et al.  A Preliminary Study of Vowel Qualities , 1915 .

[29]  P E Rubin,et al.  On the perception of intonation from sinusoidal sentences , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  Fant Cg Descriptive analysis of the acoustic aspects of speech. , 1962 .

[31]  P. Ladefoged Three areas of experimental phonetics , 1967 .

[32]  Peter Ladefoged,et al.  Three areas of experimental phonetics : stress and respiratory activity, the nature of vowel quality, units in the perception and production of speech , 1967 .

[33]  R. Aslin,et al.  Identification of vowels in “vowelless” syllables by 3-year-olds , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Some experiments on perceptual learning of mirror-image acoustic patterns , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  P. Ladefoged WHAT ARE LINGUISTIC SOUNDS MADE OF , 1980 .

[36]  Philip Lieberman,et al.  The Biology and Evolution of Language , 1984 .

[37]  K. Suomi,et al.  On talker and phoneme information conveyed by vowels: A whole spectrum approach to the normalization problem , 1984, Speech Commun..

[38]  D. O'Shaughnessy,et al.  Speaker recognition , 1986, IEEE ASSP Magazine.

[39]  A. Liberman,et al.  Acoustic Loci and Transitional Cues for Consonants , 1954 .

[40]  T. C. Rand Vocal Tract Size Normalization in the Perception of Stop Consonants , 1971 .

[41]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  A note on vocal tract size factors and non-uniform f-pattern scalings , 1966 .

[42]  The Vocality of Fork, Violin and Piano Tones , 1920 .

[43]  W. Köhler Akustische Untersuchungen. II , 1910 .

[44]  J. Perkell,et al.  Invariance and variability in speech processes , 1987 .

[45]  D. Massaro Preperceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception. , 1972, Psychological review.

[46]  Robert E. Remez,et al.  Units of Organization and Analysis in the Perception of Speech , 1987 .

[47]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Acoustic analysis and synthesis of speech with applications to Swedish , 1959 .

[48]  Alvin M. Liberman,et al.  The Grammars of Speech and Language. , 1970 .

[49]  A G Samuel,et al.  Phonetic prototypes , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Prediction of perceived phonetic distance from critical-band spectra: A first step , 1982, ICASSP.

[51]  Peter D. Eimas,et al.  Effects of Selective Adaptation on the Perception of Speech and Visual Patterns: Evidence for Feature Detectors , 1978 .

[52]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[53]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues. , 1981, Science.

[54]  T. M. Nearey Phonetic feature systems for vowels , 1978 .