A formative analysis of individual differences in the effectiveness of learning objects in secondary school

The purpose of this study was to examine individual differences in the effectiveness of learning objects in secondary school classrooms. Specifically, gender, age, grade, subject area, and computer comfort (self-efficacy) were examined in 850 students. Effectiveness was measured in terms of student attitude (learning, quality, and engagement) and student performance. No gender differences were observed between males and females with respect to student attitudes or performance. Age was significantly correlated with student attitudes and performance, however correlation coefficients were small. Grade 12 students were more positive about learning objects and performed better than grade 9 and 10 students. Science students had significantly more positive attitudes and performed better than mathematics students. Finally, students who were more comfortable about computers, appreciated learning objects more than their less confident peers, however performance was unaffected.

[1]  Elizabeth M. Weiss,et al.  Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  A. Colley,et al.  Age and gender differences in computer use and attitudes among secondary school students: what has changed? , 2003 .

[3]  Jeffery D. Wilfong.  Computer anxiety and anger: the impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  R. Kay.  A practical theoretical approach to assessing computer attitudes: the computer attitude measure (CAM) , 1989 .

[5]  Judith B. Harris,et al.  Correlates Among Teachers’ Anxieties, Demographics, and Telecomputing Activity , 1996 .

[6]  Robin Kay,et al.  Evaluating the Use of Learning Objects for Secondary School Science , 2007 .

[7]  Robin Kay,et al.  Exploring Gender Differences in Computer-Related Behaviour: Past, Present, and Future , 2008 .

[8]  Kerry Martin,et al.  Different Shoes, Same Footprints? A Cross-Disciplinary Evaluation of Students' Online Learning Experiences: Preliminary Findings from the SOLE Project , 2004 .

[9]  Gabriel López-Morteo,et al.  Computer support for learning mathematics: A learning environment based on recreational learning objects , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[10]  A. Colley,et al.  The effects of age, gender and computer experience upon computer attitudes , 1997 .

[11]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Discovery learning, representation, and explanation within a computer-based simulation: finding the right mix , 2004 .

[12]  Yixin Zhang,et al.  Age, gender, and Internet attitudes among employees in the business world , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Robin Kay,et al.  A case for ubiquitous, integrated computing in teacher education , 2000 .

[14]  Jude T. Lubega,et al.  The Effectiveness of Assessment Learning Objects Produced Using Pair Programming , 2004 .

[15]  Erik Duval,et al.  Standardized uniqueness: oxymoron or vision of the future? [IEEE standards] , 2006, Computer.

[16]  Yavuz Akpinar,et al.  Student Tools Supported by Collaboratively Authored Tasks: The Case of Work Learning Unit. , 2006 .

[17]  David Wiley,et al.  Overcoming the Limitations of Learning Objects , 2004 .

[18]  Hai-Ning Liang,et al.  Designing online mathematical investigation , 2004 .

[19]  Gregory MacKinnon.  A Promising Model for Incorporating the Computer in Science Learning , 2001 .

[20]  Pei-Chun Shih,et al.  The effect of previous experience with information and communication technologies on performance in a Web-based learning program , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Patricia S. Moyer,et al.  Third Graders Learn about Fractions Using Virtual Manipulatives: A Classroom study , 2005 .

[22]  Ann Colley,et al.  Gender differences in adolescents' perceptions of the best and worst aspects of computing at school , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Michel Ferrari,et al.  Computer-related attitudes and actions of teacher candidates , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Robin Kay.  A Critical Evaluation of Gender Differences in Computer-Related Behavior , 1993 .

[25]  Terrie Lynn Thompson,et al.  Addressing the eLearning Contradiction: A Collaborative Approach for Developing a Conceptual Framework Learning Object , 2005 .

[26]  Derek Hoy,et al.  eLearning techniques supporting problem based learning in clinical simulation , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[27]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Tomi Jaakkola,et al.  Effectiveness of learning objects in various instructional settings , 2006 .

[29]  Betty Collis,et al.  Technology and human issues in reusing learning objects , 2004 .

[30]  Min Liu,et al.  An analysis of cognitive tool use patterns in a hypermedia learning environment , 2005 .

[31]  Siu Cheung Kong,et al.  A cognitive tool for teaching the addition/subtraction of common fractions: a model of affordances , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[32]  B. Whitley.  Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[33]  Richard F. Kenny,et al.  Towards Guidelines for the Design of Interactive Multimedia Instruction: Fostering the Reflective D , 1999 .

[34]  Matt Bower.  Online assessment feedback: competitive, individualistic, or… preferred form! , 2005 .

[35]  Robin Kay.  A Systematic Evaluation of Learning Objects for Secondary School Students , 2007 .

[36]  Ralph Cafolla,et al.  Project MERLOT: Bringing Peer Review to Web-Based Educational Resources , 2006 .

[37]  Katrina Strampel,et al.  Learning Objects in Use: 'Lite' Assessment for Field Studies , 2005 .

[38]  A. Sølvberg.  Gender Differences in Computer-related Control Beliefs and Home Computer Use , 2002 .

[39]  Michael Russell,et al.  Examining the Relationship between Home and School Computer Use and Students' English/Language Arts Test Scores. , 2005 .

[40]  Kate J. Garland,et al.  Computer experience: a poor predictor of computer attitudes , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Mohamed Ally,et al.  A Study of the Design and Evaluation of a Learning Object and Implications for Content Development , 2005 .

[42]  Cameron Richards,et al.  Developing Interactive Learning Objects for a Computing Mathematics Module , 2006 .

[43]  Bassam Hasan,et al.  An Empirical Examination of a Model of Computer Learning Performance , 2004, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Richard F. Schmid,et al.  Student perceived effectiveness of computer technology use in post-secondary classrooms , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[45]  Dick Botteldooren,et al.  Implementation and Evaluation of a Course Concept Based on Reusable Learning Objects , 2003 .

[46]  Harald Vacik,et al.  The use of COCOON in teaching silviculture , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[47]  T. Andre,et al.  Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: the roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs , 1996 .

[48]  Robin Kay,et al.  Evaluating the learning in learning objects , 2007 .

[49]  Thomas Cochrane,et al.  Interactive QuickTime: Developing and Evaluating Multimedia Learning Objects to Enhance Both Face-To-Face and Distance E-Learning Environments , 2004 .

[50]  R. Kay.  An Analysis of Methods Used to Examine Gender Differences in Computer-Related Behavior , 1992 .

[51]  John King,et al.  An investigation of computer anxiety by gender and grade , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  Min Liu,et al.  Middle School Students’ Self-Efficacy, Attitudes, and Achievement in a Computer-Enhanced Problem-Based Learning Environment , 2006 .

[53]  Robin Kay,et al.  Assessing learning, quality and engagement in learning objects: the Learning Object Evaluation Scale for Students (LOES-S) , 2009 .

[54]  Terrie Lynn Thompson,et al.  Addressing the E-Learning Contradiction , 2009 .

[55]  Helen Forgasz.  Factors that encourage or inhibit computer use for secondary mathematics teaching , 2006 .

[56]  John C. Nesbit,et al.  Learning Object Evaluation: Computer-Mediated Collaboration And Inter-Rater Reliability , 2003 .

[57]  William Aspray,et al.  The State of Research on Girls and IT , 2008 .

[58]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Women and information technology , 1989 .

[59]  G. Knezek,et al.  Internal consistency reliabilities for 14 computer attitude scales , 2000 .

[60]  Claire Bradley,et al.  The Design, Development, and Use of Multimedia Learning Objects , 2004 .

[61]  Galen A. Grimes,et al.  Email end users and spam: relations of gender and age group to attitudes and actions , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[62]  Barbara Wasson,et al.  Coordinating Collaborative Knowledge Building , 2003 .

[63]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Exploring the relationship between emotions and the acquisition of computer knowledge , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[64]  J. E. Kubeck.  FINDING INFORMATION ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB: EXPLORING OLDER ADULTS' EXPLORATION , 1999 .

[65]  Laura Hall,et al.  Computer self-efficacy, training effectiveness and user attitudes: An empirical study , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..