Constituting Digital Tools and Materials as Classroom Resources: The Example of Dynamic Geometry

This chapter examines the appropriation of digital resources into the mainstream practice of secondary-school mathematics teaching, taking the particular example of dynamic geometry to illustrate this process. It highlights some crucial but often overlooked facets of the changes in teaching practice and teacher knowledge that accompany the constitution of digital tools and materials as classroom resources. First, the chapter demonstrates the interpretative flexibility surrounding a resource and the way in which wider educational orientations influence conceptions of its use. It does so by showing how such conceptions of dynamic geometry have shifted between pioneering advocates and mainstream adopters; and how these conceptions vary across such adopters according to their wider approaches to teaching mathematics. Second, the chapter outlines a conceptual framework intended to make visible and analysable the way in which certain structuring features shape the incorporation of new technologies into classroom practice. This conceptual framework is then used to examine the case of a teacher leading what – for him – is an innovative lesson involving dynamic geometry, and specifically to identify how his professional knowledge is being adapted and extended. This shows how the effective integration of new technologies into everyday teaching depends on a more fundamental and wide-ranging adaptation and extension of teachers’ professional knowledge than has generally been appreciated.

[1]  S. Hennessy,et al.  A practitioner model of the use of computer-based tools and resources to support mathematics teaching and learning , 2002 .

[2]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Policy Implementation and Cognition: Reframing and Refocusing Implementation Research , 2002 .

[3]  Ghislaine Gueudet,et al.  ONLINE RESOURCES IN MATHEMATICS: TEACHERS' GENESIS OF USE , 2007 .

[4]  J. Remillard Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula , 2005 .

[5]  F. Arzarello,et al.  A cognitive analysis of dragging practises in Cabri environments , 2002 .

[6]  A. Bruni The Social Shaping of Technology (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[7]  Marianne Amarel,et al.  Classrooms and Computers as Instructional Settings , 1983 .

[8]  Sally Brown,et al.  Making sense of teaching , 1993 .

[9]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Teachers' Thought Processes. Occasional Paper No. 72. , 1984 .

[10]  Cosette Crisan,et al.  Mathematics and ICT: a framework for conceptualising secondary school mathematics teachers’ classroom practices , 2007 .

[11]  Luc Trouche,et al.  Instrumental Genesis, Individual and Social Aspects , 2005 .

[12]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[13]  Michèle Artigue,et al.  Learning Mathematics in a CAS Environment: The Genesis of a Reflection about Instrumentation and the Dialectics between Technical and Conceptual Work , 2002, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[14]  Kenneth Ruthven,et al.  Instrumenting Mathematical Activity: Reflections on Key Studies of the Educational Use of Computer Algebra Systems , 2002, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[15]  Robert B. Burns,et al.  A Comparison of Activity Structures During Basic Skills and Problem-Solving Instruction in Seventh-Grade Mathematics , 1986 .

[16]  Luc Trouche,et al.  The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators : turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument , 2005 .

[17]  John Monaghan,et al.  Teachers’ Activities in Technology-Based Mathematics Lessons , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[18]  P. Cobb,et al.  Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in Mathematics. , 1996 .

[19]  L. Trouche,et al.  Ressources vives: Le travail documentaire des professeurs en mathématiques , 2010 .

[20]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  The social shaping of technology : how the refrigerator got its hum , 1985 .

[21]  Carey Jewitt,et al.  Pace, interactivity and multimodality in teachers’ design of texts for interactive whiteboards in the secondary school classroom , 2007 .

[22]  Gaea Leinhardt,et al.  Introduction and Integration of Classroom Routines by Expert Teachers , 1987 .

[23]  Jennifer Jenson,et al.  Finding space for technology: Pedagogical observations on the organization of computers in school environments , 2006 .

[24]  Daniel Scher,et al.  Lifting the Curtain: The Evolution of The Geometer's Sketchpad , 2000 .

[25]  Colette Laborde,et al.  Integration of Technology in the Design of Geometry Tasks with Cabri-Geometry , 2002, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[26]  S. Hennessy,et al.  Using graphing software to teach about algebraic forms: a study of technology-supported practice in secondary-school mathematics , 2009 .

[27]  D. Ball,et al.  Reform by the Book: What Is—or Might Be—the Role of Curriculum Materials in Teacher Learning and Instructional Reform? , 1996 .

[28]  Henry Jay Becker,et al.  Teacher and Teacher-Directed Student Use of Computers and Software. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey. Report #3. , 1999 .

[29]  Sara Hennessy,et al.  Constructions of dynamic geometry: A study of the interpretative flexibility of educational software in classroom practice , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[30]  Troels Lange Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education , 2007 .

[31]  Sara Hennessy,et al.  Incorporating Internet resources into classroom practice: pedagogical perspectives and strategies of secondary-school subject teachers , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Teresa Assude,et al.  Time Management in the Work Economy of A Class, A Case Study: Integration of Cabri in Primary School Mathematics Teaching , 2005 .

[33]  Lorin W. Anderson,et al.  The Activity Structure of Lesson Segments , 1987 .

[34]  Jeffrey M. Kenton,et al.  Toward Technology Integration in the Schools: Why It Isn’t Happening , 2005 .

[35]  Dietmar Küchemann,et al.  A comparative study of geometry curricula , 2002 .

[36]  Becky Smerdon,et al.  Teachers' Tools for the 21st Century: A Report on Teachers' Use of Technology. Statistical Analysis Report. , 2000 .

[37]  Kenneth Ruthven Towards a Naturalistic Conceptualisation of Technology Integration in Classroom Practice: the example of school mathematics , 2009 .

[38]  J. Calderhead,et al.  Teachers' Professional Learning , 1988 .

[39]  John Olive,et al.  Implications of Using Dynamic Geometry Technology for Teaching and Learning , 2006 .

[40]  Robin Williams,et al.  The Social Shaping Of Information And Communications Technologies , 2009 .

[41]  Anupam Dewan,et al.  Some Case Studies , 2011 .

[42]  M. Wittrock Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .